cleardirect
Veteran
- Joined
- May 24, 2008
- Messages
- 6,234
- Reaction score
- 9,749
There's another way to view this pattern you speak of. The CLT reps have made noise, but in the end their final position, or vote record, is more moderate. The MOU was voted 11-0. Some would have them recalled because they don't like to see the way sausages are made. I say the CLT reps have simply been the canary in the coal mine.
If a more pro Hummel group had been the CLT BPR reps these past few weeks, would we have gotten a different and possibly inferior version of this MOU? Aren't you curious to know?
The reps don't negotiate anything. They only direct. Where is the vote showing the CLT directed the NAC to do anything? Where is the record showing that it was only the CLT reps that did that?
In the usapa world majority rules. There are 11 reps, how is it that just the 3 CLT reps were able to improve the MOU all on their own? I find it funny that McKee especially will rant about majority rules. But as soon as he losses and is in the minority he whines about the majority forcing it's agenda. That it is a bad thing when CLT, DCA and JW vote together. But when it is CLT, PHL voting together it is OK. That is a good majoirty but JW voting the other way is a cave.
McKee is all about keeping McKee on FPL. So are the other CLT reps.