What's new
By:

Temporary Injunction against USAPA filed today

How is that bigoted? One "g" btw.

Any pilot knows from day one there are certain things you don't bring up and one of them is religion. If the tub-thumpers want to make it uncomfortable for me then I will return the favor. And like I said, my PMs thanking me show I'm not very much alone.

Now go ask jesus for parity. We'll see if he's listening.
 
Move2CLT said:
Save it jesus freak. The hypocrisy of your religion makes me nauseous.
Click to expand...


Hmmm.....i only quoted you and warned ur buddies of ur disaproval. As I recall i suggested same to one of ur own a few days ago as felt way tooo easy to use His Words out of context. No harm...no foul. Your words would have to be in any way significant to warrant any feelings from me. 🙂
FA
 
Move2CLT said:
Save it jesus freak. The hypocrisy of your religion makes me nauseous.
Click to expand...
Hypocrisy is a human trait and it is not valid to ascribe such a cognitive behavior it to an inanimate object, idea or teaching. Can a rock be morally good or morally bad? Can an orange behave badly? Of course not and the teachings of the Bible about Christianity cannot be ontologically hypocritical since truths and teachings cannot pretend to say one thing but then act in a different manner altogether. That would be a logical absurdity akin to a "square circle" or a four-wheeled tricycle.

Now, we see people all the time who say one thing and then do the exact opposite. This would be a correct description of hypocrisy. All people, Christians included, are likely to be hypocritical at one time or another because we are imperfect beings. We know what we want to do or what we should do according to moral standards, but then we fail because our conscious, moral mind does not always have command of our entire being. For example, I might tell myself 100 times a day that I will never let a profane word come out of my mouth, but then I hit my thumb with a hammer and before my mind can remind me of what I didn't want to do, the filthy word already has already passed over my tongue.

Of course there are no shortage of people, professing Christians included, who know full well what the right and God-honoring thing to do is and then make the fully cognitive choice to do the opposite anyway. This obviously reveals a weakness of their character and quite possibly the genuineness of their faith in Christ, but it does not modify the unchanging standard of conduct revealed to us in Scripture. The problem is not with the teachings or with the divine truths, but with the imperfect people and their penchant for fulfilling their selfish, self-serving desires in opposition to what they know is expected of them.

One of the biggest fallacies people make is that when someone professes faith in Christ, that God suddenly makes them perfect and incapable of sin. This is not the case and Scripture does not teach that we should expect this kind of transformation. What is described is a lifelong struggle to yield more and more of our selfish nature to the will of God so that we become more and more like Christ. Anyone who claims Christians are or should expect to be morally perfect here in this life are ignorant of what the Bible teaches.
 
Well, if you guys can let class out at the semenary...I'd like to point out that another day goes by without a ruling from Judge Conrad.

Not exactly the slam dunk some of you were expecting???

Driver B)
 
CallawayGolf said:
Workplace restrictions notwithstanding, you can pray for anything your heart desires. The real question is your prayer done in faith and in seeking for the Father's will to be done rather than your own?
Click to expand...

Hey Jesus works in mysterious ways... in fact, He even has a twitter account covering Major League Baseball. http://twitter.com/#!/MLBJesus.

I think His favorite team is the Angels though... go fig. Praise the Late Innings, and Pass the Beer!

So Proclaims Jester.
 
UtterlyUdder said:
Your post is thoroughly reprehensible and offensive.
Click to expand...
I'm not sure you understand the meaning of reprehensible, but I guess you clarified it with your second adjective so I get the point.

The choice is yours to be offended since no one can force that conditioned response upon you. Your reaction to the words and actions of others is entirely an internal matter to you. If you decide the color blue is offensive, then you will choose to be offended when you see that color. The color blue wasn't inherently offensive; you made it that way by your own choice in defining what is personally offensive to you.

Likewise, you can choose not to be offended by the words and actions of others. For example, you can say you hate me or hate my believes or call me names or claim that I am the most ignorant person in the world and I will not be offended at that because I refuse to be offended by by the actions of others. Your personal beliefs are yours to retain or discard as you see fit.

Of course beyond the pejoratives if you claim something that is false to be true or visa versa, I may respond to you by way or correction, but that is not out of a feeling of personal offense. So if you offer your opinion about me, I will accept that without offense. But if you claim God does not exist, I will more than likely respond with the irrefutable and logical facts that prove that He does exist, not to offend you but to correct your false statement of fact.
 
A320 Driver said:
Well, if you guys can let class out at the semenary...I'd like to point out that another day goes by without a ruling from Judge Conrad.

Not exactly the slam dunk some of you were expecting???

Driver B)
Click to expand...
I've just got a feeling that the Judge has a few other cases going on that need his attention as well. He'll rule when he's ready and the ruling will determine if it's a slam dunk or not. How long did it take for USAPA to get their "time out" ruling from the 9th?

Jim
 
BoeingBoy said:
I've just got a feeling that the Judge has a few other cases going on that need his attention as well. He'll rule when he's ready and the ruling will determine if it's a slam dunk or not. How long did it take for USAPA to get their "time out" ruling from the 9th?

Jim
Click to expand...

So your point is that the courts are bogged down and it takes a little more time to get a ruling?

I think the point here is that the West boys pronounced judgement as of last Friday, and they were wrong.

breeze
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

U
Federal Court Grants US Airways' Request For an Expedited Hearing On A Preliminary Injunction Agains
15 16 17
Replies
241
Views
38K
cynic
C
W
AA/FareChase Suit - Sabre Joins Suit against AA
Replies
0
Views
1K
WingNaPrayer
W
T
PHL Baggage Issues Again today
Replies
9
Views
2K
john john
J
U
Response to USAPA ad in USA Today
17 18 19
Replies
276
Views
58K
apollo
A
L
Amfa's About-face On Free Speech
2 3
Replies
37
Views
3K
Bob Owens
B

Latest posts

Back
Top