What's new

2014 Fleet Service Discussion

Status
Not open for further replies.
700UW said:
More lies from you.
 
I have never stated on how PMCO employees feel about the IAM.
 
You really are a pathological liar.
 
Well the IAM has shown them the value of representation.  
 
Josh
 
737823 said:
 
700 will slam you for questioning IAMNPF and its viability. 
 
Josh
Stalker,
 
You really need to seek help.
 
Go get a life, its apparent you dont have one when you have to mention me in almost every post you make and of course you lie about everything anyhow!
 
Why do you keep lying saying John Carr and Jeff Rusk saved Tim's job and blaming him for the blood bath of 1992?
 
Josh
 
737823 said:
 
No surprise the IAM kept too many people employed, headcount is the driver of dues revenue.  So by giving them a contract meeting the cost guidance without cutting headcount means you did indeed give more in concessions to produce headcount heavy proposal that would cost out the same as a less concessionary agreement with fewer headcount. Either way you and your team failed the membership.
 
Josh
We actually protected more work and even met their ask with less of a paycut then the company had in their offer.
 
Since  you werent there and not involved, you have to make up stories and lie.
 
737823 said:
Why do you keep lying saying John Carr and Jeff Rusk saved Tim's job and blaming him for the blood bath of 1992?
 
Josh
And this has NOTHING to do with the topic.
 
Why do you constantly lie and make up things?
 
You are not even smart enough stop posting lies when you have be proven wrong over and over on the same subject numerous times.
 
700UW said:
And this has NOTHING to do with the topic.
 
Why do you constantly lie and make up things?
 
You are not even smart enough stop posting lies when you have be proven wrong over and over on the same subject numerous times.
 
So you agree Tim wasn't responsible for the blood bath of 1992. Noted thanks.
 
Josh
 
737823 said:
 
Another failure on your part. Weren't you in utility/lav service?  Funny you skip over my point about UAX at IAD, why hasn't that work gone to mainline UA ramp with the new agreement?
 
Josh
I had utility time, I was a Stock Clerk.
 
And this is about US, not UA, not UAX and not about IAD.
 
Why do you constantly lie about everything?

Why are you so nose deep involved defending tim when you arent an IAM member nor a US Employee?
 
737823 said:
 
So you agree Tim wasn't responsible for the blood bath of 1992. Noted thanks.
 
Josh
Lying again I see.

Where did I say that?

No where, go find someone else to lie about and stalk.
 
You really have some serious mental health issues, go seek some help.
 
737823 said:
Why do you keep lying saying John Carr and Jeff Rusk saved Tim's job and blaming him for the blood bath of 1992?
 
Josh
Don't bother with 700.  We didn't get a union contract until 1999.  I had Ed Milson represent me at the 'roundtable' and Frank Odonnal was my employee observer. 700 just makes stuff up.  The IAM never saved my job because I was never fired. If the initial discipline of 1997 was that I was fired, I can assure you that I'd prolly still be waiting for my job back if it was up to the IAM reps. I never missed a day of work and barely ever call in sick. But 700 was a lav guy who negotiated his job away.
 
700UW said:
Lying again I see.
Where did I say that?
No where, go find someone else to lie about and stalk.
 
You really have some serious mental health issues, go seek some help.
 
 

Tim Nelson said:
Josh, the bloodbath of 1992 affected me. There is a reason why I am member of Local 1487 and not Local 1725.
Myself and a few good men pushed to keep the Teamsters on the property while I was in CLT, while Charlie Brown, MF [not in CLT at the time but Rockit knows he refused], and Roabilly felt comfortable with no union, and 700 was subverting things by suggesting to folks that it wouldn't be all that bad if the Teamsters were voted out because the IAM could be voted in the next year.  So, although there was a bloodbath, it happened because the Teamsters got voted out, and 700's insistence that going non union would provide the opportunity for the IAM caused great pain on all of us.

 
 
Josh
 
Tim Nelson said:
Don't bother with 700.  We didn't get a union contract until 1999.  I had Ed Milson represent me at the 'roundtable' and Frank Odonnal was my employee observer. 700 just makes stuff up.  The IAM never saved my job and I was never fired. If the initial discipline of 1997 was that I was fired, I can assure you that I'd prolly still be waiting for my job back if it was up to the IAM reps.
 
Would seem that way, but 700 keeps attacking you and spreads misinformation.
 
Josh
 
737823 said:
 
Would seem that way, but 700 keeps attacking you and spreads misinformation.
 
Josh
You are the one who lies, attacks and spreads misinformation.
 
You are a fraud.
 
You know this Edger Bergan, Charlie McCarthy show is really out there sometimes Tim. It's a bit mental.

And 700 stop arguing with a hand puppet will you. You're being stalked and aggravated by a freakin hand puppet man.
 
Tim Nelson said:
Don't bother with 700.  We didn't get a union contract until 1999.  I had Ed Milson represent me at the 'roundtable' and Frank Odonnal was my employee observer. 700 just makes stuff up.  The IAM never saved my job because I was never fired. If the initial discipline of 1997 was that I was fired, I can assure you that I'd prolly still be waiting for my job back if it was up to the IAM reps. I never missed a day of work and barely ever call in sick. But 700 was a lav guy who negotiated his job away.
Really?
 
The only one making things up is you, you have been lying and shown to be wrong numerous times, yet you still run with the same lies.
 
No wonder why you cant ever get elected to the District or International and no wonder why you were fired from the DL and removed from GC.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Latest posts

Back
Top