Bill Brasky
Veteran
- Joined
- May 15, 2008
- Messages
- 637
- Reaction score
- 1,060
I think that that one footnote demonstrates a serious misunderstanding by the Judge, and the company is giving her a chance to correct the error. I believe, like others here have said, that this one statement is what the westies are hanging their hat on, and the company wants the judge to delete it, probably as a means of expediting and finalizing an SLI process. It may also be slowing down the process with APA, as they may be under the impression that they would get the right to impose their will once they become the CBA.
Basically, that one statement, if true, would make the M/B law worthless and unworkable. I seriously doubt that that is what the lawmakers had in mind.
My prediction is that she deletes it, then the SLI process will continue rapidly toward the goal of merging the APA list with the USAPA list, without the Nic.
Basically, that one statement, if true, would make the M/B law worthless and unworkable. I seriously doubt that that is what the lawmakers had in mind.
My prediction is that she deletes it, then the SLI process will continue rapidly toward the goal of merging the APA list with the USAPA list, without the Nic.