What's new

2014 Pilot Discussion

Status
Not open for further replies.
Res Judicata said:
Let's settle out of court.
 
 
Works for me fully. I don't really much care for lawyers. First start with even pretending to be even the poorest possible excuse for a supposed "pilot", and PM for mutually agreeable wager details. "You'se" are a complete joke of a "pilot" and you know it, so that'll never happen. Magically grow a pair and prove me wrong. 😉 Videos to agreeably be made available to all, both east and west, of your undoubted "victory"..."and you're far too much of a hopeless wimp to ever stand up for yourself otherwise, not even for so much as a flying wager."....? 🙂
 
"Nite nite" res, and don't drool too much over your mighty, "spartan" keyboard. I can only imagine how many keyboards "you'se" must go through. 😉
 
P.S. This is "you'se" cue to start drooling,  spew yet more mindless spittle, and continue proving yourself nothing more than a pathetic, but mouthy, little coward. In other words; a typical AWA "spartan". 🙂
 
P.P.S. Checked back in. I still don't see any PM...? Don't pretend "you'se" ain't here, since you're still signed on. What's "you'se" problem, mighty "spartan"? It's almost inconceivable that such as yourself wouldn't jump at the chance to totally humiliate the sad likes of /but a "gray haired-slope-shouldered" evil eastie for "you'se" and all's video proven amusement.....No? 😉
 
No worries Res. "You'se" umm.."spartan" sorts are always good for laughs, and thanks for keeping those coming. 🙂
 
Still up Hittin' the sauce I see!! I didn't read all your blather, I usually can't get past the first two sentences...or the first emoticon, or the first "you'se" reference, whichever happens first. I'd take any sober pilot over an emotionally unstable, habitually VERBOSE, washed up alcoholic any day of the week.

Nighty night butter bars!

P.p.p.p.p.p.p.s. Just because you see my name logged in doesn't mean I'm staring at the screen with bated breath like you do. I really don't give a Schitt about an alcoholic scab like you Señor Dale. Hate to break it to you, but in my eyes, you're nothing.
 
Res Judicata said:
 I didn't read all your blather,...Just because you see my name logged in doesn't mean I'm staring at the screen....
 
Yet "you'se" did manage to somehow find time to reply...? Nice try kid. What a lying, truly pathetic and just plain cross-threaded little wimp. All of "sparta" must be so very proud. 😉
 
No need for just mightilly mothing off to try and impress anyone. Just go buy yourself another tie, or two/three/really however many it takes for you to ever feel like any even poor excuse for just a person, much less "man": http://www.cactuspilotcontributors.com/libertynecktie.html  🙂
 
flybynite said:
I have tried to wade through all of the ranting here. But the question remains...what is going on with the current situation with you guys and the MOU? What is this thing with APA? Is the MOU leagally binding? Not, in my opinion, it's just a method or a hand shake.
 
If you are looking for factual current events in this thread, you will be sorely disappointed.
 
We here are all about ranting, and little else.  The legal processes plod on at a snail's pace totally oblivious to what is going on in this thread.
 
flybynite said:
And while I'm at it...don't think for a skinny minute APA won't fry your ass. They will..they look at all US pilots as feeders to their Hubs. You guys had better get your ducks in a row...otherwise you will be rolled.
 
I agree with your sentiment.  The westicles are sitting smugly with the (purported) Arab phrase: "The enemy of my enemy is my friend" when it comes to the APA.  There is little historical evidence pointing to the efficacy of that concept.  In the European Theater of WW II, the Allies used the concept when the Soviet Union aided in the war against Hitler's Germany.  Once Germany was defeated, how long did it take to realize that the Soviet Union was not really our friend.  (Indeed, history shows that the Axis enemies, Germany, Italy and Japan, became quick friends once their tyrants had been removed from power.)  Had the Russians beat us to the atomic bomb, I have little doubt they would have deployed them quickly against their Allied "friends."
 
While my example is hardly valid in its degree of gravity, it is certainly demonstrative of what we could expect from the APA (based on history).  The westicles think the APA is their friend, and what they think about it is irrelevant anyway.  Let them rejoice while they can, because if the APA succeeds in its attempt to remove USAPA from the SLI process, they will find themselves (along with the east pilots) quickly "nuked" by their "friends" in Ft. Worth.
 
Res Judicata said:
Let's settle out of court. How about two bottles of Old Grandad Bourbon and a Costco box of Vagasil maximum strength?
Nite nite
.
Note: this statement originally appeared on StopPolygraph.com.

Polygraph Statement of Mr. Mark C. Doyal

I had always wanted to be an FBI agent. With that singular goal in mind, I enrolled in Southwest Texas State University in the fall of 1988. My major was Law Enforcement with a minor in Economics. I graduated in December 1990 and I took the written FBI exam that next January. I passed and was scheduled for an interview in March of 1991. The interview went great and I achieved a perfect score. However, the FBI determined that I needed more experience and informed me to re-apply in two years. I immediately took the Law School Admissions Test and applied to South Texas College of Law in Houston, Texas. I was excepted for the class beginning in January 1991. I was fortunate in that I was able to obtain employment on a full time basis with the Harris County District Attorney's Office - Economic Crime Division. I remember my new boss asking me after he interviewed me what I planned on achieving with a law career. I immediately responded that I wanted a career with the FBI. Everyone who I met knew that that was my goal.

