[blockquote]
----------------
On 12/20/2002 11
54 PM PineyBob wrote:
Bravo Diogenes! Bravo.
Very well said. We shall soon see what Mr. Siegel is really made of! I think he is up to the task at hand! My question is will he he be able to rally the management side in Fort Fumble to implement his plans. I have heard rumors that the Agh, PSA, Pdmt rivalries still exist and it is one of the things that constatnly drags down management. Any truth to those rumors?
----------------
[/blockquote]
-----------------------------------------------------------
PineyBob,
First, thank you for the kind words.
The PSA/AL/PI rivalry was deadly, and had consequences lasting unto this day. After merger, instead of rationalizing the operation, US kept a PIT/PHL centric attitude. It was, and is, foolish to have major hubs located so closely together. It has only now been partially addressed. Additionally, one of the contenders for the Colodny throne was a former AA veep who despised PI. It was open season on former PI employees, and the PI way. As one who loved PI, I nevertheless accepted the merger and worked my a$$ off to make US work, but I must say the antipathy from the Palace was palpable and unprofessional.
Now amongst the grunts, the rivalries have pretty much receeded to the level of "who's the best college basketball team". As there has been no steady hand on the tiller, we've been too busy steering the good ship US from deck level by sail management and weight placement - inefficient, but the only tool we have to hand.
But the effects are still with us. For example, why do we still have offices in PIT, INT and CCY - only some progress has been made on this front. This question goes back to the Schofield days, who promised "we'll get around to that." Under BK, abrogate and move to a cheap operating location, or renegotiate CCY to a reasonable rate.
As to the best college basketball team - University of National Champions - UNC