“Do I believe in arbitration? I do. But not in arbitration between the lion and the lamb, in which the lamb is in the morning found inside the lion.”"Arbitration is powerful evidence of a fair result" - Judge Silver. And not a word about a LUP other than "the majority rules".
The message had nothing to do with it....just pointing out the way you have always posted when you don't like something. There is a pattern.Not surprising you would fall back on undercutting a poster because you didn't like the message. And I'm sure Jerry doesn't appreciate his initials being thrown around here.
"Arbitration is powerful evidence of a fair result" - Judge Silver. And not a word about a LUP other than "the majority rules".
Gee. That is exactly the decision you eastie were going to have to make. Get a new contract with the Nicolau in it or remain on LOA 93. Just because a merger came along does not change your obligation.That's not what happened. The MOU renegotiated the TA and previous contracts because the union knew that we were being left behind. It negotiated better pay for ALL US pilots and it was up to the pilots to look at the changes and cast a vote as to whether it was better to stay in our quagmire and let our merger partner that was in Chp 11 reap the benefits while we continued to fight it out, or accept the changes and get the money. It was laid out, and we voted on it, with the west pilots voting for it 97%.
I feel confident that is what the union will say, because what else is there/
But, show your integrity. Wasn't it your plan all along to vote for the MOU knowing it didn't include the Nic, and then file suit claiming it was illegal? So you turned your back on an agreed upon contract. Sound familiar?
But, show your integrity. Wasn't it your plan all along to vote for the MOU knowing it didn't include the Nic, and then file suit claiming it was illegal? So you turned your back on an agreed upon contract. Sound familiar?
Seems no west pilots want to address why voting for an MOU with the intention of declaring it illegal is just the same as not accepting binding arbitration.
I would be happy to address it. I believe it to be much akin to the moral relativism of the entire black community in that it's OK for someone (as long as you are not a Caucasian male), to break another's nose, straddle another, and bash his head repeatedly against a sidewalk. But, when the "big ace" gets played, to cry that it somehow wasn't fair. In the words of Trayvon, "You got me!" The way that I see it, and from what I read of Friday"s transcripts, you are looking for some kind of respite or absolution from the events of the last six years. It sounds somewhat to me, like you just wish to wash, both your "hands and feet" of the entire affair. Some sort of, "What she did was just as bad as what I did..." Good Luck! I recommend that you schedule a few sessions with the "pedantic psycho-therapeutic putz", who posts here so regularly, and see if he will grant you any absolution. Cheers!!! and don't scrape the tail on your way out.....Seems no west pilots want to address why voting for an MOU with the intention of declaring it illegal is just the same as not accepting binding arbitration.
Dang... can't revise the last post to ask just this; Have you ever played chess with someone that just seemed to see the board a few more moves ahead than yourself? That's exactly how it feels. You can always just concede or "topple your king". Maybe it might somehow abbreviate the pain. Cheers! (Max pitch 10 degrees, or whatever a B737-400 is...) Curses!!! Sullyed again!Seems no west pilots want to address why voting for an MOU with the intention of declaring it illegal is just the same as not accepting binding arbitration.
Your Mom is hot.
Now you have a west friend? Stirring the pot? It's "we" Pi. Just because you don't know me doesn't mean I'm not east.