What's new

Company's Offer

First off I will say I apologize for the outburst. I had a acouple to many last night.
Second I am not a troll.
Third I will stick to what I said, but cleaner. People like yourself have their own opinions, which I may not agree with, but accept. I will stay with what I said, we are in economical downturn, outsourcing is becoming the norm.
I am not happy with the proposal, but at this time with 125 dollar oil, the company back to its losing ways, I could live with it.
Am I happy with the execs bonus's, no and will never understand why they did it.
But if this is the best we get so be it.
Everyone wants what we had in 2001, its just not going to happen. If the airline did shutdown where would you me and the rest of the twu be. On the streets.

A difference of opinion is one thing. Following blindly is another.

You claim you do not like what happened. (Hard to tell since you do not indicate if you are in the int. or not because intl. reps. do not take pay cuts.) Economical downturn? For how long? Forever? Two days? Listen, once a contract is signed the company will make money hand over fist and tell us we can't open the contract because we signed it, just like the company did after we signed a 6 year contract.

There is NO reason why we can not be given what I state. None what so ever. Don't cry about oil being $125 + and climbing. What will you do IF you vote a proposal like this one and the company comes back to you AGAIN singing the blues? Will you grab your ankles again?

You want a difference of opinions that's fine. But at least I am willing to fight for what I deserve instead of accepting scraps from underneath the table when ever they fall.

This proposal was turned down by the neg. committee. But I am sure that there were some, like yourself... if you aren't one of the negotiators... who voted to bring this to a vote. I say that each Local Member should demand how their negotiators voted on this proposal. I would hate to know that my negotiators are like this poster.
 
A "VEBA" Like UAW?

Situation
1. Historic new way to fund UAW retiree health benefits may fall short on promises
2. If money runs out, 750K retired auto workers/spouses may have to rely on Medicare
3. VEBAs won't take effect until 2010, require court-approval process to begin
4. Sean McAlinden, Center for Automotive Research, says VEBA money will last


Significant Points
1. UAW cannot keep commitments w/o national healthcare program, say experts
2. Federal program would have to be initiated within 5-15 years, say experts
3. UAW, automakers won't reveal member ages, other crucial factors
4. Life expectancies, investment returns, health care cost inflation all factors


Says
"They've [UAW] got ridiculous assumptions on health care costs. It's not even close to being realistic, it's preposterous." -- Lance Wallach, VEBA consultant, New York City area

"It [VEBA] will last 80 years because it is a Big Pile of money. GM retirees and the active UAW labor force are quite elderly. Eighty years from now, only a handful will be left--maybe no one." -- Sean McAlinden, chief economist, Center for Automotive Research
 
INTERESTING INFORMATION

ARTICLE 41-BENEFITS
•
CREATE A JOINT COMMITTEE TO EXPLORE IMPLEMENTATION OF A VEBA TRUST ADMINISTERED BY THE TWU SIMILAR TO THE AGREEMENT BETWEEN UAW AND GENERAL MOTORS


__________________________________________
PLEASE NOTE THE BELOW INFORMATION:
UAW-GM House of Cards VEBA
__________________________________________

GM-UAW VEBA Deal Described As ‘House of Cards’
In a follow up to his initial 4-page Memorandum on the GM-UAW VEBA Agreement, Santa Clara Law Professor, Stephen Diamond offers additional information on one of the central arguments the UAW has offered for negotiating the VEBA---“protection†in case GM goes bankrupt. Professor Diamond effectively demonstrates, using the negotiators own document, that this claim is false and that the VEBA provides no such security.

Contact Info: Stephen Diamond 650-867-0434
http://www.scu.edu/law/faculty/profile/diamond-stephen.cfm



MEMORANDUM



To: Jerry Tucker, Paul Schrade and Warren Davis, UAW IEB (Retired)
From: Stephen Diamond, School of Law, Santa Clara University
Date: October 2, 2007
RE: Proposed GM/UAW VEBA: A House of Cards?


