you know I have seen this before..that "Senior vs. Junior" or "Junior vs. Senior" and that perception or rivalry that exist to some.. but not to others at all.
It is that idea that a new hire looks at a 30 year employee and thinks, they just cannot understand what I am going through being on the bottom of the list, and then the 30 year employee thinking, well I had to go through what you are going through so its nothing new...or why does that base get all the good flying, while our base doesn't, and so on..
its not even about unions its that perception or that generation gap/vast difference in seniority/one toward the top of a list while one is toward the bottom/one at one base some at another..while one thinking "they get all the good stuff and everything is about them"...and the other thinking..."just deal with it, I had to do the same thing that you are going through"...
how to change that is simply, we want to make sure than what ever someone went through at an earlier time does not necessarily need to be repeated....meaning just because I had to do something, maybe in the future that can be addressed and changed so someone else doesn't have to..basically making it better...do you know who that falls on ultimately...the ones who the majority put in place to be their leaders. real change comes from those..(in leadership positions) that are truly intent on making it better for all, instead of focusing on a personal agenda or simply may not be the most effective(but have good intent..)
it is so important when voting for anyone that you "mix it up"...if a group continually votes the same people in over and over the same ideas from the past will more than likely stay in place. consider new faces and fresh ideas with new leaders, in that regard maybe a more balanced plan will become an alternative.
I think the key is to have a mix of experienced/new people with new ideas in leadership positions, because unless someone tries something different you end up with the same ole same ole...you know?
but regardless...that idea of rivalry may still exist(even with positive change)...that is an individual perception that does not necessarily go away even with these changes.. because one may still view a situation as simply, not being able to strive for something or obtain because the situation is always to someone else advantage.
my idea is to vote for effective leaders who may have a real idea/vision how that make real changes(that benefit all) a possibility.. as a start?
It is that idea that a new hire looks at a 30 year employee and thinks, they just cannot understand what I am going through being on the bottom of the list, and then the 30 year employee thinking, well I had to go through what you are going through so its nothing new...or why does that base get all the good flying, while our base doesn't, and so on..
its not even about unions its that perception or that generation gap/vast difference in seniority/one toward the top of a list while one is toward the bottom/one at one base some at another..while one thinking "they get all the good stuff and everything is about them"...and the other thinking..."just deal with it, I had to do the same thing that you are going through"...
how to change that is simply, we want to make sure than what ever someone went through at an earlier time does not necessarily need to be repeated....meaning just because I had to do something, maybe in the future that can be addressed and changed so someone else doesn't have to..basically making it better...do you know who that falls on ultimately...the ones who the majority put in place to be their leaders. real change comes from those..(in leadership positions) that are truly intent on making it better for all, instead of focusing on a personal agenda or simply may not be the most effective(but have good intent..)
it is so important when voting for anyone that you "mix it up"...if a group continually votes the same people in over and over the same ideas from the past will more than likely stay in place. consider new faces and fresh ideas with new leaders, in that regard maybe a more balanced plan will become an alternative.
I think the key is to have a mix of experienced/new people with new ideas in leadership positions, because unless someone tries something different you end up with the same ole same ole...you know?
but regardless...that idea of rivalry may still exist(even with positive change)...that is an individual perception that does not necessarily go away even with these changes.. because one may still view a situation as simply, not being able to strive for something or obtain because the situation is always to someone else advantage.
my idea is to vote for effective leaders who may have a real idea/vision how that make real changes(that benefit all) a possibility.. as a start?