NON-REV DOH

atoguy

Member
Feb 15, 2003
32
0

Well I have read the other thread about DOH/FCFS for nonrevs. Seems like most of that is about crews who may have trouble getting to work. Here is my issue. I have children who need to travel for visitation. And I know there are others like me at USAirways. With FCFS there would have been numerous times they would not have been boarded on flights. Even now with the change to them having to fly one step lower if I am not traveling with them. They will not get on some flights causing them to be stuck in the connecting city. This is of no concern to the company if it does create visitation problems. I sent my concern to the ROW 23 e-mail when the lower step was put in last fall when the rest of my family failed to be boarded on flights. As you can see family issues are not a concern of this or any past management. I can understand the folks at HP's concern. But senority should count for something since we have nothing left. 24 years here.
 
What I don't get about the argument "for" DOH is why people seem to think that using DOH will guarantee them a seat. There is only one person that will have a 100% guarantee with using DOH, and that's the person with the highest seniority.

Even a 30 year employee could be bumped at the last minute by a 30-year, 2-week employee.

There is NO WAY to plan for such a situation. Even if the ETC were modified to show the seniority of employees listed, that can always change up until departure time.

With using FCFS, it's easier to plan. You can always see how many employees are listed. If the number of employees listed is higher than the number of seats left, you plan ahead and check in early. If you are the first employee checked in--you will ALWAYS be the first employee checked in for that flight.

Those that argue for DOH also continually argue that they shouldn't have to rush to the airport. Are you forgetting about online check in? It can be done 12 hours ahead of time.

Also, just because the company has put dependents traveling without the employee at a lower priority--that does NOT mean they don't care about the family. The management just recognizes that EMPLOYEES should be able to use their benefits first. As an employee, if I were traveling to visit my mom on Mother's Day, I would NOT be happy if I was bumped by another employee's wife, traveling alone to do some shipping in NYC.

Seniority does count for something: it counts for higher pay, more vacation time, and better schedules (for most jobs). Traveling is a benefit: senior employees don't get better rates on health insurance. And, as pointed out in a comment to Row23 Middle, a more senior person doesn't get to go to the front of the line at the company union.
 
You can plan DOH, we have used it for years, and you can check the hire dates on the standby list and know where you sit.

Remember US was around a lot longer then HP and DOH is simple to use and fair.
 
If someone in your trave database REALLY needs to get somewhere, then buy an ED20... our "management" has extended to all employees a 20% off discount off all published fares.

Too many people confuse "non rev" as a BENEFIT, not a priviledge or right. If there happens to be an open seat for me, fantastic! If not, I take the next flight, and if I *really* need to be there, I plan ahead and use an ED20.
 
You can plan DOH, we have used it for years, and you can check the hire dates on the standby list and know where you sit.

Remember US was around a lot longer then HP and DOH is simple to use and fair.
Right now, it's not very easy or convenient to see where you stand using DOH. You would have to go to Shares, look up the PNR of every employee, and then look up their hire date.

And yes, I know the ETC could be revised to add that information.

However, once you check in for a flight, your place in line will be the same throghout the day. With DOH, that's not true. You could be the most senior person and then a more senior person wanders up.

"Fair" means different things to different people.
 
Shuttling children back and forth for visitation would be the ideal situation for the 20% off tkts.
Then, they would be positive space, too; no worries!
Thanks for the suggestion, segmentking!
Also, atoguy, you could fly to where your children are, and escort them at the higher priority.
I'm sorry for your situation, hang in there.
 
And that has what to do with DOH vs FCFS?

Once again you post on something that does not affect your nor have any dealings with.
 
Really?

How much of its own money did HP use to buy US as you claim?

Last time I checked it was a MERGER funded by outside investors.
 
Is it fair that we on the west have been just happy with FCFS and did not ask for this merger, so if we lose it we should just take it????
If the merger did not happen and U went Buh-Bye, then how many flights would your seniority get you on???
 
You've been broke for years too! Did you forget that????????


Just out of curiosity.....and wnating to stir the pit a little.....

As a CP, would you want your upgrades based on Miles Flown or FCFS? What if you were a 200K flier vs a 75K flier? What if upgrades were based on how long you have been a CP?

Just a prospective kinda thing.....
 
700 UW-love your last posts..

Outsiders know NOTHING OF OUR INTERNAL AFFAIRS. NOR SHOULD THEY! :up:
This is OUR BUSINESS.. :up:
 
Really?

How much of its own money did HP use to buy US as you claim?

Last time I checked it was a MERGER funded by outside investors.

I've told you this no less than three times on this forum. You are wrong both in rhetoric and in fact.

From the US Airways Annual Report for 2005 (http://yahoo.brand.edgar-online.com/fetchFilingFrameset.aspx?dcn=0000950124-06-001200&Type=HTML):

The merger has been accounted for as a reverse acquisition using the purchase method of accounting. As a result, although the merger was structured such that America West Holdings became a wholly owned subsidiary of US Airways Group, America West Holdings was treated as the acquiring company for accounting purposes due to the following factors: (1) America West Holdings’ stockholders received the largest share of US Airways Group’s common stock in the merger in comparison to unsecured creditors of US Airways Group; (2) America West Holdings received a larger number of designees to the board of directors; and (3) America West Holdings’ Chairman and Chief Executive Officer prior to the merger became the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the combined company.

From the bankruptcy court (http://www.donlinrecano.net/dr201/mwc/04-13819/dk002399-0004.pdf):

Although the merger is structured so that America West Holdings
will become a wholly owned subsidiary of New US Airways Group at closing, America West Holdings will
be treated as the acquiring company
for accounting purposes in accordance with Statement of Financial
Accounting Standards, or SFAS, No. 141, ‘‘Business Combinations.’’

Don't let the facts get in your way.
 

Latest posts

Back
Top