Reed Richards
Veteran
- Joined
- Sep 2, 2009
- Messages
- 1,389
- Reaction score
- 1,161
What's American's call sign?
"Pepsi"
What's American's call sign?
Care to wager? Think no one can see through all the USCABA treachery and lies? Every Judge has warned the scabs. Every single one. Did that modify their behavior any? Hell no. See you one again, in court.Doubt it will even make it to the court room. (ref. 9th)
Get lost troll. At least the AA guys won't hear "Hired, not acquired" like the UA guys were so proud of saying. So glad we never merged with the marvins. I'd hate to have to ask for a ride report EVERY time I checked in.
Pursuant to this Memorandum of Understanding Regarding Contingent Collective Bargaining Agreement (this “Memorandum”),
US Airways, Inc. and any successor (collectively, "US Airways"),
American Airlines, Inc. (“American”),
Allied Pilots Association ("APA"), and
US Airline Pilots Association ("USAPA”, and with US Airways, American, and APA, the “Parties”), hereby agree as follows:
Paragraph 4., LAST SENTENCE:
"Once the MTA has been fully implemented, it shall fully displace and render a nullity any prior collective bargaining agreements applicable to US Airways pilots and any status quo arising thereunder."
USAPA and APA are the ONLY TWO PARTIES allowed to "treat" with each other during negotiations and if unsuccessful, before the three arbitrators. AOL IS NOT A PARTY. WEST "CLASS" IS NOT A PARTY. Harper is not a party. The company is a party ONLY WITH the exceptions of 10(B).
"The company(ies) will be parties to the arbitration, if any, in accordance with McCaskill-Bond. The company(ies) shall provide information requested by the merger representatives for use in the arbitration, if any, in accordance with requirements of McCaskill-Bond, provided that the information is relevant to the issues involved in the arbitration, and the requests are reasonable and do not impose undue burden or expense, and so long as the merger representatives agree to appropriate confidentiality terms."
d. During the McCaskill-Bond process, including any arbitration proceeding, US Airways, American or New American Airlines, or their successors (if any), shall remain neutral regarding the order in which pilots are placed on the integrated seniority list, but such neutrality shall not prevent said carriers from insuring that the award complies with the criteria in Paragraph 10(B)(i)-(v).
So companies provide data to USAPA & APA and they construct lists each party thinks it should be. If they don't agree, then EVERYTHING STARTS OVER IN ARBITRATION.
OK now that is funny right there.
It has been east reps that for the last 5 years have played games, created drama, threatened, caused an illegal job action and embarrassed themselves with long winded BS updates and attacked anyone not "on board" even east pilots.
No it was Crimi that stormed out like a little kid from the BPR meeting because he did not like what he was hearing.
For the childish behavior look no further than your own reps. The west reps have done a fine, professional job. They will continue to do so and probably have to apologize a few times for east behavior.
It is going to be fun to watch the change in tone from the APA. More professional, less emotional.
Money walks and bull#### talks.
LCC http://finance.yahoo... Key Statistics
UAL http://finance.yahoo... Key Statistics
Looking forward to putting you ALPA pukes out of BUSINESS.
Awe shucks! Did I hit a nerve, Pi?
Still sore about the anti-acquisition bag stickers? Or was it the pre-nup that got under your skin?
Can't wait to see how your DOH pipe dream unfolds now that you will be part of a REAL airline. Let me guess... you "ONLY" have eyes on a 767 captain position in JFK, or MIA, right?? Good luck with that.
I'll agree with you on one point. I count my blessings that we never merged with your toxic, dysfunctional, regional airline carcass.
My TWA buddies are bracing themselves for what's in store. They are well aware of your history and reputation. Welcome to the minority and enjoy the ride. You control exactly nothing from this point forward.
THANK GOD! The most dangerous sh!tbag airline is going to the crematory. And the most destructive pilot group is being neutered in six months. Things are looking up in this industry. Peace to all!
You can hope and wish all day long for a negotiated list. How did that work out for you last time? When you DEMAND unreasonable things no one is going to agree. The east refused to move off of DOH/LOS. The west would not agree the aPA is not going to agree to DOH.I don't think it is going to be all that "bumpy" of a ride. At least we won't have to be riding it out in the cheap seats. I also think that a negotiated SLI is preferable and achievable.
As I have said since my very first posts on this forum, there is no reason why pilots can not come to a mutually agreed upon and ratifiable SLI amongst themselves. It might not be a pretty or pleasant process, much like making sausage and caesarian birth, but in the end the results are worth the effort.
Why do you suppose the "agreed upon" process going forward is in effect? Could it be what resulted from the TWA and the NIC travesties? Why do you suppose that even ALPO changed their merger criteria to include LOS as a major factor and if necessary a THREE arbitrator panel in their latest "new" policy?
As far as specifically what the SLI will turn out to be, stay tuned. I will consider this merger a win for all the pilots involved, if the SLI is achieved through negotiations conducted by and for the pilots. If that turns out to be the case, I will be 100% supportive of the outcome. If it goes to arbitration, then it will be what it will be and we will all just have to live with it, like it or not. Hence my personal preference that it be a negotiated agreement. Will everybody like ANY SLI? Certainly not, but at least it will be what the pilots agree to, not what a bunch of lawyers decide to shove up our collective butts!
seajay
The NIC is only a "travesty" because it is your opinion. There was no lawyer that decided to "shove" anything. The AAA Merger committee argued how DOH was the ONLY list they would be a party to. They didn't have a "plan B". Had they been more reasonable and argued something different, you may have seen a list that was more palatable. Further, the AAA MEC communicated that DOH was a lock. The parties agreed in advance to comply with the award. There are no do-overs or crossing fingers.
Have you seen what kind of a list is generated in a mutually negotiated SLI in the recent past? Personally, I would prefer to have the case heard from an impartial party. We'll see what is proffered.
CB
Yeah, quite a turnaround for your career, aye? At least the guys at AA and US knew what it was like to be chosen to work for a real airline. Hell, you were hired at America West and now look at you. Trust me the SkyNAAzis know all about your Westies and thank god for you they no longer use a stapler for their lists because you guys would be at the end of pile. So stop bitching you got lucky. Now get ready to put your houses on the market because PHX is about to get downsized.
Later,
Eye
If it goes to arbitration, then it will be what it will be and we will all just have to live with it, like it or not.
seajay
And I bet the Nicolau is in there as a starting point. The company is not going to risk litigation from a DFR that had proven merit. No LUP assures that we're hosed.