I still don't understand this......
I will keep saying this until I'm blue in the face.
WHY is trying to obtain some of what we lost has become a bad thing?
All people are trying to do is obtain SOME of what we lost (during BK & 9/11)
This is supposed to be the biggest airline in the world and should be setting the standard for excellence, not trying to catch up, especially on the issue of "industry standard pay". We were 'promised" by our "leaders" that we were to get it all back by making all of those concessions. What happened? If we don't ask, we surely won't get any back, that's for sure.
All the NW people are trying to tell the DL people that keeping a CBA is a must, because they don't completely trust Anderson and Steenland. If you can't see that the "pay increase" announcement was strictly a "Lorenzo" move to divide the Union and Non-Union workforces. He could have just said that ALL workgroups will be getting increases, that's all. Any airline insider can see what's going on.......
BTW: how are the DL / NW integration teams coming along, and does the NW employees have some input on how to deal with Anderson?
I can see why the NW people still want to retain their CBA's because they've seen Anderson in action and knows his tactics before. I know that the DL people haven't seen him action yet, but they will soon......
In my personal opinion, this is all about the propaganda about the Unions. You can see it with the auto bailout. Management have been pissing away money and have been running their respective companies into the ground. (Yesterday's hearing didn't help their case, either) But if they fail, ALL of us will be paying those pensions (thru the pension board - ask any retired United worker how that's coming along?), and dealing with the consequences afterwards. All of those benefits were won during hard fought negotiations. Negotiating is "give and take" - you always ask for a higher number first, then work downwards. Management agreed to it and that's that. Concessions were made, and agreed to by the UAW. (Not as bad as what we took in the airline industry though.....) But some of the politicians want them all to go thru BK and restructure. That won't be very easy, like the airline industry was. (ask United.....) All of us will get hurt directly or indirectly.
(BTW: Why isn't the oil companies who have been making record profits involved in this one? Oil is needed in the American economy for one basic reason - TRANSPORTATION.)
Good paying jobs are hard to come by in this economy, and holding on to what you got will be tough.
But you don't have to work for slave wages and bad work rules. If you have a boss or management who is forward thinking, treat your employees well, pay them fairly and get the production (and income) that is needed to sustain the business, then a Union is not needed. That's cool. But as you can see, the airline business is littered with bad management (Tilton; Parker; Arpey; and Anderson) so CBA's are needed to make sure that management won't take everything from the workers who are keeping the airline running. This is not hard to understand at all. Don't be blinded by all the propaganda and BS out there.
(Hey Kev: We did get that differential pay for "Market" cities over "System" cities by 1.00 per hr. more Plus another 2% increase for 1/09. A total of 6% in increases plus the differential + 401k dollar for dollar match thru 2 years (07/09) is a start - not what we gave up, but at least it is a start.)