Working full time for the District Attorney while attending law school at night was tough, but I knew I had to get the right kind of experience and education to make myself the best possible candidate for the FBI. Upon graduation from law school (Dec. 1994), I re-applied with the FBI. I was scheduled to take the written exam on a Monday following the Bar exam. I again passed the written exam and had to wait to be selected for the interview. I wrote letters nearly every month to the applicant coordinator asking to be interviewed and explaining what I was doing each month. Finally, I was selected to be interviewed in Kansas City in July of 1996. Seven of us in our region were selected to go, but only two of us passed the interview process. Myself and another girl. I was on top of the world, knowing that I was about to realize my dream.

The polygraph exam was next, August 7, 1996, in San Antonio, Texas. I knew I had nothing to worry about, since I had never violated the FBI's drug policy and I had not lied on my application. The agent administering the polygraph noted during the pre- polygraph interview that I had attended a university that he believed was a "party school" and that I needed to tell him what drugs I used when I went there. I stated that I had taken none, that I didn't live on campus, I lived in another city, and that I was an older student and wasn't influenced to do such things. He repeated that that couldnít be the case and told me again to tell him what illegal drugs I had done. I countered again that that just wasn't the case and that I was telling the truth. This went back and forth for about 10 minutes and he seemed to be getting upset that I wouldnít admit to taking drugs. Finally he stated that if I was lying he was about to find out. I was upset at the unbelievable accusations he was making. Up until that point I had been treated with the utmost professionalism by the FBI staff, now I was being treated like an accused criminal. After the polygraph was over, he told me I had failed. I almost passed out in disbelief

I wrote several letters to FBI Director Freeh, and in October of 1996 I was polygraphed again, by another agent with the first agent who polygraphed me present. The results were the same, he told me I had failed. I just could not believe it. I had not lied on the polygraph. Even the first agent that had polygraphed me told me as I was leaving that he now believed me, that I was telling the truth. I wrote the Director several more times to no avail, my application was terminated in November of that year. My dreams were shattered.

Finally, as a side note, I later applied with the Secret Service. I did just as well in the testing and interview stages as I had with the FBI. When it came time for the polygraph, the agent administering it asked me if I had been polygraphed before. I told him yes, and under what circumstances and the results. He thanked me for my honesty, unhooked me from the polygraph without testing me and told me that he would have to contact his superiors for their advice. I could not believe it. Two months later I received a form letter stating that I was no longer competitive with the other agent applicants. I am a licensed attorney, professional pilot, have law enforcement experience and with top scores but I was not competitive? Obviously I had been "black balled" by the erroneous polygraph results from the FBI.

I will probably always be effected by the injustice of what happened. I wrote a final letter to Director Freeh this summer asking for another polygraph. I even offered to pay all expenses associated with retaking it if I were to fail. I guess I still haven't accepted that you can fail a polygraph while telling the truth. Or the fact that the FBI could make this kind of mistake. I had always looked up to that agency as the pinnacle of professionalism. I received the same form letter back that I had received almost two years earlier. It is a shame, since all I wanted to do was to have a chance to serve my country and make my family proud.



Sincerely,



Mark C. Doyal
 
Lord have mercy...they should try some of the Face Book sites...they would have peeled the skin off most. This place is very civil by comparison. Kudos to the Admins here.
OL' EastUS loves to throw mud but wets himself when even a fraction of such comes his way. Typical "tough-guy" thinking...what's next...more RICO charges?
 
Res Judicata said:
I really don't give a Schitt about an alcoholic scab like you. Hate to break it to you, but in my eyes, you're nothing.
 
Funny thing, East.  That's exactly what he sputtered to the FBI lie detector expert as they slammed the door in his face.
 
luvthe9 said:
.
Note: this statement originally appeared on StopPolygraph.com.

Polygraph Statement of Mr. Mark C. Doyal
 
 
This odd individual continues to prove the old axiom, "There are no guilty men in prison."  The FBI has eliminated plenty of wannabe kooks through their thorough screening process. 
 
One savvy fed responded to Doyal's unhinged ranting on another forum.  Says it all:
 
"I'll go one step further, Doyal's story is total make-believe. Sure, this is how its done on TV...but anyone that has been through the process knows just how false this story is."
 
I sleep well knowing that the FBI is striving to maintain the highest standards.
 
luvthe9 said:
>>>   I am a licensed attorney, professional pilot, have law enforcement experience and with top scores but I was not competitive? Obviously I had been "black balled" by the erroneous polygraph results from the FBI.   <<<
 
I'm sure you know by now that the Polygraph is not reliable enough to be allowed as evidence in a court room. To be denied the career of your dreams by an interview process that includes that unscientific box sucks. Yes, someone who is telling the truth can still "fail" the lie detector test. Probably because you are nervous about it, especially after the 1st failure.
 
glasspilot said:
I'm sure you know by now that the Polygraph is not reliable enough to be allowed as evidence in a court room. To be denied the career of your dreams by an interview process that includes that unscientific box sucks. Yes, someone who is telling the truth can still "fail" the lie detector test. Probably because you are nervous about it, especially after the 1st failure.
Not 100% reliable, but coupled with the sketchy behavior he exhibits in his tantrums here makes a compelling case that they were very fortunate to have avoided employing him.
He is borderline psychotic.
 
Res Judicata said:
Jesus Dale, pass out already!! Your drunken blather is boring me!!
Perfect example. Imagine the lawsuits based on this morons intuition and assessments of guilt and innocence? His Linkedin page states he is an A320 Fighter Pilot. Delusional.
 
Claxon said:
Perfect example. Imagine the lawsuits based on this morons intuition and assessments of guilt and innocence? His Linkedin page states he is an A320 Fighter Pilot. Delusional.
Doyal is one sick dude.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Latest posts

Back
Top