west pilots, your company agrees with you, you are in a class by yourself. (on your own vs East).
If any labor group has their company agree with them in court, unsolicited, it should be a big red flag for youse guys.
"Plaintiffs have filed a motion pursuant to Rules 23(a) and 23((1)(A) of the
Federal Rules of Civil Procedure seeking certification of the following class: “All pilots who are on the America West seniority list currently incorporated into the West Pilot’s collective bargaining agreement.” (Motion for Class Certification (Doc. No. 11), at
p. 3:15-17 (page citation refers to pagination in plaintiffs’ motion and not to the
pagination of the corresponding ECF filing).)
Although defendant US Airways, Inc. (“US Airways&rdquo😉 does not necessarily agree
with all of plaintiffs’ arguments, it does agree that plaintiffs’ motion satisfies the
requirements of Rules 23(a) and 23((1)(a).
Accordingly, US Airways respectfully submits that plaintiffs’ motion should be
granted.
Dated: April 11, 2013. O’Melveny & Myers LLP
By: /s/Robert A. Siegel
Robert A. Siegel (pro hac vice)
Chris A. Hollinger (pro hac vice)
400 South Hope Street, Suite 1500
Los Angeles, California 90071-2899
US Airways, Inc.
Karen Gillen, State Bar No. 018008
111 W. Rio Salado Parkway
Tempe, AZ 85281
Attorneys for Defendant
If any labor group has their company agree with them in court, unsolicited, it should be a big red flag for youse guys.
"Plaintiffs have filed a motion pursuant to Rules 23(a) and 23((1)(A) of the
Federal Rules of Civil Procedure seeking certification of the following class: “All pilots who are on the America West seniority list currently incorporated into the West Pilot’s collective bargaining agreement.” (Motion for Class Certification (Doc. No. 11), at
p. 3:15-17 (page citation refers to pagination in plaintiffs’ motion and not to the
pagination of the corresponding ECF filing).)
Although defendant US Airways, Inc. (“US Airways&rdquo😉 does not necessarily agree
with all of plaintiffs’ arguments, it does agree that plaintiffs’ motion satisfies the
requirements of Rules 23(a) and 23((1)(a).
Accordingly, US Airways respectfully submits that plaintiffs’ motion should be
granted.
Dated: April 11, 2013. O’Melveny & Myers LLP
By: /s/Robert A. Siegel
Robert A. Siegel (pro hac vice)
Chris A. Hollinger (pro hac vice)
400 South Hope Street, Suite 1500
Los Angeles, California 90071-2899
US Airways, Inc.
Karen Gillen, State Bar No. 018008
111 W. Rio Salado Parkway
Tempe, AZ 85281
Attorneys for Defendant