What's new

Iraq,no ties to 9-11?

So how are you this morning....

By credible link I am refering to what you and Garfield are willing to accept as actual factual liberal approoved news and or information sources...You know,like Fox news :lol:

About the Bushie thing and Iraq/9-11 Terrorism links...I never told any lib's this but I figured it out a couple years ago that 9-11 and Hussien had little,if any connection.I'm sure theres some indirect remote ties through funds,etc.Hell Saddam was tight with Syria and helped Hezzbollah through the "exploding Palestinian children program"....you know,put your child on the line for Allah and get Instant Cash-$25,000.

I still insist there are WMD's out in the Bekka Valley and in Syria.You fail to accept the FACTS that yes indeed some things were found.....you do know what they do with yellowcake now don't you?(oops wasn't a W80 warhead).

There wasn't very much good in Iraq under Hussien...and like a good neighbor,it was right to go in and stop the regime....it curtailed the exploding child program with cash incentives overnite.That was quite out of hand and a terrible perversion of a religion.That alone,to me justified military action.

As far as this:
Insurgents work in and around the Sunni triangle trying to start civil war with the Shiites....Sure there are other areas of action but its not every street corner like you imply.In fact as time goes on the areas and insurgents are getting smaller day by day.You actually think its bad around every corner and under every rock?Well if you do you're quite wrong.Ex-mil's have told me time and time again what we see on TV doesn't depict what is going on over there.....I figure they were there,they ought to know better than Anderson Cooper.

As to reliable,credible sources...check this out:

[/b][/i]

Heres a link

I really do not watch Fox News as its a premium channel and i'm too cheap 😉

Have a nice weekend dude......
Outstanding post! AS you said, the weapons WERE there. This is an undenyable fact. Some of my old contacts have speculated that most went over the borders to either Syria or Iran, most likely starting as soon as President Bush made clear he was not going to tolerate any more UN sanctions violations.
I also have spoken with many returning vets, and almost to a man they agree that the situation is NOTHING like big media is reporting it. The fact that so little attention is paid to the rank and file service man is a constant source of anger to me. The question of 'WHY ARENT THESE STORIES BEING TOLD?" is a question no lib has a decent answer to.
I DO watch FOX news..as well as CNN, MSNBC, read the wall Street Journal and New York times, and listen to NPR as well as conservative talk radio. Only a fool or brainwashed idealog relys soley on one side for objective information.
 
Thank you....and thanks for seeing it the way it is.

Watch your six..these boards are frequented by liberals :lol:
 
By credible link I am refering to what you and Garfield are willing to accept as actual factual liberal approoved news and or information sources...You know,like Fox news :lol:

Like I said...you are trying to change the subject. This whole thread is about Iraq and its supposed "ties" (i.e. "LINK"...don't you get it?) to 9/11. I said that there was no credible link. Again...not meaning internet link for crying out loud...link as in "tie" per the entire premise of the thread.

Now...if we want to talk website links that have nothing to do with this thread, we should do it in another one. I can tell you that a little hint is to look at what is being advertised on the website. If it is nothing but Ann Coulter books, Rush Limbaugh, and "crazy liberal something something", it is definitely slanted and with an agenda. Same as any website that has Al Gore, Farenheit 9/11, and "crazy conservative something something" is definitely slanted and with an agenda. But again..we aren't talking those "links", are we? We are talking about LINKS between Iraq and 9/11 and how there aren't any of these LINKS b/c Bushie would have pointed out such LINKS if they existed (remember "link" does not equal "website" in this thread so no need to swift boat it and try to divert from the topic at hand.)

About the Bushie thing and Iraq/9-11 Terrorism links...I never told any lib's this but I figured it out a couple years ago that 9-11 and Hussien had little,if any connection.

So you're saying that starting a thread stating that Iraq had LINKS to 9/11 while you don't believe there is a connection is probably just a form of wind-up for you? Nice.

I still insist there are WMD's out in the Bekka Valley and in Syria.You fail to accept the FACTS that yes indeed some things were found.....you do know what they do with yellowcake now don't you?(oops wasn't a W80 warhead).

