Walmartgreeter
Veteran
- Joined
- Mar 6, 2003
- Messages
- 1,430
- Reaction score
- 1,143
MB arbitration would certainly put a nail in it but I think the APA and USAPA must recognize an important difference between submitting to an an arbitrator versus coming to a cooperative agreement. On the one hand arbitrators act like judges and try to settle scores but on the other hand the company isn't here to play judge and jury and won't see any need to settle old disputes and perceived injustices amongst various union members. An arbitrator has to come up with a scheme to make everyone equal considering the past and the future (think pensions, growth, pay rates, retirements, whatever..all the unfairness can be "fixed" by the arbitrator) whereas the company are businessmen interested in everyone letting bygones be bygones so we all move forward profitably.
IMHO the risk of going to arbitration for anything is a lose, lose proposition for APA and USAPA. I know, I know, have pilots ever been cooperative in a merger...
Yep. Lose, lose for APA and USAPA going to arbitration. USAPA should fear (as did AirTran) an income based argument in front of an arbitrator. APA can get everything it wants, even with straight DOH and big fences and restrictions. Long enough for us all to go away. No sense in risking even a chance of a NIC type award skewed in one direction. APA has paid attention to the missteps of all those that came before them in post 911 BK's. I am sure they have this all figured out. That is unless they are actually in Dallas discussing the NIC. You think?!Greeter