My initial assessment of the Proposed GM/UAW VEBA concentrated on the implications of the proposed sale of the Convertible Note to the VEBA. I have now had the opportunity to assess more fully the Memorandum of Understanding covering the VEBA that the UAW has made available to its members in advance of the contract ratification vote. This MOU makes clear that the entire VEBA structure fails to secure future health care obligations from the potential risk of GM bankruptcy. To put it succinctly, the VEBA structure can be said to balance like a house of cards completely subject to the ups and downs of GM’s financial future. If GM collapses into bankruptcy it is very likely that the VEBA will also collapse.

The basis of this conclusion is simple: according to the MOU GM retains unilateral power to make up to $7 billion of its potential contributions to the VEBA in cash over a twelve to twenty year period through annual payments. Since these payments are to be made in cash they depend entirely on the availability of that cash from GM. But if GM declares bankruptcy there is no means to guarantee now that the cash will be available or that GM will not use the bankruptcy process to shield itself from these future payment obligations. This compounds the problems associated with the Convertible Note whose value rises and falls with GM stock and whose annual interest payment and return of principal could be blocked in bankruptcy.

Let me describe this process more fully. The new VEBA will take over health care obligations from GM on January 1, 2008. In theory, the new VEBA will have assets on hand on that date from several sources:

The Convertible Note ($4.4 billion)
Current assets of smaller existing GM VEBA’s (value unknown)
Diversion of promised wage and COLA increases to the new VEBA ($3.8 billion)
A base payment ($1.8 billion)
A “contingent cash payment†(amount unknown) and
Annual Shortfall payments to be made if the VEBA does not have adequate funding to meet its obligations (currently valued at $1.6 billion)



However, GM can at its discretion stage up to $7 billion of this amount (including the Wages/COLA payment, the Base payment and the Shortfall payments) as far into the future as 2027. As an example, if GM elects to pay its obligations in those three categories in cash annually, it is projected in the MOU that in Year Five of the VEBA (2013) GM will owe an annual payment to the VEBA of $631 million, assuming a Shortfall payment is required. If GM in that same year wanted to pay down its entire future obligation to the VEBA it would have to pay $7.3 billion.


Since those future payments are to be made in cash they are subject to GM having the cash on hand to make the payments. In addition, as liabilities of GM they could potentially be cancelled if GM declares bankruptcy, thus leaving the VEBA on its own without sufficient assets to meet the health care needs of UAW retirees.


This Is Not A Risk Current & Future UAW-GM Retirees Should Take!

This really doesn't look like something a TWU member should consider a good me too clause regarding Retirement Medical Benefits. But then again, we are represented by the company union man Jim Little who without a doubt has been leading this negotiating committee from the start.

STUPID IS AS STUPID DOES
 
More on UAW/GM VEBA

-------

Auto Makers Push VEBA Solution for Industry Crisis
— Chris Kutalik


Mike Konopacki. Click for pop-up.A rising chorus of business gurus is singing the praises of a new solution to the U.S. auto industry’s ongoing crisis: one big health care trust for all the Big 3’s workers. According to the proposal’s cheerleaders, by making giant one-time pay-ins the Big 3 auto makers can slice off an estimated $116 billion worth of retiree health obligations from their balance sheets in one swoop and restore profitability.

What’s more, union members will gain too because the money and future administration of retiree health care will be placed in the hands of a massive UAW-administered trust, called a Voluntary Employees Beneficiary Association (VEBA).

A simple win-win for all, right?

“Wrong,â€￾ say a growing number of United Auto Workers members. UAW rank and filers, including members of the UAW rank-and-file group Soldiers of Solidarity, have launched a campaign to demand that all plans for such a solution be dropped in current contract negotiations.

In one campaign leaflet these workers say that VEBA really stands for “Vandalize Employee Benefits Againâ€￾ and that the plan will allow “the company to walk away from retiree health care commitments, and shift all the risk.â€￾

But what exactly is a VEBA?

