What's new

Is the IAM a company union?

gonzo

Veteran
Joined
Oct 17, 2005
Messages
902
Reaction score
0
What is a Company Union?


In the late 1980s the Machinists Union financed the publication of a self-promoting history of itself titled THE FIGHTING MACHINISTS. The book was authored by Robert G. Rodden, a long-time member of the IAM’s privileged headquarters staff. Mr. Rodden’s work, despite the expected bias in favor of his employer, is nonetheless a well written and comprehensive source of information generally unavailable elsewhere.

Fortunately, THE FIGHTING MACHINISTS was written before the IAM had completed it’s shameful slide into the depths of company unionism. In fact, Mr. Rodden offers an excellent definition of a company union on page 80 of his treatise. He states:

Some of these company unions offered a wide variety of employee benefits such as profit-sharing and bonuses, company insurance and pensions, company magazines and many other sweeteners intended to make workers feel they were all part of "one big family"—service pins, veterans clubs, athletic teams, payroll propaganda slips, and even brass bands and country clubs. Company unions seemed to give employees a kind of pretend unionism, but actually tightened management’s grip on the work force. Their object was to keep workers out of genuine unions. To a large extent they were successful.

Now, where is that brass band.....

🙂
 
all out last ditch campaign to discredit for more votes?? :lol:
getting more desperate everyday...

gee gonzo...haven't seen you around for some time.....
funny you come back with twelve days left... :lol:
Fred Said 😉
 
I'm glad you missed me dell. I am on here when time permits. Some time it's a lot, some time it's not. 🙂
 
all out last ditch campaign to discredit for more votes?? :lol:

No, this has been festering for a long, long time. No last ditch campaign. It's just that there is FINALLY going to be some closure.........one way or another.

Do ya think Vegas would take a wager???
 
JUST AT TECH IF YOU DO NOT WANT TO POST E-MAIL one on one
www.awa-usair-tech@hot mail.com :up: its all good.
bet DELL MR-700 WILL NOT DO THAT.

O BY THE WAY MY ISP LIST ALL WHO SEND BAD LITTLE THINGS AND I SEND BACK WITH A TWIST :lol: :up: :mf_boff:LOL
 
JUST AT TECH IF YOU DO NOT WANT TO POST E-MAIL one on one
www.awa-usair-tech@hot mail.com :up: its all good.
bet DELL MR-700 WILL NOT DO THAT.

O BY THE WAY MY ISP LIST ALL WHO SEND BAD LITTLE THINGS AND I SEND BACK WITH A TWIST :lol: :up: :mf_boff:LOL
'smatter? p/m's no good anymore?
are you f*cked up this eve 'er what? 😱
 
make mine IBT
September 30, 2003
Bad, bad boys
Today's WSJ has an interesting editorial (link expiring October 7th) shining a light on the often ignored subject of union violence and intimidation.

Union violence gets little media coverage. So we'd like to share a new posting on the International Brotherhood of Teamsters' Web site about a settlement it recently reached with the National Labor Relations Board.

The case stems from a nasty -- and ultimately unsuccessful -- strike against Overnite Transportation Co., of Richmond, Va. The strike was marred by intimidation that the company says includes more than 50 shootings at its trucks or drivers since 1999. What follows are excerpts from a notice the Teamsters are required to post at their locals:

"WE WILL NOT use or threaten to use a weapon of any kind, including but not limited to guns, knives, slingshots, rocks, ball bearings, liquid-filled balloons or other projectiles, picket signs, sticks, sledge hammers, bricks, hot coffee, bottles, two by fours, lit cigarettes, eggs, or bags or balloons filled with excrement against any non-striking Overnite employee or security guard in the presence of any Overnite employee...

:shock:
 
ALL unions as a result of what they have evolved into are in a way "Company unions". When you have a hierarchy like IAM and IBT and the rest of the AFL-CIO unions do, you to a certain extent become company unions due to the economic realities of financially supporting the bloated infrastructure of unions like the IAM.

It would certainly be unfair to single out IAM to any greater extent than IBT. Both are IMO dues grubbing organizations with little regard for the rank & file.
I agree
 
me too....in this day and age unions have some questionable tenets.....
sure,they do purport to have the memberships best interests in mind but on the other hand they too are a business and they too also have vested interest in the company they contract to's survivability.
much like the little pilot fish who cleans the sharks teeth? 😉
 
me too....in this day and age unions have some questionable tenets..... 😉

Very true! It's a business. The union is only as strong as it's membership. If the membership doesn't get involved then the union administration does what it thinks is best. EVERYONE GET INVOLVED IN YOUR UNION. 🙂
 

Latest posts

Back
Top