traderjake
Veteran
- Joined
- Aug 30, 2002
- Messages
- 5,669
- Reaction score
- 9,308
If you are here grousing then you are here grousing.
And here you are grousing about grousing.

If you are here grousing then you are here grousing.
What was given the greater weight in the award, slotting or LOS?
UAL proposal was adopted almost in it's entirety with one major exception. The 50/50 status-category/longevity ratio was altered to 65/35. So Longevity was only given a 35% weighting.
Both sides are grumbling,
Status-Category was given twice the weighting as LOS.
Ask yourself, why did we end up having to go to arbitration in the first place?
Bean
Bottom line is that your all or nothing DOH stance sealed your fate
And here you are grousing about grousing.![]()
Name a recent SLI that didn't go to arbitration.
I already said I felt longevity should matter. Ask yourself, why did we end up having to go to arbitration in the first place? If I remember correctly it wasn't because the west drew a hard line on longevity or furloughs, it was DOH. You still have pilots on the east trying to control the union and push for it. I just read the new CAL/UAL list and it is most certainly not DOH.
I didn't know wanting to be a line holding group 2 FO in PHX was selfish. After all, that's what I was prior to the merger. Silly me, I keep forgetting that the merger was for the sole benefit of the east.
Bean
Absolutely untrue.
You can't count VOLUNTARY furloughs, as some of them are VERY senior and still hold their relative position. The highest involuntary furlough is about 86%, and nowhere near a Captain bid anywhere in the system. About 700+ furloughs were placed with active CAL pilots. Also, UA furloughees would be the first ones subject to another furlough (out of seniority order) in a future head count reduction. (any of you easties ever consider offering that gem up?)
This is nothing even close to a DOH integration. Went much closer to relative seniority. No special carve out for WB positions. Hybrid method was definitely a creative work of art. CAL proposal was categorically dismissed as a blatant seniority grab. UAL proposal was adopted almost in it's entirety with one major exception. The 50/50 status-category/longevity ratio was altered to 65/35. So Longevity was only given a 35% weighting. Bottom 1/3 of UA list loses 7 to 8+ years. UA was shown to be the stronger airline financially at the 2010 merger date, although both needed a partner for future success.
Conditions and restrictions are minimal and weak. Arbitrators reaffirmed their reluctance to complicated conditions and restrictions. All fences come down in 5 years or after 25th 787, which will actually be in about 2-3 years. CAL gets all the benefit of UA's MUCH larger widebody fleet,and domicile advantage. (How many Guam/EWR pilots will prefer to live in LAX/SFO/DEN/IAD/ORD???)
UA side feels vindicated by arbitrator's written opinion of the award. Both sides are grumbling, but CAL side probably more so since Katz did his typical poor job of managing expectations. (Sound familiar, easties?)
Bottom line is that your all or nothing DOH stance sealed your fate. Had you attempted to get a little creative, and discussed longevity weighted against category/status, you would have come up with a better deal in arbitration, saving yourselves from years of legal fees, ridiculously high union dues, and lost wages and benefits. You decided to go "all in" and have paid the price. UAL and CAL have now taken our lumps, will accept the result of binding arbitration, and move on. (huh... what a concept.)
.Or are you admitting to grousing too? I think you fit in just fine if you are honest that you are grousing!![]()
You never answered my question. When did US liquidate?