your pilots used passengers as hostages during your tantrum was an example of how not to act.
The situation is very fluid, hopefully we will not overreact and use the consumers as fodder in our quest for fairness, as the United pilots have done and are currently threatning.
You are another one who loves to avoid a question. And you are an expert at redirecting a subject to avoid it. You are also skilled in theatrics and drama. Too bad for you that everyone can see that posting a few select articles made of some fact and much opinion from self proclaimed "experts" does not prove anything. Did you actually read the WHOLE article, or just the first few paragraphs? According to the authors there was much blame to spread around. And many of their assumptions are NOT based in fact.
Once again, for the benefit of others who may be interested (and certainly not for you since we all know how you play fast and loose with the facts) let's clear up some of the misconceptions presented by the uninformed... The problems of 2000 started back in 1996 at beginning of the ESOP era. When UA pilots and other workers agreed to major concessions in return for a majority stake in the company, one of the stipulations was that when the investment period ended we would have a new contract "ON TOP AND ON TIME." That meant industry leading
ON the amendable date. When the amendable date came around, the company's foot-dragging meant we were no where near a new contract. They went back on their word. Then add to that the fact that prior to this, due to good will, the interest of helping the company, and the hope that they would actually keep their word, pilots were
volunteering to work more and more in the face of managements continued expansion even while we warned that they were being too optimistic with their summer schedule and we would be left short staffed. (DID YOU GET THAT??? we were actually trying to protect the operation and our customers from management's problems!) We were ignored.
Finally, the pilots had enough and were tired of the lies and deception. The acquisition of USAir was just icing on the cake. It was seen that management cared more about the acquisition than honoring their previous commitment. The pilots were no longer motivated to help the company mask their poor management, and decided to work only as much as they were required to by contract. No more. No less. The operation fell apart at the seams and the customers were left holding the pieces. The employees were victims of management just like the passengers. Just like the East pilots career is a victim of past management blunders.
Now back to the question at hand and the topic of this thread. What will you do
IF the representational vote goes against USAPA? Since you've been proclaiming the righteousness of majority rule, will you then accept it and support ALPA since in that case you will be in the minority? Or will you cry foul once again?