PBS Colorado 911 Explosive Evidence

[eolesen]

One of the guys I hired a few years back worked in EOD in the Marine Corps, and he debunked the whole "it was rigged" argument that some of the 9/11 truthers spout off.

Almost all explosives degrade over time. Dynamite & TNT will leech out the nitroglycerin within a few years. C4 only has a shelf life of ~6 months before it gets taken for controlled demolition. Semtex will last up to about 5 years. When they become unstable, and the slightest vibrations can set it off.

If the towers were indeed rigged, it would have had to have been done during Clinton's second term or the first few months of the Bush presidency, and that's something that might have drawn a bit of attention on the internet before the attacks....

 

[delldude]

One of the guys I hired a few years back worked in EOD in the Marine Corps, and he debunked the whole "it was rigged" argument that some of the 9/11 truthers spout off.

Almost all explosives degrade over time. Dynamite & TNT will leech out the nitroglycerin within a few years. C4 only has a shelf life of ~6 months before it gets taken for controlled demolition. Semtex will last up to about 5 years. When they become unstable, and the slightest vibrations can set it off.

If the towers were indeed rigged, it would have had to have been done during Clinton's second term or the first few months of the Bush presidency, and that's something that might have drawn a bit of attention on the internet before the attacks....

 
I understand your point. The video in question delved into that specific issue. It appears that some type of construction at the WTC's was an ongoing issue all the time. So construction workers moving work boxes and equipment is a normal everyday thing.
Also, who knows if specific known explosives were indeed used. In fact, who knows what really happened at all.
If it was legitimate, do you think operatives would be moving labeled boxes of class 1 or 2 explosives?  LOL

 

[Ms Tree]

One article I read a few years ago argues that an army of people just walked the explosives into the building stashed in brief case, boxes and suit case in a matter of hours. Placed that at statistic points and ....... Boom.

Sheer lunacy.

 

[delldude]

One article I read a few years ago argues that an army of people just walked the explosives into the building stashed in brief case, boxes and suit case in a matter of hours. Placed that at statistic points and ....... Boom.

Sheer lunacy.

 
Like most of your posts....

 

[delldude]

"For example, according to www.911research.wtc7.net, steel melts at a temperature of 2,777 degrees Fahrenheit, but jet fuel burns at only 1,517 degrees F. No melted steel, no collapsed towers. "The planes did not bring those towers down; bombs did," says www.abovetopsecret.com. Wrong. In an article in the Journal of the Minerals, Metals, and Materials Society and in subsequent interviews, Thomas Eagar, an engineering professor at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, explains why: steel loses 50 percent of its strength at 1,200 degrees F; 90,000 liters of jet fuel ignited other combustible materials such as rugs, curtains, furniture and paper, which continued burning after the jet fuel was exhausted, raising temperatures above 1,400 degrees F and spreading the inferno throughout each building. Temperature differentials of hundreds of degrees across single steel horizontal trusses caused them to sag--straining and then breaking the angle clips that held the beams to the vertical columns. Once one truss failed, others followed. When one floor collapsed onto the next floor below, that floor subsequently gave way, creating a pancaking effect that triggered each 500,000-ton structure to crumble. Conspiricists argue that the buildings should have fallen over on their sides, but with 95 percent of each building consisting of air, they could only have collapsed straight down."

http://www.scientificamerican.com/article.cfm?id=fahrenheit-2777

 
And you missed the Underwriters Laboratory sagging beam test to prove that was how the WTC floors all fell atop one another as requested by the NIST investigation?
 
UL duplicated a fire based on evidence from the WTC event and the beams never sagged......duh
 
It's all in the videos.......
 
I like how these clowns argue incessantly against a thread while never having read or looked at what should be the topic of discussion.

 

[delldude]

Evidence supports controlled demolition. 2200 Architects and Engineers worked together and came up with rather unsettling evidence.
 

 
August 1, 2014
Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth
Richard Gage talked about his group, Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth, which claimed that the World Trade Center was brought down by explosive demolition on September 11, 2001. The group was founded in 2006 and said its mission was to “expose the official lies and cover-up surrounding the events of September 11, 2001 in a way that inspires the people to overcome denial and understand the truth.” Mr. Gage spoke via video link from San Francisco, California.http://www.c-span.org/video/?320748-5/washington-journal-architects-engineers-911-truth

 

 

[AdAstraPerAspera]

Funny how all the people with actual reason an intelligence are skeptical, but the moonbats are itching for a conspiracy.
 
Believing that there is a grand scheme to everything that is somehow (against all principles of human nature) kept miraculously quiet, is actually a mental disorder: http://www.slate.com/articles/health_and_science/science/2013/11/conspiracy_theory_psychology_people_who_claim_to_know_the_truth_about_jfk.html

 

[delldude]

Funny how all the people with actual reason an intelligence are skeptical, but the moonbats are itching for a conspiracy.
 
Believing that there is a grand scheme to everything that is somehow (against all principles of human nature) kept miraculously quiet, is actually a mental disorder: http://www.slate.com/articles/health_and_science/science/2013/11/conspiracy_theory_psychology_people_who_claim_to_know_the_truth_about_jfk.html

 
Didn't watch the video in my previous post from the same people as my last post, did you?
 
 
They say the same for progressive liberalism.

 

[SparrowHawk]

Good points, Jake.
 
Quag's will take the opinion of 2100 IPCC government subsidized scientists as gospel.
 
2100 Architects forensically dispute NIST investigation claims and they are wackos.
 
And in his sourcing, I didn't see anyone dispute the Assoc of Architects claims.

 
Quag is a Government is the answer guy. He trusts Government and look how well that turned out for the Indians.

 

[777 fixer]

Evidence supports controlled demolition. 2200 Architects and Engineers worked together and came up with rather unsettling evidence.
 

 

 
Actually evidence supports that the Jews did it.

 

[delldude]

 
Actually evidence supports that the Jews did it.

 
They never made a claim as to who did it, just forensic evidence points to a controlled demolition......don't want to stick your neck out and be objective?

 

[777 fixer]

 
They never made a claim as to who did it, just forensic evidence points to a controlled demolition......don't want to stick your neck out and be objective?

 
Did I say that they did?  Google Mossad 9-11 and see what you get.  I think you can be objective enough.  😉

 

[delldude]

 
Did I say that they did?  Google Mossad 9-11 and see what you get.  I think you can be objective enough.   😉

 
Only concerned about the forensic evidence.

 

[777 fixer]

Here's another one for you.
 
http://www.neonnettle.com/news/211-ex-cia-pilot-gives-sworn-testimony-that-no-planes-hit-the-twin-towers
 
Now with a last name like Lear and all that experience in aviation it must be true right?

 

[delldude]

Here's another one for you.
 
http://www.neonnettle.com/news/211-ex-cia-pilot-gives-sworn-testimony-that-no-planes-hit-the-twin-towers
 
Now with a last name like Lear and all that experience in aviation it must be true right?

 
Forensic evidence is the concern, not changing the narrative because you can't challenge the evidence found.