What's new

April/May 2013 Pilot Discussion

Status
Not open for further replies.
NO, YOU'RE the IDIOT. Whom are we to believe knows the law better, you or the Judge?

I now see why you are so sensitive. You just SHOWED THE WORLD how stupid you are by saying that you know more than the Judge.

What a MORON! Yes, YOU.

What a piece of work. If by work I mean crap!

Cleardirect has done a massive injustice to the western pilots. First the "binding" arbitration which turned out to be false. Then the Magic MOU which was touted to be a JCBA. Next USAPA late filing, now the Leonidas group gets slapped hard for their faulty filings.
It is honestly sad to watch the lengthy rumblings of falsehoods foisted.
He has to be one of the ones pushing Resdoyalpolygraph to the edge. Just get a load of his rambling meltdowns. Unbelievable.
 
NO, YOU'RE the IDIOT. Whom are we to believe knows the law better, you or the Judge?

Be gentle here friend. You're addressing people who've (through their astoundingly all-encompassing legal expertise) previously observed that even the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals "got it wrong"...well...at least, according to the AOL brain trust.
 
"Never saw it at AWA... I have to say that AWA pilots also tend to be the cheapest bastards out there - if it's for free, and they think that they are entitled to it, they'd be the first ones jumping up and down in order to try to get it."

Hmm. So where are all the FA's that, without possible doubt, should be vociferously defending "you'se" guys against such obviously unfair slander, by touting your group's universal virtues!? I'd have thought that just your "Integrity Matters" T-shirts alone should have prevented this sort of insult!!! I'll naturally suggest AOL and all the mighty "spartans" file a buncha' worthless lawsuits against this type of unquestionably unwarranted denigration immediately! 🙂 Moreover; as supposed "knights" who've, within the feverish fantasies of your fine videos; "fought with valor in many battles" in "war", well...you certainly shouldn't take such affrontery lying down! 😉 Rise up mighty "spartans" and show those FA's just what's what and who's who here! Good luck with them being much impressed by your noble efforts.

It's a mischaracterization by a dude who obviously has a huge chip on his shoulders.

The discussion is already going on about East FA's going West.

Here's a sample:

"The ENTIRE crew treated me like royalty on that flight. It was a very pleasant experience, and I can only hope to show them the same level of hospitality and professionalism when they do come here."

"....I have flown USAirways int'l a lot, and have had nothing but friendly treatment from the east FA's....even when they knew I am west....and even domestically, they are usually friendly."

"I sure hope we don't have any pilots that are resentful of these senior east FAs bidding PHX and are nasty or treat em like crap."

"I see no reason to treat the cabin crew members poorly simply because they were east folk."

So East, based on the comments above, would you say ContinueUS is accurate?
 
It's obvious that my once per week visit to this forum is a total waste of time.

Claxon(hole): Still an idiot. Still grabbing as straws. I wonder what you will say when the Nic list is (soon) rammed firmly up your ass. You too, Jamie. Looking forward to it.
Easy Dodger.
 
So East, based on the comments above, would you say ContinueUS is accurate?

Not being an FA; I've no real idea, and I'm sure there are those on both sides of the Ole' Miss that've sometimes had grief with the pilots they work with. Any man who honestly judges an entire group of people by a select number of complete fools proves himself one in the process. Targeting your more, umm..."colorful", complete village idiots serves to amuse. I mean c'mon, be fair here; "spartans", "knights" and even "dire wolves", not to mention pure bastions of "Integrity"...Seriously? 🙂 How could anyone anywhere, not derisively chuckle at such infantile nonsense? 😉 Frankly; how any person like yourself can offer up support for something so egregiously insane that it'd place a new hire ahead of anyone with, I believe it was at or near 17 full years of unbroken service, will never be fully understood by me, and represents nothing more than narcicisstic greed in extremis to my thinking, that's fully worth any abundance of barbs and jabs offered.

Oh Well. This thread is nowadays, purely for grins and/or the passage of mutual nyaah-nyaahs. With the acceptance of the MOU; the course is set, and no changed moods or opinions, nor any amount of shouting will make one iota of difference.
 
Be gentle here friend. You're addressing people who've (through their astoundingly all-encompassing legal expertise) previously observed that even the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals "got it wrong"...well...at least, according to the AOL brain trust.
And of course dissenting justice Bybee.
 
"You're addressing people who've.... previously observed that even the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals "got it wrong".

And of course dissenting justice Bybee.

So only a dissenting justice to the actual ruling got it "right"? Thanks for enhancing my point.
 
