----------------
On 5/7/2003 11:17:17 AM Jet Mechanic wrote:
LavMan,
What is your remuneration (i.e. salary, expenses, misc.) from the IAM?
Once a person delves into all the facts regarding the AMFA vs. IAM decision, it becomes clearer. I do not receive any payments whatsoever from the IAM (I have paid dues for 20+ years), hence I am not beholden to the organization.
Jet Mechanic
----------------
-----------------------------------------------------------
Hello, Jet Mech,
Let me take a swing at this one.
The IAM is much like our government - local, state and federal. In the IAM's case, that is local, district and international.
I doubt Lavman is at the international level. Assuming his nom de plume is self-descriptive, I am also unaware of any utility personnel holding the district office of Assistant General Chairman - my understanding is mechanics hold that post. Please correct me if I'm wrong on that. At any rate, the AGC's rate of pay is in your district bylaws, and if District 141 is any indication, the rate of pay runs from 70 - 90,000 annually. In some cases, that's a fair price. In others, absolutely not!
Assuuming Lavman holds a local post, such as trustee or vice-president, that renummeration is controlled by the membership of your local lodge. The membership, acting through your by-laws committee, can increase, decrease or abolish said renummeration. ALL BYLAWS PROPERLY SUMBITTED TO THE BYLAWS COMMITTEE MUST BE BROUGHT TO THE LOCAL LODGE FLOOR FOR MEMBERSHIP CONSIDERATION. We post a current copy of the bylaws in my station so the membership knows who's getting what.
The amounts vary from lodge to lodge. Some lodges are so small, and poor, their officers receive nothing. I'm from a medium sized lodge. The officers receive between $50 and $100 monthly. Considering many of these officers have a 2 to 4 hour one way commute to the lodge (and the lodge doesn't pick up mileage or per diem), most folks are out of pocket. Oh, and they get to pay taxes on it, too. Our stewards get bupkus.
Are there dirty dogs gaming the system, and unworthy to represent the IAM membership? Sure, and if we both were not gentlemen, we could name names. My view is it is incumbent upon us, the membership, to rectify that.