On the surface, a VEBA is nothing more than a federally recognized non-profit 501© (9) corporation set up to insure that health care, pension, unemployment, or other benefits are routinely paid out to workers covered by the trust.

According to the non-profit monitoring service Guidestar, there are at least 2,700 VEBAs already in existence for union and non-union employees in industries ranging from steel to utilities to telecommunications. Indeed, several of them already exist (mostly to dole out unemployment money) for Big-3 companies or major auto part suppliers like Visteon, Delphi, Dana, and Johnson Controls.

VEBA RED FLAGS
On closer examination, however, red flags pop up for union members in several critical areas.

For one, many of the trusts start off under-funded. In fact, business analysts claim that this under-funding is one of the key advantages of a Big-3 VEBA solution. They point to the success of Goodyear Tires in dumping $1.3 billion of retiree health care obligations in favor of a $1 billion lump sum payment into a VEBA in the wake of the settlement of its grueling strike with the Steelworkers in late 2006.

Business analyst Mark Oline told Financial Week that General Motors may be only willing or able to offer less than $35 billion of the estimated $50 billion that it owes retired workers. Ford was estimated to only be able to put $13 billion of $17 billion, while Chrysler, with mounting financial pressures from its recent buyout by Cerberus, remained unknown in what it is expected to offer.

UAW members fear that under-funding could lead to a simple, grim arithmetic: each dollar shortchanged will presumably translate into a dollar that can’t be spent on health care premiums, co-pays, deductibles, or quality of care. Under a VEBA, the remaining costs of maintaining health care benefits will have to be shifted back to the workers themselves.

“VEBA shortchanges retirees on benefits they already earned because it is underfunded upfront,â€￾ said Gregg Shotwell, a member of UAW Local 2151. “Exchanging dimes for dollars does not make sense. Whatever the company stands to save, retirees stand to lose. Eventually, it will put the union in charge of demanding retirees pay more out of pocket to make up for the short fall.â€￾

Skyrocketing health care costs or an economic downturn may make an under-funded Big-3 VEBA into even more of a loser for workers. “God help us if we go into a depression or recession,â€￾ former UAW President Douglas Fraser commented to The Washington Post, “and the value of the fund plummets and the UAW is sitting there with this huge liability.â€￾

Moreover, that liability may be more than financial—it may also be political. By taking on the role of health care administrator, the union could be forced into a compromised position, having to potentially limit or cut benefits for the workers it represents.

REAL DANGERS
These pitfalls are not merely hypothetical. They have already occurred with disastrous results for workers inside the UAW.

Following the signing of a concessionary two-tiered contract in January 2005, workers at Caterpillar found themselves with a bankrupt VEBA. According to the Caterpillar VEBA’s 2005 tax filing, the fund paid out $1,350,131 while only having $1,345,186 left in contributions, leaving it owing $4,500.

Retired Caterpillar workers expecting to draw from the fund suffered from the shortfall. They were left to deal with dramatic increases in co-pays, premiums, and deductibles despite previous agreements to protect them.

“I knew I had paid for my lifetime health care coverage through the wage and benefit structure of all the previous contracts I worked under, but this agreement vetoed them all,â€￾ retired Caterpillar worker and former UAW Local 751 President Larry Solomon wrote in Labor Notes at the time. “My wife and I will be paying $118/month premiums in 2005, and these will increase each year to a projected $332 by 2010.â€￾

Fed-up with the inaction of UAW International leadership, members filed a federal class-action lawsuit against Caterpillar in May 2007. According to Shotwell, the case is still pending in the courts and in a final twist “now Caterpillar is suing the UAW because they should have prevented retirees from suing the company.â€￾

A similar case occurred again at Detroit Diesel. Set up in 1993 to fund retiree benefits, the joint company-and-UAW-administered fund was exhausted by 2004. Saddled with sudden out-of-pocket health care costs, three Detroit Diesel members turned to the courts in desperation, filing a class action suit in January 2007 in defense of the 1,126 affected retirees and surviving family members.

