What's new

Another School Massacre

Obama tells Denver democrats that Adam Lanza used a fully automatic weapon!

Now, over the next couple of months, we’ve got a couple of issues: gun control. (Applause.) I just came from Denver, where the issue of gun violence is something that has haunted families for way too long, and it is possible for us to create common-sense gun safety measures that respect the traditions of gun ownership in this country and hunters and sportsmen, but also make sure that we don’t have another 20 children in a classroom gunned down by a semiautomatic weapon — by a fully automatic weapon in that case, sadly.

The Liar-In-Chief strikes again. No one in the audience is the smarter . . . go figure!
IF he bump fired it, or had a bump fire stock, then for all intents and purposes, it WAS a fully automatic weapon.
 
IF he bump fired it, or had a bump fire stock, then for all intents and purposes, it WAS a fully automatic weapon.

Here we good again with the "what if" scenarios. The search warrants indicate that he didn't use all the ammo in the magazines. He reloaded before they were depleted. Not that you can read though.
 
IF he bump fired it, or had a bump fire stock, then for all intents and purposes, it WAS a fully automatic weapon.

Obama lied and now you continue to pervert the truth.
Either it is as manufactured or it isn't....suck on that.

Bend over Dude....I'll give you a bump fire you'll never forget....
s60.gif
 
Bump fire stocks are legal and have the uncanny ability to allow a semiautomatic to operate just like a fully automatic. But it sure gets the righties to say things like "that depends on what your definitoin of "is" is ".
 
Bump fire stocks are legal and have the uncanny ability to allow a semiautomatic to operate just like a fully automatic. But it sure gets the righties to say things like "that depends on what your definitoin of "is" is ".

Here is the real deal definition except for Liberanus'

Say what you want but it will never fit the definition of an automatic weapon by BATF.
 
Here is the real deal definition except for Liberanus'

Say what you want but it will never fit the definition of an automatic weapon by BATF.
Screw the BATF....it's a government agency, and we can't trust the government. I would prefer YOUR opinion - This is a "semiautomatic" AR15. Is his finger really that fast? What is "is"?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_U6tORrODJE
 
Screw the BATF....it's a government agency, and we can't trust the government. I would prefer YOUR opinion - This is a "semiautomatic" AR15. Is his finger really that fast? What is "is"?

https://www.youtube....h?v=_U6tORrODJE

Glad you brought that up mr gun nut.

You can pull the trigger almost as quickly as an automatic to the point that if you getting shot, you ain't going to really notice the time lag.

So top that Pal.......
 
Glad you brought that up mr gun nut.

You can pull the trigger almost as quickly as an automatic to the point that if you getting shot, you ain't going to really notice the time lag.

So top that Pal.......

YOu obviously didn't click the link I provided. It shows just how easy it is to pull the trigger like a fully automatic and still have pretty decent control over what you are shooting at.

I know when it comes to guns, gun nuts like to stick to the Websters definition of "semi automatic". I'd prefer to hear you explain why the guy with the smirky smile in the video I linked to isn't using an automatic weapon.
 
YOu obviously didn't click the link I provided. It shows just how easy it is to pull the trigger like a fully automatic and still have pretty decent control over what you are shooting at.

I know when it comes to guns, gun nuts like to stick to the Websters definition of "semi automatic". I'd prefer to hear you explain why the guy with the smirky smile in the video I linked to isn't using an automatic weapon.

As you are being shot, will it matter if it was full auto or bump fire?
 
That depends on what your definition of is is. That's a lot of bullets for a "harmless semiautomatic" isn't it?
 
Bump fire stocks are legal and have the uncanny ability to allow a semiautomatic to operate just like a fully automatic. But it sure gets the righties to say things like "that depends on what your definitoin of "is" is ".
Since the investigation into the Newton shooting inculding the various search warrants posted online does not mention anything about Lanza's AR-15 being equiped with a bump fire stock, I'd say you're full of it. But we already knew that.
 

Latest posts

Back
Top