I've already explained that Bushie would have run with any of this. Yes chemicals were found...remember the ones we fed to Iraq during their battle with Iran? We have even admitted that there were no new ones found...that is why Bushie hasn't run with it. Oh yeah...and your redefining warheads and fighter jets (typical military units allowed in Iraq...these are not WMDs!!!!) as WMDs doesn't seem to agree with Bushie who hasn't stooped as low as to try to call conventional weapons WMDs just to back up his case. Seems you are alone on that one.

There wasn't very much good in Iraq under Hussien...and like a good neighbor,it was right to go in and stop the regime.

I agree that Hussein was a tyranical ruler. But that is not why we went in. It was for WMDs, remember? Of course you don't b/c you keep inventing new reasons like 9/11 or to remove a dictator from power. And if we are in the business of saving nations from their rulers, shouldn't we have started in Sudan, worked our way to N. Korea, made a stop in Iran, said "hello" to China, and vacationed in Cuba first? Seems that Iraq and Hussein were not nearly as tyranical as these other (and many more) nations. Why pick on them?
 
Like I said...you are trying to change the subject. This whole thread is about Iraq and its supposed "ties" (i.e. "LINK"...don't you get it?) to 9/11. I said that there was no credible link. Again...not meaning internet link for crying out loud...link as in "tie" per the entire premise of the thread.

You've been asked time and time again in several threads now as to what in your mind is a credible link/news source/what ever you acknowledge as truth.So quit dodging the question.

Now...if we want to talk website links that have nothing to do with this thread, we should do it in another one.

Done it in several now dude

I can tell you that a little hint is to look at what is being advertised on the website. If it is nothing but Ann Coulter books, Rush Limbaugh, and "crazy liberal something something", it is definitely slanted and with an agenda. Same as any website that has Al Gore, Farenheit 9/11, and "crazy conservative something something" is definitely slanted and with an agenda. But again..we aren't talking those "links", are we? We are talking about LINKS between Iraq and 9/11 and how there aren't any of these LINKS b/c Bushie would have pointed out such LINKS if they existed (remember "link" does not equal "website" in this thread so no need to swift boat it and try to divert from the topic at hand.)
So you're saying that starting a thread stating that Iraq had LINKS to 9/11 while you don't believe there is a connection is probably just a form of wind-up for you? Nice.

Hook line and sinker for you dude....My post does in fact state that there was one albeit as I indicated....loose.You no comprende senor'? :lol:
of course from a non liberal approved news source :lol:

I've already explained that Bushie would have run with any of this.

Bush doesn't play that game like the dems do-guess you never will realize that. stick with atmospherics dude,its your forte'

Yes chemicals were found...remember the ones we fed to Iraq during their battle with Iran? We have even admitted that there were no new ones found...that is why Bushie hasn't run with it. Oh yeah...and your redefining warheads and fighter jets (typical military units allowed in Iraq...these are not WMDs!!!!) as WMDs doesn't seem to agree with Bushie who hasn't stooped as low as to try to call conventional weapons WMDs just to back up his case. Seems you are alone on that one.

check out the definition Mr.Science :lol:

I agree that Hussein was a tyranical ruler. But that is not why we went in. It was for WMDs, remember? Of course you don't b/c you keep inventing new reasons like 9/11 or to remove a dictator from power. And if we are in the business of saving nations from their rulers, shouldn't we have started in Sudan, worked our way to N. Korea, made a stop in Iran, said "hello" to China, and vacationed in Cuba first? Seems that Iraq and Hussein were not nearly as tyranical as these other (and many more) nations. Why pick on them?

Conservatives-saving the world,one nation at a time 🙄

My goodness...will you quit your crying?
 
Truther (TROO-ther) n. Someone, usually a liberal, who clings desperately to a fading hope that maybe, just maybe, President Bush might have known somebody who knew someone else who went to school with someone who once hired one of the 9/11 terrorists to work at his Tastee-Freeze. So, yes, it was Bush's fault.
 
Yep, Its all a right wing conspiracy designed to usher in the Anti-christ along with Global warming! :lol:
 

Latest posts

Back
Top