SWAMT: You know what Brian, don't speak about what AMFA will do or not do. AMFA has brought numerous outsourced maint. back into house at SWA that you never speak of. When the company farms something out they were not supposed our "Outsourcing Rep" Full time possition with AMFA/SWA files the paperwork. AMFA is the only union that has this position within a contract. Let us not forget AMFA is the only union to bring in more maint to our Dallas mechs by nego a 4th line of heavy maint as well as nego new aircraft maint in Denver. The Denver positions will be posted this month. The 4th line will start mid July 2013, but the company is still hiring 5-10 mechs each and every month until head count is reached of a tot of about 90, as this too was nego by AMFA. I think you better take a good look at the current union, TWU, agreeing to 40% maint getting farmed out of the house. If you don't believe me our contract is public info, simply click and read.
I really do wish you guys would stop the false rumors and misleading postings about AMFA. Everything is simply 100% better at AMFA than the other unions, that all you guys have is lies and misleading info to try to win your cases to keep or mov e onto yet another industrial union.-- You can have them both..
……………………………………………………………………………………………………………
First I would like you to know I have always respected the SWA AMT’s. They are expected to be hard working and know what they are doing. Southwest carefully screens new hires to insure they get the cream of the AMT crop, but if you work there you know this already. My tilt is really with AMFA who I’ve known about for many years.
For example: After attempting repeated raids against other unions like the IAM, IBT, and TWU, they thought they would somehow forget all that and support AMFA at NWA. How naïve was that? Even the Pilots wouldn’t participate.
Another issue that AMFA brags about is the fact the current SWA - AMFA contract is claimed to be the industry leader. They conveniently forget that AMFA inherited it from the IBT, and improvements came about to a large degree because SWA management (in most cases) tends to recognize the value of it’s employees, and has never suffered a losing quarter. Something no other carrier can claim and that adds major leverage in contract negotiations, besides the obvious fact that AA is in bankruptcy whether we feel its an appropriate venue or not.
As an example, I’m sure you know the SWA Flight Attendants, Ramp Agents, and Flight Dispatchers are represented by TWU.
“Southwest Airlines and the Transport Workers Union said Monday that Southwest’s flight dispatchers at Southwest Airlines have approved a new contract that goes through November 2014. The union said of 188 eligible voters, 180 voted in favor and two voted against the contract, with six not voting. CORRECTED, 2:45 p.m.: The original announcement put the vote at 180-6”.
Local TWU president Mike Connor said the deal provides “top of industry wages.”
In regard to AMFA’s SWA outsourcing I took your advice and although it took a lot of effort to find it, checked your current contract language:
“The new contract also includes a Letter of Agreement restricting the Company’s ability to perform maintenance at international locations to a maximum of four (4) lines should the need arise. This new language removes the Company’s current unlimited ability to take non-customarily preformed work out of the United States” (If I recall, a new (4[sup]th[/sup]) line was authorized for San Salvador).
“Southwest Airlines Mechanics shall continue to perform the existing Three (3) Heavy lines that are currently being conducted at Southwest Airlines facilities”.
As for the comparison of outsourcing oversight language:
SWA - “The Company agrees to assign one (1) AMFA Representative as a liaison to work with the Maintenance Planning Department. This representative will be responsible for the coordination of all outsource notifications between the Company and AMFA utilizing such methods as agreed upon by the parties”.
AA - The Company has agreed to create a joint committee with the TWU International for the purpose of reviewing quarterly, insourcing and outsourcing practices.
While you criticize the new TWU outsourcing limits, I believe they are more restrictive than those of every other major carrier in the industry.
SWA current contract language:
“The Company agrees to maintain no less than an authorized headcount of 2.75, in the mechanic (aircraft, facilities, ground support, lead and inspector) work group per aircraft ratio, provided however, such ratio shall not include any aircraft that are operated on behalf of the Company by another air carrier in conjunction with any Code-Share or Marketing Agreement”.
By comparison, a quick check of the AA Title I seniority list (AMTs, Crew Chiefs, and Inspectors only) indicates an approximate current staffing headcount of 13.9 AMT’s per aircraft. Even with the potential future layoff of 2155 AMTs, we would still be at an approximate headcount of 10.2 AMT’s per aircraft, far above that of SWA. The bottom line is if American were offered the SWA - AMFA outsourcing language, AA CEO Tom Horton would think he died and went to heaven!
In closing, I should add that the Transport Workers Union was the first Union that negotiated an ASAP Program for its AMT’s. A Self-disclosure Program that has served our members interests in an era of increasing federal agency oversight.
SWAMT - I don’t mean to criticize you for not knowing the numbers I’ve researched from the AA data since you don’t work here, or have access to it like I have. And in typical AMFA fashion, I wouldn’t expect AMFA to provide you with anything that would undermine their version of the facts. You are an AMT like I am, and that I do respect. “Good Luck to you”