District 142 Update

From The Hub:

US Airways announced today that the International Association of Machinists and Aerospace Workers (IAM) has agreed to put out for separate ratification votes revised company proposals on new labor agreements for the mechanic and related, fleet service, and maintenance training specialist workgroups. The IAM has agreed to complete the ratification votes by Friday, Jan. 21, 2005.
Earlier today, Judge Stephen S. Mitchell of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the eastern district of Virginia ruled in favor of the company’s request to reject the IAM’s current collective bargaining agreements and to permit termination of the company’s three mainline defined benefit plans.
US Airways will delay implementation of the court ruling as applied to the IAM collective bargaining agreements until after the ratification process has been completed, in the hope that all proposals will be ratified. The company will, however, proceed with respect to the court’s granted relief that involves termination of the three mainline defined benefit pension plans, and will start working with the Pension Benefit Guarantee Corp. to begin the orderly transfer of the plans.

The company had pending before the court a motion for permanent relief from the existing labor agreements with the IAM, as well as for relief with respect to retiree medical benefits and termination of the mainline defined benefit plans. All other US Airways workgroups – the Air Line Pilots Association (ALPA), the Association of Flight Attendants (AFA), the Communications Workers of America (CWA), and three units of the Transport Workers Union (TWU) – had ratified new labor agreements and were no longer included in the company’s request. In addition, the company reached settlements with current retirees and the IAM concerning the relief it had sought for retiree medical benefits.

The company said that it was hopeful of ratification of all three IAM proposals. “We have worked very hard to craft alternative proposals that still meet the company’s cost savings targets, but preserve jobs and pay as much as possible,â€￾ said Jerry Glass, senior vice president - employee relations. “Regrettably, we cannot save every job and every function, and these employees, like all other workgroups, must share in the changes that the company needs to make. But we are quite hopeful that our employees will see these proposals as viable alternatives, and they will quickly be ratified.â€￾

Glass said that the IAM will be providing its members a detailed analysis of the proposals, but among the key provisions:

Mechanics & Related workgroup:

Pay rates for mechanics would be significantly better than the current pay that reflects a 21 percent temporary cut

Heavy maintenance on Airbus narrowbody aircraft will be brought in-house and certain Boeing 737 work will continue to be done in-house. Widebody heavy maintenance and other work to be specified, including some Boeing 737 inspection activity, will be done using outside maintenance vendors

Base maintenance will continue to be performed in Charlotte, N.C., and Pittsburgh

Line maintenance positions will increase with anticipated schedule changes in 2005

Utility classification and certain utility positions will be preserved at base

maintenance facilities only, with other utility and cleaning services to be outsourced

IAM employees displaced by outsourcing will be offered existing and future fleet service positions

Fleet Service workgroup:

Pay rates for fleet service employees at hubs and major stations would be significantly better than the current pay that reflects a 21 percent temporary pay reduction

Most existing fleet service work will be preserved

A majority of scope provisions will remain unchanged except the right to outsource fleet work at the smaller cities and a second-tier pay scale for medium-sized cities

Continuation in the pre-existing IAM multi-employer national pension plan at unreduced levels

Overall, these three workgroups include approximately 8,500 employees. If the agreements are ratified and implemented, the company said that the majority of IAM jobs will be preserved.

“We need the support and participation of our employees to complete our transformation into a competitive airline,â€￾ said Glass. “The announcements by other airlines this week further underscore the rapid changes that are taking place. I believe our employees understand the gravity of the situation, and will support these proposals as the best way to send a message to our customers and the financial community that we are united in our efforts to be successful.â€￾
 
The dummies in CCY could not turn a profit. We throw away thousands like it is toilet paper. I could eliminate over $200,000 with one phone call but it seems no one in CCY cares to listen. Even an open letter to Mr Lakefield went unanswered. OVER TWO HUNDRED THOUSAND A YEAR, last time I checked that was alot of money to a BK Company, but not to our Company.
 
