signals
Veteran
Pedophiles want equal rights, too. Just ask NAMBLA!It is just a matter of time. Perhaps one day everyone will be looked at as equal. This brings us one step closer to that goal.
Pedophiles want equal rights, too. Just ask NAMBLA!It is just a matter of time. Perhaps one day everyone will be looked at as equal. This brings us one step closer to that goal.
Ms Tree said:Same crap was said about womens rights and minority rights. Don't watch if you don't like it. Better yet, just stop supporting bias and allow people to conduct their lives as they see fit and then being gay, transgender, polygamist or what ever will not be a big deal.
Jack Minor, in his column titled "Pedophiles want same rights as homosexuals," wrote:
Using the same tactics used by "gay" rights activists, pedophiles have begun to seek similar status arguing their desire for children is a sexual orientation no different than heterosexual or homosexuals.
Critics of the homosexual lifestyle have long claimed that once it became acceptable to identify homosexuality as simply an "alternative lifestyle" or sexual orientation, logically nothing would be off limits. "Gay" advocates have taken offense at such a position insisting this would never happen. However, psychiatrists are now beginning to advocate redefining pedophilia in the same way homosexuality was redefined several years ago.
In 1973 the American Psychiatric Association declassified homosexuality from its list of mental disorders. A group of psychiatrists with B4U-Act recently held a symposium proposing a new definition of pedophilia in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Health Disorders of the APA.
B4U-Act calls pedophiles "minor-attracted people." The organization's website states its purpose is to, "help mental health professionals learn more about attraction to minors and to consider the effects of stereotyping, stigma and fear."
In 1998 The APA issued a report claiming "that the 'negative potential' of adult sex with children was 'overstated' and that 'the vast majority of both men and women reported no negative sexual effects from childhood sexual abuse experiences."
Nope, no big deal. And the Poly's aren't too far behind.Ms Tree said:Same crap was said about womens rights and minority rights. Don't watch if you don't like it. Better yet, just stop supporting bias and allow people to conduct their lives as they see fit and then being gay, transgender, polygamist or what ever will not be a big deal.
xUT said:Thanks Bro... You know I get a little testy...
Sorry about that... 😛
It's a slow news week. Gotta talk about something...Dog Wonder said:All because a gay guy got drafted by the NFL.
Exactly.eolesen said:Uh, you mean the number of judges who have forced it on states?... How many legalized it via the legislative process?...
The last time you posted that I showed you a liberal foundation funded the poll. I PROVED it to you. Polls are not worth the paper they are written on.AdAstraPerAspera said:
Polls show a majority of Americans support gay marriage now.
That is absolutely correct. Tell that to a libtard though and they will defend it until they are blue in the face.traderjake said:
It's none of my business what people do behind closed doors.
It is my business when it's when it's thrown in my face and the face of young kids watching football.
Careful or some libtard will call you sexist.Ms Tree said:[SIZE=16pt]I think the reason female sports have less of an issue with it is that women are more accepting of it than men. Men are far more homophobic than women are.[/SIZE]
Oh look, the leading thinker of this forum has shown up again.La Li Lu Le Lo said:The last time you posted that I showed you a liberal foundation funded the poll. I PROVED it to you. Polls are not worth the paper they are written on.
Spoken like a true liberal.Ms Tree said:[SIZE=16pt]What you think should or should not be is really irrelevant. [/SIZE]
I am not overly religions (as I have stated many many times) and I do not agree with gay marriage. Your argument is flawed.Ms Tree said:[SIZE=16pt]and now the religious right wants the government to be the protector of what they see as the proper definition of marriage. [/SIZE]
Then you are turning a deaf ear. I have made a post on this very forum referencing just that very idea. I even stated in that post that I would view that as an "acceptable" compromise. Gays wanting to call it marriage is just a component of their agenda to normalize their deviant behavior in the public eye. You hear what you want to hear. You hear what supports your atheist agenda.Ms Tree said:[SIZE=16pt]I have yet to hear of any group arguing to allow all people to have a union and let religions do whatever they want. [/SIZE]
[SIZE=10.5pt]Next you will be telling us a four year old should be able to drive a car because making them wait until they are 16 to get a state issued driver's license is biased. Preposterous.[/SIZE]Ms Tree said:[SIZE=16pt]Government’s issue licenses and they do so in a biased manner. Since government is involved they must (according to the 14[/SIZE]th[SIZE=16pt]) issue licenses without bias. [/SIZE]
Alleged violations of the False Claims Act and the Procurement Integrity ActAdAstraPerAspera said:Oh look, the leading thinker of this forum has shown up again.
Since when is Gallup a liberal foundation?
La Li Lu Le Lo said:The last time you posted that I showed you a liberal foundation funded the poll. I PROVED it to you. Polls are not worth the paper they are written on.