NYPost/Murdoch.......LOLIt doesn’t take a rocket scientist to recognize extreme garbage articles.
You conveniently overlooked the one from The Hill......LOL
You know, the same The Hill that's 'center biased'.
Oh dear.....Two for two.
NYPost/Murdoch.......LOLIt doesn’t take a rocket scientist to recognize extreme garbage articles.
The article you posted with no source was ny post, thanks for playing.NYPost/Murdoch.......LOL
You conveniently overlooked the one from The Hill......LOL
You know, the same The Hill that's 'center biased'.
Oh dear.....Two for two.
Oh dear, you missed the other four................The article you posted with no source was ny post, thanks for playing.
Lol, you didn’t source, how convenient. You do admit ny post article, thanks for proving your extreme bias in following Murdoch.Oh dear, you missed the other four................![]()
![]()
Doesn't matter if Ronald McDonald published it.......a dreaded RW news source, ( you had no trouble figuring out who it was), was correct in its reporting.Lol, you didn’t source, how convenient. You do admit ny post article, thanks for proving your extreme bias in following Murdoch.
Doesn't matter if Ronald McDonald published it.......a dreaded RW news source, ( you had no trouble figuring out who it was), was correct in its reporting.
You're the one challenging the source.Lol, ny post was proven?
don't expect anything to get proven.You're the one challenging the source.
With that said, you are admitting the other four are correct, as you haven't attacked them or their information.
Prove it wrong, then.
What other 4? I didn’t see a source, just writing. I’ll write some stuff too, would that be the game you’re playing?You're the one challenging the source.
With that said, you are admitting the other four are correct, as you haven't attacked them or their information.
Prove it wrong, then.
What that guy said again, you don’t change.don't expect anything to get proven.
LOL.....so it didn't take you long to figure out one was NYPost.....LOLWhat other 4? I didn’t see a source, just writing. I’ll write some stuff too, would that be the game you’re playing?
Without you sourcing I got lucky, didn’t bother with the rest after seeing another crap source.LOL.....so it didn't take you long to figure out one was NYPost.....LOL
Funny, I posted it at 8:56am, no one posted until 9:11am.......you....and your immediate response was "Lol, nice try, NY Post, Murdoch".Without you sourcing I got lucky, didn’t bother with the rest after seeing another crap source.
Lol, what am I proving? When I saw ny post, that was it for me. Stopped reading. Fill me in.Funny, I posted it at 8:56am, no one posted until 9:11am.......you....and your immediate response was "Lol, nice try, NY Post, Murdoch".
Took you all of 15 minutes to figure it out.....'Lucky'
Don't worry, don't feel you have to try and explain yourself.
You still haven't disproved the NYPost article.....Thanks for playing.
He's his own worst enemy.........................another Justin.don't expect anything to get proven.
Lol, what am I proving? When I saw ny post, that was it for me. Stopped reading. Fill me in.