MCI transplant
Veteran
- Joined
- Jun 4, 2003
- Messages
- 5,311
- Reaction score
- 584
<_< Haven't heard a word in a long time on the progress of a.a.'s new Tags-mahall? Anyony one know what's going on?
MCI transplant said:<_< Haven't heard a word in a long time on the progress of a.a.'s new Tags-mahall? Anyony one know what's going on?
[post="229754"][/post]
Bob Owens said:Yes, they are still burning cash there every day. Part of it is supposed to open up in the spring.
[post="229778"][/post]
MCI transplant said:<_< Haven't heard a word in a long time on the progress of a.a.'s new Tags-mahall? Anyony one know what's going on?
[post="229754"][/post]
<_< Hello Bear! The spelling thing is getting old! People with small minds love to point out spelling errors when they have no other way of contributing an inteligent counter point! So---- every so often, I'll throw them a bone to see who will bite on it! The Cheifs? The potental is there! That's what makes it so frustrating! Oh well, It's getting late! Merry Christmas Bear! Hope you and yours have a Happy New Year!!!!! 😉NewHampshire Black Bears said:++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
MCI,
I'll definitely cut you some slack, on the spelling of the "Taj Mahal"
Was your question a " Freudian slip" , in otherwords bumping(25%) JFK, after AA hacks MCI/AMT to death ??
How's the KC Chiefs doing ??
Better still, How's the NE pats doing ??
MCI, I'm really only bustin' on ya today.
I really think if PIT winds up with home field advantage,that they WILL beat Brady, and CO. But not win the SB. I think PHL would beat PIT
All right, I'll leave you alone for the rest of the day 😛 😛 😛
Regards,
NH/BB's
(Retired)(In your wildest dreams you can't know how *ucking good it is to be watching all this ####, from the sidelines) !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
[post="229817"][/post]
desertfox said:Cute and cynical answer..but inaccurate. <_<
Here is the background on where the cash is coming from on the JFK terminal.
http://newyorkbiz.com/nycida/idanewsrel4.02.html
[post="229812"][/post]
Bob Owens said:Ok, looked at the link, it was about a cargo terminal, not the AA term.
Guess you didnt bother to read the whole article......here is a clipout regarding the passenger terminals.
More recently at JFK, the IDA has approved tax-exempt bond financing for Continental Airlines’ $30 million air cargo facility, American Airlines’ $1.3 billion overhaul and replacement of its passenger terminals, and the $100 million second phase renovation of British Airways’ passenger terminal.
Former ModerAAtor said:This all started in 1999, DFWCC, long before there was any thought of TWA routes and a year before Jetblue even took to the skies. Having worked at JFK in the early 90's, this is long overdue.
AA spent millions renovating the terminal in the 90s. It was not pretty but it still moved plenty of people through there. My house was built 25 years before the old terminal, you wont see me tearing it down to put up a new one just for the hell of it.
Yes, the lease payments go up, but that is partly offset with other savings.
Yes, from us. Namely the $120,000 paycut we took till 2008.
The current terminal we've been using isn't exactly cheap to maintain, nor is it what I'd call energy efficient.
It will be nice to be able to pull cable without having to worry about asbestos in the walls, or bringing up the wiring/plumbing to current building codes every time you need to knock out a wall for expansion...
Then you have the current three check-in areas and corresponding bagrooms. That gets consolidated into a single check-in area and one bagroom when all is done, which means a lot less confusion for customers, and fewer staff.
Another plus is that the new terminal gives us a lot more widebody gates with which to go after ground handling contracts for other carriers.
How many more gates will we finally end up with? What do you consider to be "a lot"?
And as far as the contracts what does that mean for mechanics?[post="230686"][/post]
Former ModerAAtor said:This all started in 1999, DFWCC, long before there was any thought of TWA routes and a year before Jetblue even took to the skies. Having worked at JFK in the early 90's, this is long overdue.
Yes, the lease payments go up, but that is partly offset with other savings.
The current terminal we've been using isn't exactly cheap to maintain, nor is it what I'd call energy efficient.
It will be nice to be able to pull cable without having to worry about asbestos in the walls, or bringing up the wiring/plumbing to current building codes every time you need to knock out a wall for expansion...
Then you have the current three check-in areas and corresponding bagrooms. That gets consolidated into a single check-in area and one bagroom when all is done, which means a lot less confusion for customers, and fewer staff.
Another plus is that the new terminal gives us a lot more widebody gates with which to go after ground handling contracts for other carriers.
[post="230686"][/post]
Former ModerAAtor said:Another plus is that the new terminal gives us a lot more widebody gates with which to go after ground handling contracts for other carriers.
[post="230686"][/post]