In certain cases, employers can even raid a VEBA’s funds after it has been set up to fund capital expenditures. In 2000, General Motors shifted $1 billion from a VEBA that covered members of the UAW and other unions, according to William Hanline, a member of UAW Local 2195 in Decatur, Alabama. GM spent $500 million of the $1 billion on investments in Suzuki plants and another $500 million to boost the profits of its financing arm, GMAC.

DROPPING VEBA
With these dangers in mind, anti-VEBA UAW members are hoping that they can put up enough resistance to force VEBA plans to be dropped. They plan on distributing flyers and lobbying fellow members at Labor Day parades, union picnics, and other events throughout Michigan.

They also plan on taking the fight beyond just a defensive one around stopping VEBA. Many members are advocating a more far-reaching solution to the auto industry’s health care crisis: a national single-payer health care system for all workers.

“The union is not a financial institution,â€￾ said Shotwell. “The union’s purpose is to advance social justice not manage the retreat from corporate accountability.â€￾
 
“The union is not a financial institution,â€￾ said Shotwell. “The union’s purpose is to advance social justice not manage the retreat from corporate accountability.â€￾
Well stated.

The twu international should write this quote ten thousand times until it sinks in
 
I noticed in the notice put out by Steve Luis that it would "be in our best interests to come to the union meeting".

Gee - is he going to send Guido and Vido to break my legs if I don't show up? :shock:

Am I going to be told in person how hard the negotiating committee worked pushing papers across the table? 🙄

Do we get a new T-shirt guaranteed to scare the hell out of management? :angry:

Are we trying to keep secrets from management? :lol:

An old Navy saying re: his posterior and bilgewater comes to mind.
 
It has been argued by some that due to current economic conditions that this offer should be considered. In the years I worked for aa I never heard at any time that things were good. First the transition plan, then Jr. everything pay scales, and medical benefits that are terrible. And that was during the 90's. I found a job with better pay and bene's, half the guys I work with are ex- AMT's. The point is that with pay erosion within a few years the co. will be competitive with retail stores. There is a world out there that will pay for skills and hard work, don't sell yourself short. I had worked at the airport for 22 years and was convinced that there was nothing else out there and was terrified to leave. That may not be an option for everyone, but I'd strike before I'd go down another deal like this.
 
I would definitely attend this meeting.
I could not imagine why anyone would want to miss it under these circumstances.
Good ,bad,ugly and bull, I will listen to it and ask all the questions I can.
I can definitely afford to spent a couple of hours , on an issue of such importance.
 
Well stated.

The twu international should write this quote ten thousand times until it sinks in

The members should be the ones to accept or turn down.

Negotiators for union mechanics and bag handlers at American Airlines have rejected a contract proposal from American Airlines that called for lump-sum payments instead of wage increases.


The union's top leaders recommended that rank-and-file employees be allowed to vote on the proposal, but the negotiating committee for the Transport Workers union rejected the package.

American, the nation's largest carrier, said the union rejected a comprehensive proposal that included additional vacation and sick leave while recognizing "the economic realities facing the industry and our company."

American's parent, Fort Worth-based AMR Corp., lost $328 million in the first quarter, due largely to record prices for jet fuel.

"In addition, American's labor costs are the highest in the industry," the company said on the Web site. "While we could not address structural increases at this time, the tentative agreement did include improvements in pay and paid time off for TWU-represented employees."

James C. Little, the TWU's international president, said Saturday that he and the international organization recommended that the company's proposal be submitted to members for a vote. Little, however, didn't endorse the package, which fell short of the union's goal of restoring wages and benefits that were lost in 2003 and only covered two years.

"It doesn't meet all our needs, but there is an upside to this," Little said. "The recommendation from international was to let the members decide because of the uncertainty of the industry" and workers' own financial concerns.

Little said the union might next ask for help from federal mediators.

American's proposal called for lump sum payments upon signing of 5 percent of a worker's pay excluding overtime earnings, and 3.5 percent of such pay a year later. The airline also indicated it would explore "variable" pay tied to corporate and local business results.

