What's new

2014 Fleet Service Discussion

Status
Not open for further replies.
Tim Nelson said:
the only one who sold usair out was you when you dimed out the phl 22.
Grandstanding znd exploiting your personal situation so that the twu raid could be extended was very sad as the iam was representing the phl 22.
That's the best you can do? Why couldn't you get 5 US guys on your ticket? You have no juice and you are telling people you will be the savior, you are weak at best. 
 
Tim Nelson said:
You know how I got those emails?  I don't have any "My Guy" in DCA but are you going to exclude who you call "My Guy" off that list now or approach him and harass him or blacklist him?
No, I won't at all. Unless he asked to be off the email. He is entitled to his opinion and I have no problem with that.Tim, like I have said, I welcome elections. I only want to be in a position to represent the membership if they want me to be. If not, I'm fine with going back to my position on the ramp. Much less to deal with anyway. My only problem is you should have US people running against US people. That way whichever side wins, we keep our positions on the board the same. Believe me, if you win, you will agree with me. Problem is, it'll be too late to get those positions back. And we will never regain them due to UA having such a majority of members. But everyone is entitled to their opinion. Including me, which is what will be expressed on my emails.
 
It will likely never happen but I would like to see US split from UA for just sort of thing CB. Then it could be all US people on it
 
There was talk of them moving the ramp into 142 last summer but it was put on hold.
 
700UW said:
There was talk of them moving the ramp into 142 last summer but it was put on hold.
thks I'd sure like to see that it would make thing fairer
 
I feel ya, back in the day when M&R was in 141 before and after you all unionized we were second fiddle to UA and it sucked. It was much better when we left 141 then 141M and went into 142.
 
Can we take a break from the pissing match, and perhaps address my question about Retro pay? I have heard something along the lines of a signing bonus, and that doesn't cut it with many of us over a true retro pay package that compensates based on past hours worked. I can't see some agents who have only worked 30 hours per week getting the same compensation for back pay as one who put in 50+ for the past 2 years...
 
700UW said:
There was talk of them moving the ramp into 142 last summer but it was put on hold.
You are lying once again, I asked this question a few weeks back and you said it would never happen and that the IAM wanted the craft/class separated now you say otherwise. Is John Carr changing the story? Are you that obtuse?

Josh
 
wings396 said:
Can we take a break from the pissing match, and perhaps address my question about Retro pay? I have heard something along the lines of a signing bonus, and that doesn't cut it with many of us over a true retro pay package that compensates based on past hours worked. I can't see some agents who have only worked 30 hours per week getting the same compensation for back pay as one who put in 50+ for the past 2 years...
wings I've heard nothing positive on that but I certainly agree with you. Again I guess we'll see when an agreement comes out
 
700UW said:
When are some of you going to realize tim is in it for himself?

He has been on a power trip for over 20 years, he has been removed from office and fired from the district before, go back and read how I posted his history, go ask him how is he going to get everything accomplished he promises. He can't he will say and do anything to get elected, wake up people!
Prove your lies and lame attempts to discredit Tim. Tim speaks the truth and holds the current leaders accountable, you don't like that you are here to have everyone believe the IAM is perfect and can do no wrong.

Josh
 
700UW said:
There was talk of them moving the ramp into 142 last summer but it was put on hold.
unfortunately our mx dont want to have the ramp incuded in their district. Anfa rules apply i guess.
 
Tim Nelson said:
lol.  He's done.  He ruined our craft enough.  I tried to be nice to Canale and told him to leave with dignity and collect his IAM watch as he retires. I think Mr Delaney ought to consider the same thing and think about his family, etc.  Unfortunately, for half his team, his past actions against the members, and the team he helped to create against him, won't fair to well in June imo.  Time will tell but I think it's time for the bull shitters to be shown the door.  6 years of nothingness other than blowing up this craft and Vegas parties is enough.
The very team you strongly endorsed 6 years ago. Fact is... the more you bash this team the more your credibility, what's left of it, erodes. Maybe you can ride the coat tails of the UA dissention and get yourself, and the two inexperienced candidates you're running with, elected on the US side of the ballot but that will not translate into anything for the good of the membership at US. Many on this forum see your present agenda. Many on this forum know your history. You cannot escape the past sir. What is done in the dark will be brought to the light. By the way... when I'm considering voting for AGC and VP positions I'm looking at experience at grievance representation; not the current status of contract negotiations. You seem to have overlooked this consideration. Let's discuss and compare AGC candidates' experience in representing grievances. I'm sure you would agree this issue is paramount, when considering endorsement of an AGC. I know you want to keep the focus on contract negotiations. I can appreciate that. However, the election is about more than that. What should members expect, regarding grievance representation from the district, who are assigned recently elected popular AGC candidates from other cities who have no experience? This election is not soley about contract negotiations Sir!   
 
Hey stalker you are lying, never stated that, go back and read it again, or do you not have the brain power?

I stated there was talk about it last summer!

And what is with the name-dropping? Does it make you feel important?

And John Carr has nothing to do with fleet, he doesn't work in air transport.

And to the posters on this board, ask yourself why would an alleged jp morgan employee care so much about the IAM and drop names and stick his nose in here all the time.
 
Josh learn to read stalker, all ready proved it and you disappeared from the board after I proved tim's history, go back and read stalker.
 
You didn't prove anything. I asked you a few weeks back about consolidating 141/142 you said it would never happen, you lied plain and simple. Did John Carr give you bad information?

Josh
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Latest posts

Back
Top