Lol, says the guy that keeps saying, yea, what that guy said. It doesn’t take a rocket scientist to recognize extreme garbage articles.Says the king of the no substance comebacks.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Lol, says the guy that keeps saying, yea, what that guy said. It doesn’t take a rocket scientist to recognize extreme garbage articles.Says the king of the no substance comebacks.
You're so lost it's sad.Lol, says the guy that keeps saying, yea, what that guy said. It doesn’t take a rocket scientist to recognize extreme garbage articles.
Lol, keep me laughing.You're so lost it's sad.
NYPost/Murdoch.......LOLIt doesn’t take a rocket scientist to recognize extreme garbage articles.
The article you posted with no source was ny post, thanks for playing.NYPost/Murdoch.......LOL
You conveniently overlooked the one from The Hill......LOL
You know, the same The Hill that's 'center biased'.
Oh dear.....Two for two.
Oh dear, you missed the other four................The article you posted with no source was ny post, thanks for playing.
Lol, you didn’t source, how convenient. You do admit ny post article, thanks for proving your extreme bias in following Murdoch.Oh dear, you missed the other four................
Doesn't matter if Ronald McDonald published it.......a dreaded RW news source, ( you had no trouble figuring out who it was), was correct in its reporting.Lol, you didn’t source, how convenient. You do admit ny post article, thanks for proving your extreme bias in following Murdoch.
Lol, ny post was proven?Doesn't matter if Ronald McDonald published it.......a dreaded RW news source, ( you had no trouble figuring out who it was), was correct in its reporting.
You're the one challenging the source.Lol, ny post was proven?
don't expect anything to get proven.You're the one challenging the source.
With that said, you are admitting the other four are correct, as you haven't attacked them or their information.
Prove it wrong, then.
What other 4? I didn’t see a source, just writing. I’ll write some stuff too, would that be the game you’re playing?You're the one challenging the source.
With that said, you are admitting the other four are correct, as you haven't attacked them or their information.
Prove it wrong, then.
What that guy said again, you don’t change.don't expect anything to get proven.
LOL.....so it didn't take you long to figure out one was NYPost.....LOLWhat other 4? I didn’t see a source, just writing. I’ll write some stuff too, would that be the game you’re playing?
Without you sourcing I got lucky, didn’t bother with the rest after seeing another crap source.LOL.....so it didn't take you long to figure out one was NYPost.....LOL