The company would have added one holiday this year and two next year and increased holiday pay to double-time pay from time-and-a-half. Sick leave would have risen to six days this year and eight next year, from five.

It also would have adopted a new profit-sharing plan. Unlike counterparts at Continental Airlines Inc., American's union employees haven't received profit sharing the past two years because profits were too small to trigger awards.

American is also negotiating over a new contract with pilots -- talks have made little progress so far, according to the union -- and soon with flight attendants. Union employees are working under wage and benefit concessions that were approved in 2003, when the company was close to bankruptcy.
 
I noticed in the notice put out by Steve Luis that it would "be in our best interests to come to the union meeting".

Gee - is he going to send Guido and Vido to break my legs if I don't show up? :shock:

Am I going to be told in person how hard the negotiating committee worked pushing papers across the table? 🙄

Do we get a new T-shirt guaranteed to scare the hell out of management? :angry:

Are we trying to keep secrets from management? :lol:

An old Navy saying re: his posterior and bilgewater comes to mind.

No Goose.
I think they want more to attend the meeting as spineless witnesses in case someone turns the bat to their knee caps.
Remember when Burchett brought the last proposal ? Meeting goers kissed his a$$ and drank the Jim Jones Kool-Aid.
An Aircraft Cleaner during a "question and answer session" (an open session) had the balls to stand up and protest the last proposal.
He was called out of order and almost thrown out. (and several times therafter)
An AIRCRAFT CLEANER !!
Burchett, E-Boarders and Mechanics in the meeting crowd told the guy to sit down and be quite.
If you need a name of that A/C cleaner ...it was me !!
I was bumped down to A/C Cleaner in 01' and RIF'd in 03'.
I got back in 07' as an A/C cleaner again.
Ken MacTiernan, I notice you take pride in your AMT skill and I admire and respect that.
Well bud, I take pride in A/C cleaners skill too.
I machined for over 10 years on the street.
I am a "certified" unlicenced AMT (machinist) who has been on the upgrade (machinist) list for almost 10 years.
I waited 9 of those years just to get the damned credited review board to give me credit !! (only 36 months credit req'd)
Since then I have been waiting while they lower the machinst experience bar to only 18 months exp. req'd.
I am in no way interested in taking a licensed AMT Hangar job.
I just want them to provide the machinist job they said I had a good chance at getting 10 years ago.
Does this Union really want to confront me w/ this idiotic proposal ?
I think it'd be in their best interest to avoid me, my family, my protests, my ideas, my opinions and my ball bat. :angry:
 
I would definitely attend this meeting.
I could not imagine why anyone would want to miss it under these circumstances.
Good ,bad,ugly and bull, I will listen to it and ask all the questions I can.
I can definitely afford to spent a couple of hours , on an issue of such importance.


Might be worth the time assuming the TWU decided to become a democratic union over night.

Of course, since I would have to enter a union hall that was built even after three membership NO VOTES against doing so, I think I will not waste my time there and instead return to my part-time second job for a supplemental paycheck.

I find my second job doesn't pay as well as the AA job, but I tend to be more satisfied when working there than inside the turnstiles of the Tulsa Maintenance Base Stooge Academy.
 
There are a lot of companies out there, it took someone in a/c maintenance to open my eyes. I hope I can do that for someone else. Start looking, this stuff doesn't need to be your problem anymore either.
 
The members should be the ones to accept or turn down.

Negotiators for union mechanics and bag handlers at American Airlines have rejected a contract proposal from American Airlines that called for lump-sum payments instead of wage increases.


The union's top leaders recommended that rank-and-file employees be allowed to vote on the proposal, but the negotiating committee for the Transport Workers union rejected the package.

American, the nation's largest carrier, said the union rejected a comprehensive proposal that included additional vacation and sick leave while recognizing "the economic realities facing the industry and our company."