700UW said:
Spindoc
The IAM gave the company a full comprehensive offer yesterday morning that covered the full ask and more.

The company rejected the offer, it takes two sides to make an agreement and the company never truly wanted to reach a TA.
[post="236378"][/post]​

If the IAM gave the company full ask and more then the agreement would have been announced or is it one of those kind of deals where you offer to cut down on OJI's in exchange for a fully functional gym in numerous stations where the costs associated with such would've been enormous? Something smells fishy with the so called full ask that is spoken of.
 
DCAflyer said:
From The Hub:

Utility classification and certain utility positions will be preserved at base

maintenance facilities only, with other utility and cleaning services to be outsourced

IAM employees displaced by outsourcing will be offered existing and future fleet service positions

[post="236402"][/post]​

Sounds like this provision is the reason why some of the negotiators don't like the proposal.
 
You will see when everything is brought out to the light of day. You still in the charlotte area?
 
700UW said:
You will see when everything is brought out to the light of day. You still in the charlotte area?
[post="236433"][/post]​
700, Glass states that utility kept in base mtc, 320 heavy brought back in house, pit, clt heavy mtc kept . Sounds far fetched to me ??????
 
Baja4U said:
700, Glass states that utility kept in base mtc, 320 heavy brought back in house, pit, clt heavy mtc kept . Sounds far fetched to me ??????
[post="236442"][/post]​


I did not see any mention of the heavy work on the B757's or 767's...I also did not see any mention on the wages for anyone other than the mechanics getting better than the 21% take we are already giving. What exactly does this mean for the Related Classifications?
 
700UW said:
Because no group was asked to give up as much.

Did the ask ALPA, AFA, CWA or TWU to give up 50% of the jobs?

Nope.

And you go ask any union rep or member from one of those unions above if they would have reached and ratified a TA if they were going to lose 50% of their members?
[post="236382"][/post]​


Actually, Since 2001, there are about 1800 fewer pilots now down to about 3,000 from 6,000 over the past 4 years. So all groups have given up jobs. Remember the Company used to employ about 55,000, now down to 28,000 and shrinking more everyday.

Any way, it really wont matter in the long run... everyone will be looking for a new job.

And as they say, if the offer isn't good for you, go somewhere else. As for us, a job interview on Monday in a non-avaition industry.....Hope for the best, plan for the worst.

KB
 
700UW said:
Wrong,

US Airways is asking everyone to work for lower then market rates.

Go check the pay scales and you will see that.
[post="236400"][/post]​
PAYRATES? Its not about pay rates mr i know everything.
 
usfliboi said:
PAYRATES? Its not about pay rates mr i know everything.
[post="236495"][/post]​
Flyboi,
Leave 700 alone. It doesn't matter anyway. At least you have a skill. Maybe you can get a job serving Cokes at Copal's Grill! :rolleyes:
 
av8orwife: "Actually, Since 2001, there are about 1800 fewer pilots now down to about 3,000 from 6,000 over the past 4 years"

Yes I believe you and agree with the general spirit of your post, but the number of times a workgroup is halved is the rub. There were just over 6000 mechanics in 2001, down to around 3400 and change now....about to be halved yet again.
 
av8orwife said:
Actually, Since 2001, there are about 1800 fewer pilots now down to about 3,000 from 6,000 over the past 4 years. So all groups have given up jobs. Remember the Company used to employ about 55,000, now down to 28,000 and shrinking more everyday.

Any way, it really wont matter in the long run... everyone will be looking for a new job.

And as they say, if the offer isn't good for you, go somewhere else. As for us, a job interview on Monday in a non-avaition industry.....Hope for the best, plan for the worst.

KB
[post="236484"][/post]​
Already had a GOOD interview this week , non-airline too !!! CHEERS!!! ;)
 
jack mama said:
700,
when can we expect more information. the details out now sure a interesting...i'm sure there's an explanation.....
[post="236518"][/post]​
Can't wait to see the NEW proposal!!!!!! HAHA :lol: