Art at ISP
Veteran
Before I begin, let me say up front that I do not mean to diminish the importance of the labor or other financial issues going on here, nor am I doing this as "another spoiled customer". I am merely attempting to point out some more penny wise and pound foolish steps by the powers that be.......and in the general scheme of things they DO make a difference.
I recently had two back to back trips--one on US one on UA. There was no comparison between the two in the actual product. UA is obviously making the effort to retain the business traveler, while US appears to be more concerned with the leisure traveler--UA's F product keeps getting better while US' F product just keeps slipping into the sunset.
US F vs UA F
UA has a full meal service on a 2 hour flight, not the half a happy meal...why can't U?
UA has glassware in F.......why can't U?
UA has silverware (except knives)......why can't U?
UA has full linen service in F-tablecloth AND napkin....why can't U?
UA still has hot towels in F.....why can't U?
On a midcon flight (LGA-DEN), they even do a second "snack" service prior to arrival....nice.
I have become conditioned to lower my expectations of U's F product--I upgrade because of the added comfort, not necessarily the meal/amenity. However, it is interesting to note that UA's financial condition has been as bad if not worse than U's, yet they choose to make the F class product better than the competiton not worse.
The crews on ALL flights were great--even SNA-DEN although a bit stressed out they were good.
Also it seems that they are marketing the Channel 9 feature as an exclusive--which it is--and they point it out to customers much more frequently...
It is apparent UA is capitalizing on their strengths while it is entirely possible that U doesn't even know what theirs are.......
Had I been a customer without affiliation to one or the other, I know which I would choose for future travel......
If U want's to get rid of F let them do it completely, not in steps as it appears they are....
My best to you all..........
I recently had two back to back trips--one on US one on UA. There was no comparison between the two in the actual product. UA is obviously making the effort to retain the business traveler, while US appears to be more concerned with the leisure traveler--UA's F product keeps getting better while US' F product just keeps slipping into the sunset.
US F vs UA F
UA has a full meal service on a 2 hour flight, not the half a happy meal...why can't U?
UA has glassware in F.......why can't U?
UA has silverware (except knives)......why can't U?
UA has full linen service in F-tablecloth AND napkin....why can't U?
UA still has hot towels in F.....why can't U?
On a midcon flight (LGA-DEN), they even do a second "snack" service prior to arrival....nice.
I have become conditioned to lower my expectations of U's F product--I upgrade because of the added comfort, not necessarily the meal/amenity. However, it is interesting to note that UA's financial condition has been as bad if not worse than U's, yet they choose to make the F class product better than the competiton not worse.
The crews on ALL flights were great--even SNA-DEN although a bit stressed out they were good.
Also it seems that they are marketing the Channel 9 feature as an exclusive--which it is--and they point it out to customers much more frequently...
It is apparent UA is capitalizing on their strengths while it is entirely possible that U doesn't even know what theirs are.......
Had I been a customer without affiliation to one or the other, I know which I would choose for future travel......
If U want's to get rid of F let them do it completely, not in steps as it appears they are....
My best to you all..........