American's parent, Fort Worth-based AMR Corp., lost $328 million in the first quarter, due largely to record prices for jet fuel.

"In addition, American's labor costs are the highest in the industry," the company said on the Web site. "While we could not address structural increases at this time, the tentative agreement did include improvements in pay and paid time off for TWU-represented employees."

James C. Little, the TWU's international president, said Saturday that he and the international organization recommended that the company's proposal be submitted to members for a vote. Little, however, didn't endorse the package, which fell short of the union's goal of restoring wages and benefits that were lost in 2003 and only covered two years.

"It doesn't meet all our needs, but there is an upside to this," Little said. "The recommendation from international was to let the members decide because of the uncertainty of the industry" and workers' own financial concerns.

Little said the union might next ask for help from federal mediators.

American's proposal called for lump sum payments upon signing of 5 percent of a worker's pay excluding overtime earnings, and 3.5 percent of such pay a year later. The airline also indicated it would explore "variable" pay tied to corporate and local business results.

The company would have added one holiday this year and two next year and increased holiday pay to double-time pay from time-and-a-half. Sick leave would have risen to six days this year and eight next year, from five.

It also would have adopted a new profit-sharing plan. Unlike counterparts at Continental Airlines Inc., American's union employees haven't received profit sharing the past two years because profits were too small to trigger awards.

American is also negotiating over a new contract with pilots -- talks have made little progress so far, according to the union -- and soon with flight attendants. Union employees are working under wage and benefit concessions that were approved in 2003, when the company was close to bankruptcy.

Just for the record, Fleet did vote to let the members decide but trouble with the rest of the Joint committee. Might not be over yet. If the Joint committee comes together and goes forward they should be able to because of separate negotiations. But some things could be a joint offer from the company and that could cause other problems.
 
More on UAW/GM VEBA

-------

Auto Makers Push VEBA Solution for Industry Crisis
— Chris Kutalik


Mike Konopacki. Click for pop-up.A rising chorus of business gurus is singing the praises of a new solution to the U.S. auto industry’s ongoing crisis: one big health care trust for all the Big 3’s workers. According to the proposal’s cheerleaders, by making giant one-time pay-ins the Big 3 auto makers can slice off an estimated $116 billion worth of retiree health obligations from their balance sheets in one swoop and restore profitability.

What’s more, union members will gain too because the money and future administration of retiree health care will be placed in the hands of a massive UAW-administered trust, called a Voluntary Employees Beneficiary Association (VEBA).

A simple win-win for all, right?

“Wrong,†say a growing number of United Auto Workers members. UAW rank and filers, including members of the UAW rank-and-file group Soldiers of Solidarity, have launched a campaign to demand that all plans for such a solution be dropped in current contract negotiations.

In one campaign leaflet these workers say that VEBA really stands for “Vandalize Employee Benefits Again†and that the plan will allow “the company to walk away from retiree health care commitments, and shift all the risk.â€

But what exactly is a VEBA?

On the surface, a VEBA is nothing more than a federally recognized non-profit 501© (9) corporation set up to insure that health care, pension, unemployment, or other benefits are routinely paid out to workers covered by the trust.

According to the non-profit monitoring service Guidestar, there are at least 2,700 VEBAs already in existence for union and non-union employees in industries ranging from steel to utilities to telecommunications. Indeed, several of them already exist (mostly to dole out unemployment money) for Big-3 companies or major auto part suppliers like Visteon, Delphi, Dana, and Johnson Controls.

VEBA RED FLAGS
On closer examination, however, red flags pop up for union members in several critical areas.

For one, many of the trusts start off under-funded. In fact, business analysts claim that this under-funding is one of the key advantages of a Big-3 VEBA solution. They point to the success of Goodyear Tires in dumping $1.3 billion of retiree health care obligations in favor of a $1 billion lump sum payment into a VEBA in the wake of the settlement of its grueling strike with the Steelworkers in late 2006.

