June - US Pilots Labor Discussion

[Move2CLT]

Indeed.

Did you pass out mid-post?

That can't possibly be all you have to say.

 

[Move2CLT]

Ah!....so...it's only morally acceptable for a minority to seek redress from perceived injustice? No majority should have those rights as well...?

A most "interesting" little world view you have there.....

Perceived? Ya, you keep thinking that along with your three way SLI.

 

[EastUS1]

EastUS1, on 19 May 2012 - 03:44 PM, said:
Indeed.

Did you pass out mid-post?

That can't possibly be all you have to say.

I did so from a moment of pure kindness. I feared any expansion would tax you to excesses far beyond your perceptive abilities. 😉

 

[Move2CLT]

EastUS1, on 19 May 2012 - 03:44 PM, said:
Indeed.


I did so from a moment of pure kindness. I feared any expansion would tax you to excesses far beyond your perceptive abilities. 😉

Wow, still a fairly curt response. Are you mad at me or the fact that the Nic is the list?

 

[EastUS1]

Are you mad at me or the fact that the Nic is the list?

As you generously afford continual amusement; by no means is anger any issue here. 😉

 

[BoeingBoy]

Sniffle...

Yet another bunch of words that only says that the east can do what it wants and the west is helpless to resist the majority. Completely ignoring fairness being nothing but a perception. What it amounts to is you demand that your percption of fairness be supreme while other's is "BS" as you put it...

Nice hypocracy...

Jim

 

[Move2CLT]

As you generously afford continual amusement; by no means is anger any issue here. 😉

Interesting. I see it the same way with you.

 

[EastUS1]

What it amounts to is you demand that your percption of fairness be supreme while other's is "BS" as you put it...

Nice hypocracy...

Again; yet more complete BS. My beliefs as to what's "The right thing to do" in this case, depend not even in the very least on majority vs minority status, nor which "side" I'm on, win or lose. "Hypocrisy" (might wish to check your spelling) would require modification of those core beliefs to suit some supposedly "abused" minority's wishes, and be based purely on conditional circumstance.

 

[BoeingBoy]

Yet more "My belief's are the only one's that count".....every else should bow down before my superiority...LOL

Jim

 

[signals]

Yet more "My belief's are the only one's that count".....every else should bow down before my superiority...LOL

Jim

That seems to be happening a lot here...nuf sed

 

[EastUS1]

Yet more "My belief's are the only one's that count".....every else should bow down before my superiority...LOL

Jim

Hardly. It's incumbent on each person to determine what their beliefs are. As you're evidently incapable of arguing any issues of actual principle, and can instead, offer up...well...NOTHING....I'll leave the "every else should bow down before my superiority" ..ummm..."argument" for your exclusive use. 😉

 

[traderjake]

"Hypocrisy" (might wish to check your spelling) .

Ummm...perhaps the "Bindin" part?

"Binding" (might wish to check your spelling).

 

[EastUS1]

"Binding" (you might wish to check your spelling).

That was a direct quote from the poster's erroneous entry, which I intended for purposes of jest. "Perhaps" YOU should check your reading "skills" 😉

 

[BoeingBoy]

issues of actual principle

You mean those situational principles...worth fighting tooth and nail for in one case but not in another...

Jim

 

[EastUS1]

You mean those situational principles...worth fighting tooth and nail for in one case but not in another...

Jim

"....but not in another..."....?

What case would that be? As you're the evidenced expert on "situational principles", I'll leave the floor open for you.