2014 Pilot Discussion

[Piedmont1984]

Suspicious....?
 
Implicit Assumption 101:
 
Implicit assumptions are not adequate to carry the burden of proof necessary for a plaintiff to prevail.  Many facts, innuendo, and assumptions can seem to pile up yet the burden of proof may still not be reached, despite extremely strong suspicions that would otherwise suggest that the plaintiff would presumably prevail.... For example, many people had strong suspicions that "Teflon Bill" engaged in some activities that would have him successfully impeached.... i.e. it was implicitly assumed that a "blue dress" was very suspicious.

Well in that case, wasn't this entire recall charade based on implicit assumptions?

 

[Freighterguynow]

Mr, Parker already stood up in front of a america west pilots PHX meeting and said the west was flying one quarter of their flights on East routes.

Submitted in legal briefs by USAPA in Addington (part 3) - uncontested by the West.

24%

Res Judicata

 

[Phoenix]

Well in that case, wasn't this entire recall charade based on implicit assumptions?

 

 

Are you in favor of recalling President Gary Hummel? (please check one)

Total​

Percent​

 ​

 


Yes, I am in favor of a recall

1414​

48.84​

 ​

 


No, I am opposed to a recall

1481​

51.16​

 


 


VOTING TOTAL

2895​

 

 
 

 
 
Domicile voting percentages seem unpublished ( 😉 ), but if they were I suspect the breakdown would suggest each BPR member has nothing at all to worry about.  
 
As you skillfully belabored the point.... those who seek to make a radical change will find their burden to be very difficult and expensive, yet rarely successful, notwithstanding their devotion to their implicit assumptions.  

 

[Metroyet]

Suspicious....?
 
Implicit Assumption 101:
 
Implicit assumptions are not adequate to carry the burden of proof necessary for a plaintiff to prevail.  Many facts, innuendo, and assumptions can seem to pile up yet the burden of proof may still not be reached, despite extremely strong suspicions that would otherwise suggest that the plaintiff would presumably prevail.... For example, many people had strong suspicions that "Teflon Bill" engaged in some activities that would have him successfully impeached.... i.e. it was implicitly assumed that a "blue dress" was very suspicious.

Bill is a Rhodes scholar. USAPA is owned and operated by imbeciles.

 

[snapthis]

If the Honorable Judge Silver even thinks of getting involved in union business, she will learn a lot about labor laws via another trip through the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals.

Which brings up a question asked 30 years ago.

http://m.youtube.com/watch?v=Ug75diEyiA0

 

[traderjake]

USAPA was about to S29 him but the company beat him to it.

 
So he saved some money by waiting for the company to fire him. 
 
Twenty years for each count, he better spend it carefully.

 

[Phoenix]

Bill is a Rhodes scholar. USAPA is owned and operated by imbeciles.

 
"Is USAPA smarter than we are?"  
           
~ Quote of a rhetorical question in an email from one Leonidas leader to another, while discussing/lamenting
   the obvious meaning and purpose of paragraph 4 and 10 of the MOU, before they went on to recommend
   West pilots vote in favor of the MOU anyway, with the caveat "according to the terms of the MOU".  

 

[crazystnic]

west still thinks all FO's only retiring.
NEW Bid. April... more Growth, more captain seats.
 
17 capt retirements, 4 FO's.

 

[snapthis]

"Is USAPA smarter than we are?"  
           
~ Quote of a rhetorical question in an email from one Leonidas leader to another, while discussing/lamenting
   the obvious meaning and purpose of paragraph 4 and 10 of the MOU, before they went on to recommend
   West pilots vote in favor of the MOU anyway, with the caveat "according to the terms of the MOU".

Leonidas should not be held responsible for explaining the meaning and purpose of said paragraphs. That responsibility and liability lies at USAPA's feet.

 

[Phoenix]

Leonidas should not be held responsible for explaining the meaning and purpose of said paragraphs. That responsibility and liability lies at USAPA's feet.

 
Then Marty should have amended your complaint before the trial.  How much is he getting paid for his bafoonery.  
 
When are you guys gonna update the April 2013 webpage that lists out all those contributors?    Ya know, push for justice and all that.

 

[end_of_alpa]

Who is the guy Prechill linked to several posts ago?

 

[end_of_alpa]

I just might get a B757 Captain bid!

 

[algflyr]

I hear there is some info from Silver's court -  Anyone? Heard the West won't like it.

 

[snapthis]

Then Marty should have amended your complaint before the trial.  How much is he getting paid for his bafoonery.  
 
When are you guys gonna update the April 2013 webpage that lists out all those contributors?    Ya know, push for justice and all that.

Never mind our contributions.

The bigger picture remains...

Isn't it USAPA's responsibility to represent ALL the pilots of US Airways as it claims?
Therefore, be truthful at ALL the roadshows and not be evasive?

Never mind, it's USAPA. I expect deception.

 

[Al Legheny]

JUDGE SILVER HAS JUST RULED ON ADDINGTON II
 
USAPA has not committed a DFR violation
 
West pilots are not required to have a seat at the table in seniority integration talks. 
 
USAPA comm will have an update shortly.  Officers and BPR have been sent a copy of the order from the Arizona court as of 6:32PM E.S.T.  today.