Business analyst Mark Oline told Financial Week that General Motors may be only willing or able to offer less than $35 billion of the estimated $50 billion that it owes retired workers. Ford was estimated to only be able to put $13 billion of $17 billion, while Chrysler, with mounting financial pressures from its recent buyout by Cerberus, remained unknown in what it is expected to offer.

UAW members fear that under-funding could lead to a simple, grim arithmetic: each dollar shortchanged will presumably translate into a dollar that can’t be spent on health care premiums, co-pays, deductibles, or quality of care. Under a VEBA, the remaining costs of maintaining health care benefits will have to be shifted back to the workers themselves.

“VEBA shortchanges retirees on benefits they already earned because it is underfunded upfront,†said Gregg Shotwell, a member of UAW Local 2151. “Exchanging dimes for dollars does not make sense. Whatever the company stands to save, retirees stand to lose. Eventually, it will put the union in charge of demanding retirees pay more out of pocket to make up for the short fall.â€

Skyrocketing health care costs or an economic downturn may make an under-funded Big-3 VEBA into even more of a loser for workers. “God help us if we go into a depression or recession,†former UAW President Douglas Fraser commented to The Washington Post, “and the value of the fund plummets and the UAW is sitting there with this huge liability.â€

Moreover, that liability may be more than financial—it may also be political. By taking on the role of health care administrator, the union could be forced into a compromised position, having to potentially limit or cut benefits for the workers it represents.

REAL DANGERS
These pitfalls are not merely hypothetical. They have already occurred with disastrous results for workers inside the UAW.

Following the signing of a concessionary two-tiered contract in January 2005, workers at Caterpillar found themselves with a bankrupt VEBA. According to the Caterpillar VEBA’s 2005 tax filing, the fund paid out $1,350,131 while only having $1,345,186 left in contributions, leaving it owing $4,500.

Retired Caterpillar workers expecting to draw from the fund suffered from the shortfall. They were left to deal with dramatic increases in co-pays, premiums, and deductibles despite previous agreements to protect them.

“I knew I had paid for my lifetime health care coverage through the wage and benefit structure of all the previous contracts I worked under, but this agreement vetoed them all,†retired Caterpillar worker and former UAW Local 751 President Larry Solomon wrote in Labor Notes at the time. “My wife and I will be paying $118/month premiums in 2005, and these will increase each year to a projected $332 by 2010.â€

Fed-up with the inaction of UAW International leadership, members filed a federal class-action lawsuit against Caterpillar in May 2007. According to Shotwell, the case is still pending in the courts and in a final twist “now Caterpillar is suing the UAW because they should have prevented retirees from suing the company.â€

A similar case occurred again at Detroit Diesel. Set up in 1993 to fund retiree benefits, the joint company-and-UAW-administered fund was exhausted by 2004. Saddled with sudden out-of-pocket health care costs, three Detroit Diesel members turned to the courts in desperation, filing a class action suit in January 2007 in defense of the 1,126 affected retirees and surviving family members.

In certain cases, employers can even raid a VEBA’s funds after it has been set up to fund capital expenditures. In 2000, General Motors shifted $1 billion from a VEBA that covered members of the UAW and other unions, according to William Hanline, a member of UAW Local 2195 in Decatur, Alabama. GM spent $500 million of the $1 billion on investments in Suzuki plants and another $500 million to boost the profits of its financing arm, GMAC.

DROPPING VEBA
With these dangers in mind, anti-VEBA UAW members are hoping that they can put up enough resistance to force VEBA plans to be dropped. They plan on distributing flyers and lobbying fellow members at Labor Day parades, union picnics, and other events throughout Michigan.

They also plan on taking the fight beyond just a defensive one around stopping VEBA. Many members are advocating a more far-reaching solution to the auto industry’s health care crisis: a national single-payer health care system for all workers.

“The union is not a financial institution,†said Shotwell. “The union’s purpose is to advance social justice not manage the retreat from corporate accountability.â€

Now there's one thing I would agree with you on. No way do I want TWU entrusted with our medical plan.
 
Back
Top