Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Unless an intervenor comes up with cards for 50% plus one for the mech and related group, the association gets the gig.iluvaa said:Can anyone explain what just happened in a nutshell
The board member that dissented , said nearly the same thing I did word for word,700UW said:But wait a minute, you kept saying you know what the representational manual says, and you said the association provided no showing of interest.
I kept telling you this situation wasnt in the representational manual, and you argued with me and NYer, forever over this.
The NMB provided the showing was made.
700UW said:But wait a minute, you kept saying you know what the representational manual says, and you said the association provided no showing of interest.
I kept telling you this situation wasnt in the representational manual, and you argued with me and NYer, forever over this.
The NMB provided the showing was made.
A dissension is a person's opinion, and it really doesnt matter, as it goes by majority rules, just like the supreme court.CMH_GSE said:The board member that dissented , said nearly the same thing I did word for word,
"Ignoring precedent", but you just keep glossing over the dissention part of the ruling because that ruins your warm fuzzies for the Ass.
Edit to add, I've read a good number of NMB decisions in the last few weeks, I've Never seen a dissention before, not saying there hasn't been, but obviously, this one smelled bad to at least one person on the board with a guilty connchiunce.
Wrong.TWU informer said:
Good for the NMB. But the dues paying member has not shown interest.
I was put in bad standing for three years for dual unionism for wearing an AMFA t-shirt, and now the TWU and IAM leadership is not only advocating dual unionism but filed an application with the NMB to request Dual Unionism. File charges and start the Kangaroo Courts ASAP.