Garfield1966,Sep 7 2005, 05:43 PM]
You guys really need to come up with some better material.
This is the most entertaining reading I have had in years
Keep up the good work guys / gals.
So which is it, we need new material or keep up the good work?
SO far all I have seen is a quote from one article with no other evidence. OH yea, 1 person was spotted? Big whoop. I am sure he is the ONLY person (replacement worker or other wise) who has ever been "caught".
One caught in only two weeks.
Geee let's think back ... OH yea, the HP pilots, the NW pilot that someone mentioned.
Ok so at NWA they have one incident in a two week span, and you named two other incidences in a what, 20 year span? So if we compare the rates it comes out to 26/yr times 20= 520 to 2. So the chances of having someone under the influence of alchohol working on your plane are 260 times greater when they are scabs.
Are we holding the replacement workers to a higher standard? If you are holding an entire work force responsible for one persons supposed actions, then you are all in a heap of trouble.
Well isnt it true that all Transportation workers have been subjected to Random drug and Alchohol testing because of one train conductor that was under the influence of marajuana and involved in a fatal accident twenty years ago?