Bill Brasky
Veteran
- Joined
- May 15, 2008
- Messages
- 637
- Reaction score
- 1,060
What he doesn't say is that anything has to include the Nic. He says that for an "integration", presumably of the pilot groups, it needs to be answered, not for the merger of the two companies.So the court did not say.
"THE COURT: Well, it's a precondition to the integration that's contemplated by this merger."
Or
THE COURT: All right. And it sounds like no one in the Arizona litigation disputes the proposition that it is important to get a timely answer as quickly as possible, that is to the merits of that litigation, both for the parties -- those parties to be able to put the matter behind them and also that everyone understands that that issue needs to be resolved before integration in this merger would be addressed.
He also did NOT say which side would prevail, but according to Judge Silver and the Ninth Circuit USAPA already has.