I beleave that there has been NO action from the IAM since the hand over.
Relative to the last admin., there has been plenty more... Not nearly enough, of course, but some.
It's easy to update the IAM website KEV with so much inaction. Next to zero info on what is being done to even things up between what the pilots have received and what needs to be changed with the other contracts "ME too".
The pilots' contract improvements were a "give to get," where they tabled a grievance in return for the improvements they received. The $$ they got was equal to what the grievance would have paid (at least that's my understanding).
No talk of getting the work back that is rightfuly ours. "Fleet service"
This is where we agree 100%. The IAM should immediately do 2 things, IMO: 1. Secure CRJ-900/Mesaba language the same way they did E75s. 2. Permanently protect the 40 stations that are still in existence. These are, IMO, "cost neutral," and would only cost the company the price of the extra ink for 2 pages in our CBA. From there, they should work on other items.
Sh*t we haven't even seen a book printed out two years after the fact even though the website says they are amost done.
No argument here, either. What you and I both know is that the holdup was due to the 2 parties fighting over the language in article 5 (Part Time ESE's). The fact that it took almost 2 years to hash out is inexcusable, but if nothing else, I'm glad they at least fought it out.
If Bobby is going to be your whipping boy for the bad deal we got from the company have fun but don't prop up the current administation in the IAM because I haven't seen crap from them.
I'm no apologist for the current admin. However, I have seen more responsiveness from these guys than I ever saw from the last crowd.
Hell I've got more action in my favor out of NWA, the devil themselves, than my own union. I liked the tough talk that Bobby had been doing precontact,
That's just it; it was all hot air. When push came top shove he caved. Long before it came to a vote.
At the end of the day, Bobby sent out a letter basically telling anyone who could leave to do so. And of course, it contained the IAM boilerplate about "having a gun to our heads." While I'm at it, Bobby's obsession with pensions (which were going to be frozen either way) cost a lot of mid-seniority guys a lot of scope and other items.
The fact that both Julie Hagen-Showers and Doug Steenland had kind praise for him is more damning of testimony than anything I could ever type here.
the members weren't brave enough to walk the talk.
I know, and it sucks. A lot of fear mongering by both the company and IAM did little to help things.
.