What's new

Mitt Romney plans to name Congressman Paul Ryan as his vice president

Ryan is quite good at telling the media how he wants to be portrayed, instead of them, you know, actually analyzing his record.

BTW Tom, I find it interesting that he wants to eviscerate Medicare (and SSN), yet voted for Part D. He's also already been an SSN recipient. And as Tree noted, he also voted for the TARP bailout, which certainly falls in the "big government" category.

For our anti labor friends on the board, he's also consistently voted to protect Davis-Bacon ('course, it's worth noting that he has family interests in construction)...

Why aren't you b!tchin' about the $716 "BILIION" dollar cuts to medicare, that will take place next year, thanks to Obamacare ?

PolitiFact, the left-leaning fact-checking site, pronounced the “ending Medicare” claim to be the 2011 Lie of the Year.
Obama has cut Medicare more than Romney-Ryan would!

http://www.forbes.com/sites/aroy/2012/08/11/why-the-democrats-mediscare-attack-wont-work-against-paul-ryan/
 
BTW, did you mean the 700B that is slated to be accomplished not by cuts per se, but by slowing the growth rate in spending? The slowing that is to come from reducing overpayments, and a crackdown on fraud/abuse? that 700?
 
'Cause this thread is about Ryan as a VP pick. Plenty of other Obamacare related threads in the cooler.

So how does MediSCARE and Barrack sqeezin' money from medicare not releate ?

"This will only come as a surprise to President Obama’s most gullible admirers: The Congressional Budget Office (CBO) now claims that the president’s signature health care legislation will cost hundreds of billions of dollars more than originally predicted."
http://www.forbes.com/sites/merrillmatthews/2012/03/15/im-shocked-obamacare-costs-more-than-promised/

Re-arranging the chairs, does not change the number of chairs !

Besides, what part of, "If you are 55 or older, nothing will change for you", do you not understand?
 

Latest posts

Back
Top