Ms Tree said:Since he seems to phrase it as an all or nothing, who pays for the police, fire, hospitals, schools, roads, FAA, airports, ports .... ?
Hope you ducked when it went over your head....
Ms Tree said:Since he seems to phrase it as an all or nothing, who pays for the police, fire, hospitals, schools, roads, FAA, airports, ports .... ?
Ms Tree said:Since he seems to phrase it as an all or nothing, who pays for the police, fire, hospitals, schools, roads, FAA, airports, ports .... ?
So pork spending condemns all of it?SparrowHawk said:
More Liberal BS and you haven't answered the question posed.
The Federal Income tax account for about 36% of total federal revenue or roughly the same amount as the TARP bailout.So the other 65% pays for your roards and all the liberal BS argument. No private company ever built the road to nowhere or the "Bud" Schuster Highway. For that kind of waste you need government.
Ms Tree said:Like I said, even if you want to assume 50% waste you are still $700 billion short.
One of the problems I see with your plan is that when times are bad, donations dry up and that is when people need the most assistance.
Country =/= house.eolesen said:Not with the current politicians we have it isn't.
But, there's no reason it shouldn't be as simple as "don't spend more than you make"...
Ms Tree said:Take an Econ class. Running a house is not the same as running a country.
Ms Tree said:What ever you say. I think this gives some insight as to why libertarians cant get elected into office on a broad scale.
Nothing like a proud sexist.
Obviously, income >= expenses is too complicated of a concept for you.Ms Tree said:Country =/= house.