So idiot.

Which one of these is not like the others? One of these is the title page from the court. We can assume that the court since they pointed out the rule would follow it. One of these is from the company and one of these is from usapa.

Which party used upper and lower case and which party only used upper case?

Who do you think would get the local rule correct? The lawyers that work in the court everyday or the guys from out of town? Do I need to list which party filed what heading or can you figure it out?

The Honorable Judge Rosenblatt quote below;

"IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that all future documents filed in this action must be captioned according to the party capitalization requirement of LRCiv

7.1(a)(3) (“Party names must be capitalized using proper upper and lower case"



28J Jacobs, April 8th

CityScape
One East Washington St., Suite 1200
Phoenix, AZ 85004
Phone: (602) 650-2000
Fax: (602) 264-7033
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA
Don ADDINGTON; et al.,
Plaintiffs,
vs.
US AIRLINE PILOTS ASS’N, et al.,
Defendants.
CASE NO. 2:13-CV-00471-PGR
Declaration of Andrew Jacob
I,

The Judge April 9th

Don Addington, et al.,
Plaintiffs,
vs.
US Airline Pilots Ass’n, et al.
Defendants.
)))))))))))
No. CV-13-00471-PHX-PGR
ORDER
Pending before the Court is Plaintiffs’ Motion for Entry of Default Judgment
by the Court Pursuant to Rule 55( B)(2), filed April 8, 2013, wherein the plaintiffs

28J Jacobs and Marty April 10, after the spanking for the
"inexplicable" motion

Marty Harper (#003416)
mharper@polsinelli.com
Andrew S. Jacob (#22516)
ajacob@polsinelli.com
Jennifer Axel (#023883)
jaxel@polsinelli.com
POLSINELLI SHUGHART, P.C.
CityScape
One East Washington St., Suite 1200
Phoenix, AZ 85004
Phone: (602) 650-2000
Fax: (602) 264-7033
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA
Don Addington; et al.,
Plaintiffs,
vs.
US Airline Pilots Ass’n, et al.,
Defendants.
Case No. 2:13-CV-00471-PGR
Reply On Motion To Transfer Case To
Judge Wake Or Judge Silver
 
"You're addressing people who've.... previously observed that even the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals "got it wrong".



So only a dissenting justice to the actual ruling got it "right"? Thanks for enhancing my point.
Well I do think Bybee got it right, but that's not what I said.

You said the "AOL brain trust" (whoever that is) with their "astoundingly all-encompassing legal expertise ... got it wrong". I was just clarifying that Bybee in his official dissenting opinion clearly articulated that he believed his colleagues on the court were misinterpreting and distorting the ripeness doctrine and that the merits should have been considered within the court's jurisdiction. Furthermore, he believed that judge Wake was correct that any attempt by USAPA to set aside the NIC would harm the west pilots and that there was no legitimate union purpose for taking such an action by a CBA that is duly appointed to represent all LCC pilots, not just a favored class.
 
....all LCC pilots, not just a favored class.

Contemplate that a bit longer, oh ye who mightilly strive to become a "favored class" via the nic obscenity. 😉

Methinks your "noble cause" and holy quest for the greed-soaked grail is just so much dust under misguided chariot wheels at this point.
 
NO, YOU'RE the IDIOT. Whom are we to believe knows the law better, you or the Judge?

I now see why you are so sensitive. You just SHOWED THE WORLD how stupid you are by saying that you know more than the Judge.

What a MORON! Yes, YOU.

What a piece of work, If by work I mean crap!

Say the guy that think judge Wake got it wrong and mishandled the case.

What is it. Are judges always right or do they make mistakes?

I think you can read. What does 55(a) say? Is the west asking for money? If not 55(a) does not apply.

Next question which party got the block heading wrong? The west or usapa?
 
Say the guy that think judge Wake got it wrong and mishandled the case.

What is it. Are judges always right or do they make mistakes?

I think you can read. What does 55(a) say? Is the west asking for money? If not 55(a) does not apply.

Next question which party got the block heading wrong? The west or usapa?
"block heading" ?

Do you mean block altitude sir?
 
Say the guy that think judge Wake got it wrong and mishandled the case.

What is it. Are judges always right or do they make mistakes?

I think you can read. What does 55(a) say? Is the west asking for money? If not 55(a) does not apply.

Next question which party got the block heading wrong? The west or usapa?

Clear Direct, the Yogi Berra of the west pilot group.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BFHlkVqhWKQ
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Latest posts

Back
Top