What's new

AUG/SEPT 2012 US Pilots Labor Discussion

Status
Not open for further replies.
All this time and Luv9 doesn't even know what Silver is going to rule on, nor does he really grasp what the 9th said.

He's given me a new found faith in sterotypes!

Funny. I was thinking the same thing. His comprehension is right up there with claxon/mm.
 
1. I'm not so young. 2. We're fighting in court like civilized people but if you really want a duel then let's put on the gloves. 3. Nothing melodramatic or misplaced on my part. You fools melodramatically denied a final and binding agreement and we stood up to you. Your misplaced sense of self importance allowed you to think you would get away with it.

See you at oral arguments on the 26th? Bring your boxing gloves.

I think USAPA plans on bringing Roland Wilder, and the 9ths discussions. That should be enough.
 
USAPA's countermanding of the MOU negotiations should go over well.
As if were relevant to start with. Silver better call Wake and rehash how far a judge can go with this. If she doesn't it is back to the 9th.
 
Says the guy with a picture of a disgraced East pilot as his avatar.

Says the pilot who is know as a traitor among his fellow workers. By the way, you are going to need a lot more names on that list. That list is shorter than a single 330 crew.
 
Says the pilot who is know as a traitor among his fellow workers. By the way, you are going to need a lot more names on that list. That list is shorter than a single 330 crew.

Traitor? Is that because he might think that trying to staple the west pilots to the bottom of the list may not have been the right course of action? When you're tired of trying to staple us and having management use it as a tool to hold you on loa 93, please let us know. You can even call collect🙂

Bean
 
I think USAPA plans on bringing Roland Wilder, and the 9ths discussions. That should be enough.

More than enough.....

.......are you in for a rude awakening? Cause, I am thinking Silver is going to give you a decision that affirms the 9th, and will be basically appeal proof.

Simply put, on appeal the 9th will say, we already told you morons this, judge, Silver now affirms...and since you are too stupid to get a hint, even when it is a direct statement, we are not talking to you again.

Too bad for the seniority thieves. They had Seeham, now Wilder (the other third stringer), getting them all worked up over stealing someone else's job in a pseudo-legitimate fashion, that we are going to have to put the scabs on suicide watch when Silver tells them that...um..yes, indeed...final and binding arbitration is both final and binding......duhhhhh. Oh, and a company that breaches a contract to appease scabs best have some pretty deep pockets.
 
As if were relevant to start with. Silver better call Wake and rehash how far a judge can go with this. If she doesn't it is back to the 9th.

Know of any unions with an injunction against them that are parked by the NMB?

The reason I ask is pretty simple. Go read the company's DJ again. Seems to me the company is still under threat of a hybrid DFR......but not a release to self-help and the strike uscaba promised.


Silver can go as far as she wants...as long as she simply tells the company, usapa must negotiate for "all LCC pilots". That is exactly what the 9th circus told usapa, and the obvious gaping hole in the Seeham scab plan.


One other thing....you do realize that after Silver affirms the 9th.....if usapa does not forward the NIc as its section 22 seniority list, and seek to gain "all LCC pilots" a contract......DFRII gets filed, and this time, we don't need a contract for the charge to be ripe.

Ever heard of a system bump and flush? Get familiar with that junior.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Latest posts

Back
Top