MetalMover
Veteran
- Joined
- Sep 16, 2013
- Messages
- 3,543
- Reaction score
- 2,410
The title of this post says it all!
Double dipping in violation of the TWU constitution. A union member filed a complaint. He decided to stay with the International instead of going back to the position he was elected. The International pays more money and has better benefits.That was short lived. Forced out? Leaves lots of questions...
October 3, 2018]
That having been said, I want to be clear upfront that I cannot vote to bring back an agreement which might eliminate hundreds of days and afternoon shift jobs across the country if we were to agree to the company scope demand which takes the aircraft moves away from Aircraft Maintenance, and/or the company demand which increases Line Maintenance outsourcing. Station Protection may make a great company soundbite, but station protection does not mean “shift protection,” and I do not want to see any more Members of this Local rolling backwards towards midnight shift.
Fraternally,
Gary Schaible
TWU Local 591 President
And there they go again. Get out that daily bag of rocks and start throwing boys.
I guess it would be just impossible to say congratulations to two of your own? Nnnaaaahhhhh!!!!!
Sorry, WeAAz.. His letter was all good until "shift protection" was mentioned.
Sorry, this is how I read it.
WeAAz, we are in a 24/7, 365 day a year operation, rain or shine. Do you really expect the company to design schedules and operations around personal preference? Why don't they just put all of us on day shift. And sit planes down on afts and mids? Good idea? Why not stop flying on weekends and holidays while we're at it?I get where he’s going with his comment. He’s trying to emphasize a quality of life issue. Like I said earlier today and before. What turned me off on taking the road to joining your profession was the idea of being stuck on Midnights for a decade.
I hired in at 30. So let’s say 5 years to get my A&P and get on in the craft. So we’re talking 45 years “OLD” till I got on to afternoons.
They keep taking work away from you and eventually how long does it take to get off nights now? 15? 20 years? More depending on where you work?
Like I said I get what he meant by “shift protection” myself.
Money isn’t everything.
WeAAz, we are in a 24/7, 365 day a year operation, rain or shine. Do you really expect the company to design schedules and operations around personal preference? Why don't they just put all of us on day shift. And sit planes down on afts and mids? Good idea? Why not stop flying on weekends and holidays while we're at it?
BTW, when I started in this business, I knew very well I would be on midnights for many years. I knew my time would come to get the choice shifts, vacations and days off.
It's called putting one's time in.
WeAAz, there are no guarantees. If the company ever chooses to keep minimums on days and afts and beef up mids, then that is their choice.Metal of course we haven’t read the details of what the Company is talking about in regards to how they intend to at least temporarily protect work for those of us currently on the clock. But I’m sure Gary is talking about shifts in the terms of how many are actually available and need to be staffed? (Note question mark)
Let’s say the Conpany doesn’t get the amount of people they need to take the buyout to shrink the workforce to fit the contract Scope? Who’s to say how they may staff any overages and how people off nights could slip back onto them?
Since you hired on have there been times where people have slipped backwards?
Now if you want so I don’t get accused again today of being an arrogant know it all, I’ll say that I’m assuming that’s what Gary was thinking when he wrote that comment?
Besides if the Association say did allow the Company to gut your Scope (Besides the fact I’d hope you’d vote no) how long might it take the new hire coming in tomorrow to get off nights again I’m asking?
WeAAz, there are no guarantees. If the company ever chooses to keep minimums on days and afts and beef up mids, then that is their choice.
And I know exactly the intent of his wording. It is one thing to fight to keep jobs. In this case, aircraft moves which require manning on all 3 shifts. But to insinuate he wants shift protection is utterly ridiculous!
Another don vDouble dipping in violation of the TWU constitution. A union member filed a complaint. He decided to stay with the International instead of going back to the position he was elected. The International pays more money and has better benefits.
He still would have remained in negotiations if he chose to go back to 591. Follow the money. Elections are coming soon and if he got voted out he would have lost his salary and be down to one salary and work under the same benefits as us poor slobs. This way he collects two salaries plus benefits from the international and AA. He has a job to do but in the end Gary is looking out for Gary. If things fall apart in negotiations or the companys financial situation gets bleak we will take hits but not Gary. He has the international parachute. The international takes care of themselves in thick and thin. Bottom line.