Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
So when Sally and Billy bump nasties in the back seat and sally gets a bun in the oven, what happens to the child that neither want? Are you going to adopt it?
The fear of starvation and homelessness is a powerful motivator. Also the kid can be placed for adoption at any time. It can also be confiscated by the state and put up for adoption and the woman sent to prison for neglect.
So you want the state to step in after the fact to try and care for the child instead of trying to prevent the birth in the first place?
So you want the state to step in after the fact to try and care for the child instead of trying to prevent the birth in the first place?
Paulbots would not exist if were not for him feeding at the government trough for so many years. He brought home the pork to Galveston and his district better than many in a Texas.
Frankly in a case like this the state has to step in to an extent. The federal government should have no role beyond creating an environment where charitable giving is encouraged through bully pulpit and tax code.
You are absolutely correct. Ron Paul has been confronted on this several times that I'm aware of. He is one of few who will openly concede to going after pork projects. In fact he supports the concept to a point. He has pointed out that he feels it proper to ensure that he get as much money back in the way of projects as the people in his district pay in taxes.
I'm not crazy about his position but I do understand it.
That's easy tree.."Pork" and "Wasteful spending" are identiacal projects in a different state.