What's new

April/May 2013 Pilot Discussion

Status
Not open for further replies.
Still thinking how your CLT boys crushed your little recall.

Our little recall ensured a vote on the MOU, that was a victory.


Charlotte Domicile Update

Friday, 22 February 2013 20:14

.....The management that just convinced us to give up our scope for pennies on the dollar is a worthy enough opponent alone, but we must also defend our pilots from current union leadership that has assisted management in accomplishing their goals of devaluing the provisions of our contract without nearly adequate returns.

...We can also report that the CLT recall attempt was extremely harmful in our effort to get you adequate returns. It couldn’t have happened at a worse time, and we are sure that management is delighted with the actions of the pilots who were behind it.
 
Our little recall ensured a vote on the MOU, that was a victory.


Charlotte Domicile Update

Friday, 22 February 2013 20:14

.....The management that just convinced us to give up our scope for pennies on the dollar is a worthy enough opponent alone, but we must also defend our pilots from current union leadership that has assisted management in accomplishing their goals of devaluing the provisions of our contract without nearly adequate returns.

...We can also report that the CLT recall attempt was extremely harmful in our effort to get you adequate returns. It couldn’t have happened at a worse time, and we are sure that management is delighted with the actions of the pilots who were behind it.
Didn't these idiots endorse the MOU? Didn't they recommend a Yes vote? How short of a memory do these lunatics think their constituents have?
 
Did I miss all the praise from westies for USAPA agreeing to let Judge Silver hear the case? Seems like you web board Perry Masons would be thrilled about that. Should speed things right along, maybe knock it down under 24 months unless it is dismissed.
It would seem that the company has come to the end of their patience also.

Defendant US Airline Pilots Association (“USAPA&rdquo😉 has filed a motion (Doc.
No. 9) seeking, inter alia, an extension of time to respond to the Complaint.
Defendant US Airways, Inc. (“US Airways&rdquo😉 remains neutral as to the merits of the
seniority dispute between Plaintiffs and USAPA that lies at the heart of the instant
lawsuit. It does, however, have an interest in the prompt resolution of the merits of this
dispute. Accordingly, US Airways respectfully submits that USAPA’s motion should be
denied.

Dated: April 8, 2013

The company want this case settled.
The west wants this case settled.
AMR wants this case settled.
The UCC wants this case settled.

Who is the odd man out in this little drama? Why?
 
Was there a point in that post?

What about my question? Aren't you happy that USAPA agrees with AOL to assign it to Judge Silver?

And BTW, your avatar makes you look pathetic, not the one you aimed it at.
usapa can agree that Silver might get it. That does not mean it goes to her. It could still end up with Wake or stay where it is. In spite of your opinion usapa does not get to decide these things.
 
It would seem that the company has come to the end of their patience also.



The company want this case settled.
The west wants this case settled.
AMR wants this case settled.
The UCC wants this case settled.

Who is the odd man out in this little drama? Why?

You guys wasted time with the SCOTUS on Addington I and with Judge Silver. You resisted USAPA's attempts to expedite the DJ appeal. Why?

Answer that question and I suspect you will find the answer to yours.
 
It happens rarely but, in the case of the NC boasting at LEC meetings that getting Nicolau was a bit of coup, I must agree with him.

Even a broken clock is correct twice a day.
Welcome to the 20th century. Not all clocks have hands. Broken digitals are never correct. Just like usapa.
 
You guys wasted time with the SCOTUS I and with Judge Silver. You resisted USAPA's attempts to expedite the DJ appeal. Why?

Answer that question and I suspect you will find the answer to yours.
Answer this question.

What would expediting the company DJ going to answer?

If the ninth agrees it is not ripe nothing changes and usapa still has to have an LUP.
The ninth decides it is ripe. The case goes back to Silver for trial or summary judgement. You think you were going to get an answer you like from Silver not constrained by ripeness?
 
Answer this question.

What would expediting the company DJ going to answer?

If the ninth agrees it is not ripe nothing changes and usapa still has to have an LUP.
The ninth decides it is ripe. The case goes back to Silver for trial or summary judgement. You think you were going to get an answer you like from Silver not constrained by ripeness?

I think it could clarify Silver's ruling.

The last DJ took what, almost a year, to get to the first hearing? What does Silver's docket look like now? Perhaps a ruling from the 9th would help frame the latest DJ. What harm does expediting it do? If you don't think we would get an answer we like with ripeness gone, why not go along with expediting it?

How long do you see this DJ taking from start to finish?
 
Come on quick draw clear, what's your answer? Got to call Marty?
 
You mean like the way we selected Nicolau for the America West merger after he arbitrated the Shuttle merger for us?
Dan, the topic was about the Continental/ United sli. Do you think that either of them would pick old George to arbitrate their list? I say no way.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Latest posts

Back
Top