HPearlyretiree
Veteran
- Nov 6, 2002
- 1,881
- 1,614
Yeah, and Thai is losing millions on those routes, and can't find way to make it work.
Flights from US to BKK are dirt cheap with EVA, Air China, Korean, Asiana, JAL all offering non stops.
US Airways looks to other Asia routes
- Thread starter USA320Pilot
- Start date
Flights from US to BKK are dirt cheap with EVA, Air China, Korean, Asiana, JAL all offering non stops.
LCC_#1
Veteran
You are SOOOO spot on!! I am so sick of these visions of granduer around. We have THE worst customer service and inflight product and NO...thats NO airplanes on the property FOR the route and you guys think the govt will give US China authority on the promise of 2 A340's.
We ARE the joke of the industry and we want to enter a HIGHLY competitive market like China?
I can here it now. You have a bad attitude...NO, keeping it real!!
Not cheap...inexpensive. US Airways is cheap! <_<
Maybe it is just how the thread title and linked article are worded, but why is seeking NRT slots and aircraft contingent on getting China approval? Seems like they should get the planes first, and then if China falls through, still try to go ahead with NRT.
While it's true, Asian Carriers offer a far superior product to Asia, Ive flown most of them, and SQ or TG is the best, somehow NW and UA manage to hang in there. NW has the nasty, smelly interiors and bad food and cabin service, UA has nice clean cabins and good food, but very rude, poor and nasty cabin service. Once both carriers get to NRT, Asian cabin crews take over and is a world of difference.... 
So maybe LCC can squeeze a nickel or two out of the route. Cant really be much worse than any other domestic carrier. But if Im paying money for a trip, it's going to CX, TG or SQ.
So maybe LCC can squeeze a nickel or two out of the route. Cant really be much worse than any other domestic carrier. But if Im paying money for a trip, it's going to CX, TG or SQ.What are the chances of acquiring a MNL or CEB non-stop route?While it's true, Asian Carriers offer a far superior product to Asia, Ive flown most of them, and SQ or TG is the best, somehow NW and UA manage to hang in there. NW has the nasty, smelly interiors and bad food and cabin service, UA has nice clean cabins and good food, but very rude, poor and nasty cabin service. Once both carriers get to NRT, Asian cabin crews take over and is a world of difference....
AA canceled SJC-NRT in October, 2006.
LAX-NRT began in April, 2004. Dunno how those two are related.
You may be thinking of JFK-NRT; AA used its SEA-NRT authority and slots to begin JFK-NRT in April, 2002.
IIRC, Japan and USA most certainly have a bilateral that governs route authority. Not as restrictive as China and not as restrictive as Bermuda II, but still not open skies.
BuffaloJoe
Veteran
- Thread Starter
- #23
In addition to Philadelphia to Shanghai service, do not be surprised if US Airways seeks service from Philadelphia to Tokyo, Seoul, and Tel Aviv, which will require about 10 A-340's.
Regards,
USA320Pilot
Regards,
USA320Pilot
You may think this is stupid, but I think that a flight from the east coast to Osaka would do well. JAL quit LAX to Osaka, and no one does it from the east coast. Do you think that there would be enough yields to do it?
ClueByFour
Veteran
Riiiight. This is an airline which basically can't fill past LGW/FRA/MUC/CDG/MAN (and MAN's only because of a local contract) in the winter over the Atlantic. Can't (or won't) fly LAS-anywhere in Europe, yet it's your postulation that in addition to NRT (to a slot US does not have) that US is going to fly to Seoul and Tel Aviv.
I wish I knew the hebrew for "and their is a tooth fairy, charlie brown...."
delldude
Veteran
When I go to the web sites for the airlines you mention I can only find connecting service to BKK. Where are you looking?
PA18
Senior
- Aug 12, 2004
- 398
- 9
Jerry Glass: "We need you pilots to work under LOA 93 for the rest of your lives so we can afford to buy these shiny new four-engine airplanes."
East Pilots: "Okay!"
Jerry Glass: "We need you pilots to work under LOA 93 for the rest of your lives so we can afford to buy these shiny new four-engine airplanes."
