I have worked on both sides of the fence, union and non-union, over a 30-year period. I can say from experience this is how it is: When things are going great and you are doing your job in a non-union environment things are peachy. But, when things turn sour in an economic turndown, the non-union places suddenly become hostile. I have seen people furloughed that had years of service and new hires stayed because they were better workers and made less. I have seen benefits taken away at a whim; just because and if you don't like it you can be replaced. Basically it comes down to human nature. Without getting into a belief system discussion, I will just say the dark side of the human element shines through brightly in a non-union environment, especially when things are not going well, but even when things are ok employees are sometimes abused. Employees that are treated unfairly must endure whatever is handed them or simply quit. If what I am saying is false, and mankind was basically good minus the dark side, unions would not exist, but they do for these very reasons. Dave and his hatchet men would have a ball if we were a non-union airline, but since there are unionized, he is held accountable and must treat people fair and as equals. Look at what he does even with unions, and then imagine Dave’s actions left unfettered.BoeingBoy said:A320Driver,
"Makes sense to me union or no union. First in , last out."
I agree with the sentiment - that's why I've often said a union is better than no union, warts and all.
However, I suspect Siegel would love to replace us old-timers with new-hires off the street as fast as he could train them, pay them whatever he wanted, few benes, and no retirement.
Jim