What's new

Obama Strikes again

A large number of them were deists. I could make the same argument about caring for the people in general. COTUS still does not say it.

The deist argument is utter BULLSHITE. Recently created by Christian Hating Progressive and Atheist groups worldwide. It's the moral equivalent of Holocaust denial. Don't like History that doesn't agree with your world view? Make some up by rumor conjecture and half truths. It's the Progressive way, happens all the time. Obama is a master at it.

The COTUS & DOI assumes a belief in a Creator. The specific reason "Creator" was used was to make certain that no one religion could turn the USA into a Theocracy like the one they fled from England. Additionally, the Founding Fathers.

I can think of no better use of Federal Funds than to ensure that our Armed Forces are well served by our nation.
 
The deist argument is utter BULLSHITE. Recently created by Christian Hating Progressive and Atheist groups worldwide. It's the moral equivalent of Holocaust denial. Don't like History that doesn't agree with your world view? Make some up by rumor conjecture and half truths. It's the Progressive way, happens all the time. Obama is a master at it.

The COTUS & DOI assumes a belief in a Creator. The specific reason "Creator" was used was to make certain that no one religion could turn the USA into a Theocracy like the one they fled from England. Additionally, the Founding Fathers.

I can think of no better use of Federal Funds than to ensure that our Armed Forces are well served by our nation.


Their papers tell a different story but believe what you want.

I can think of other ways to spend federal funds that are not covered by the COTUS as well. Still not covered by the COTUS.
 
Since 777 did not push the issue I will. The COTUS only provides for the creation of a military. It makes no comment on their medical needs any more than it does on the medical needs of the people. So the soldiers need to fend for them selves once they are out of the service. After all, it's not in the COTUS.


Neither is gay marriage.
 
Their papers tell a different story but believe what you want.

I can think of other ways to spend federal funds that are not covered by the COTUS as well. Still not covered by the COTUS.

Like I said you're the moral equivalent of a Holocaust Denier.

You can post 300 links to prove your side of the argument and so can I, the difference is mine are from respected historians while yours are from Progressive historical revisionists.
 
Obama signs anti-protest Trespass Bill

Only days after clearing Congress, US President Barack Obama signed his name to H.R. 347 on Thursday, officially making it a federal offense to cause a disturbance at certain political events — essentially criminalizing protest in the States.

RT broke the news last month that H.R. 347, the Federal Restricted Buildings and Grounds Improvement Act of 2011, had overwhelmingly passed the US House of Representatives after only three lawmakers voted against it. On Thursday this week, President Obama inked his name to the legislation and authorized the government to start enforcing a law that has many Americans concerned over how the bill could bury the rights to assemble and protest as guaranteed in the US Constitution.

Under H.R. 347, which has more commonly been labeled the Trespass Bill by Congress, knowingly entering a restricted area that is under the jurisdiction of Secret Service protection can garner an arrest. The law is actually only a slight change to earlier legislation that made it an offense to knowingly and willfully commit such a crime. Under the Trespass Bill’s latest language chance, however, someone could end up in law enforcement custody for entering an area that they don’t realize is Secret Service protected and “engages in disorderly or disruptive conduct” or “impede or disrupt the orderly conduct of Government business or official functions.”


Source: Internet, www.http://rt.com. NOTE: going forward I will cite sources but no longer provide hot links. I'm not here to do your work for you. Learn how a Libertarian is self reliant and look it up yourself.

Was this the Hope and Change YOU voted for?
 
Like I said you're the moral equivalent of a Holocaust Denier.

You can post 300 links to prove your side of the argument and so can I, the difference is mine are from respected historians while yours are from Progressive historical revisionists.

I guess if you say so it must be true.
 
I guess if you say so it must be true.

It's true. Lucky for you they don't have interment camps for Atheists. They could since apparently given my previous post the Government seeks to squash all dissent.
 
BAM ! That had to hurt !
Let me know when you find any reference to marriage in the COTUS. Ill wait.

Any laws enacted must be done so in accordance with the COTUS. That's where the 14th amendment comes into play. That is what guarantees that all people will be allowed to marry. The only thing that hurts is your ignorance of how the COTUS and US legal system work.
 
Let me know when you find any reference to marriage in the COTUS. Ill wait.

Any laws enacted must be done so in accordance with the COTUS. That's where the 14th amendment comes into play. That is what guarantees that all people will be allowed to marry. The only thing that hurts is your ignorance of how the COTUS works much less the US legal system.

what a single issue drone!

The "trespass bill" goes unnoticed, yet we have page upon page on gay marriage. No wonder we're where we are
 
Start a thread. If it is interesting who knows what will happen. I can multi-tasks.

Personally I place a very high priority in equal rights.
 
Start a thread. If it is interesting who knows what will happen. I can multi-tasks.

Personally I place a very high priority in equal rights.

All are endowed by their creator with equal rights. This thread was designed for a variety of topics the least of which In my mind is gay rights. Because Gays don't have rights, individuals have rights. The thread topic is "Obama Strikes Again" referring to his actions against Freedom and Liberty.
 
All are endowed by their creator with equal rights. This thread was designed for a variety of topics the least of which In my mind is gay rights. Because Gays don't have rights, individuals have rights. The thread topic is "Obama Strikes Again" referring to his actions against Freedom and Liberty.


I guess it's a good thing that gays are looking for equal rights then huh? All people might be entitled to equal rights but the current law regarding marriage seems to have a different take on it.

This thread has the original topic of the Keystone pipeline. Not sure where freedom and liberty come into play on that but have at it. It has already been shown that NE was and still is against the route of the pipeline and that they are the ones tossing a wrench in the works. I guess Obama could have told NE to pound sand but I am sure you would have been upset about that as well. The fact that it is a republican legislature and governor is the cherry on top of the banana split.
 
I guess it's a good thing that gays are looking for equal rights then huh? All people might be entitled to equal rights but the current law regarding marriage seems to have a different take on it.

This thread has the original topic of the Keystone pipeline. Not sure where freedom and liberty come into play on that but have at it. It has already been shown that NE was and still is against the route of the pipeline and that they are the ones tossing a wrench in the works. I guess Obama could have told NE to pound sand but I am sure you would have been upset about that as well. The fact that it is a republican legislature and governor is the cherry on top of the banana split.

Forget it it. As long as Adam and Steve get to bone each other up the assets that's all you care about when you're not busy hating Christians. I'm done! Once clueless always clueless.

Did you know they found a Lesbian Dinosaur? YEP it's called a "Lickalottapuss", Yep they are going to put it on the endanged species so Adam and Steve can't drill each other all night. 😀
 
I have posted in most child of the threads here so I am not sure where the single issue thing comes from.

i am sorry that my concern for equal rights distresses you so much. Perhaps if you were not so blinded by your religious dogma you would see clearer. Oh well. Last time I cheeked Am and his friends are not mentioned in the COTUS. What else ya got?
 

Latest posts

Back
Top