2014 Fleet Service Discussion
- Thread starter Falcon
- Start date
- Status
robbedagain
Veteran
- Joined
- Oct 13, 2003
- Messages
- 11,125
- Reaction score
- 2,676
roa whats your take on the scs status come say july we all know tim version and 700 whats your take on it as well?
That was a task, here is the link to the Arbitration Decision:
http://www.goiam.org/publications/pdfs/US.Airways.Airbus.Arbitration.Decision.pdf
http://www.goiam.org/publications/pdfs/US.Airways.Airbus.Arbitration.Decision.pdf
roabilly
Veteran
- Joined
- Feb 17, 2008
- Messages
- 2,136
- Reaction score
- 2,355
According to Tim, my take... is it that it means nothing, and I’ve sided with what he calls... “My Boys”...robbedagain said:
In reality, I tend to agree with 700... SCS can probably be delayed to preserve leverage if need be. Of course, this would send it into a case of legal wrangling just like the one 700 provided links to. In essence, I think it would be deemed a minor dispute, and would play out as the Airbus arbitration did. Of course, that’s just my opinion, and not necessarily what WILL actually happen.
Now, for the record... I haven’t pledged my VOTE to anyone... period. I do not hang out with, or communicate with anyone that is an AGC, or on the Negotiating Committee. What I’m attempting to do is separate fact from fiction. Of course, since sometimes that doesn't parallel what Tim says, I’m a liar, moron, and drinking Kool-aid!
There have been and will be high level talks between the IAM and TWU about the SCS.
It all depends on if US and the IAM are able to reach and ratify new CBAs in Section 6.
I believe the Alliance Vote will have to take place before the IAM and TWU do anything about the SCS.
I also believe it is a minor dispute and have provided as much information as I can on the matter.
Unlike the resident hater.
It all depends on if US and the IAM are able to reach and ratify new CBAs in Section 6.
I believe the Alliance Vote will have to take place before the IAM and TWU do anything about the SCS.
I also believe it is a minor dispute and have provided as much information as I can on the matter.
Unlike the resident hater.
robbedagain
Veteran
- Joined
- Oct 13, 2003
- Messages
- 11,125
- Reaction score
- 2,676
thanks roa and 700 id imagine too that it would depend on the sect 6 talks plus the alliance vote and ive long had the feeling that the iam and the twu both will have if not already begun high level talks on the scs
Tim,
Regarding the MOU and if there are disputes, there is a resolution process spelled out in bullet point 9. If the TWU was not the representative for any of the 7 groups in the MOU, would the raises go away? IMO, the raises would stay in effect. In your opinion, can anything in the MOU be changed?
P. Rez
Regarding the MOU and if there are disputes, there is a resolution process spelled out in bullet point 9. If the TWU was not the representative for any of the 7 groups in the MOU, would the raises go away? IMO, the raises would stay in effect. In your opinion, can anything in the MOU be changed?
P. Rez
P.Rez,
Thanks for the info, I just read it and seem Tim is being dishonest again, paragraph 9 clearly states any disputes go to arbitration.
http://twu514.org/files/2013/02/MOU1-25-13.pdf
Thanks for the info, I just read it and seem Tim is being dishonest again, paragraph 9 clearly states any disputes go to arbitration.
http://twu514.org/files/2013/02/MOU1-25-13.pdf
Tim Nelson
Veteran
Stop it! Stop insulting all of us by telling us that the twu will intentionally breach its agreement. The company isnt going to breach the 4.3% either. Stop the fairy tales. Its in the agreement and its non negotiable.700UW said:
You are truly clueless.
The MOU has clearly stated any disputes go to arbitration.
Its not a breach, it would be a grievance and goes to arbitration,
You are the one who conveniently left that part out, thanks to people who know what is going on that actually provided the proof and facts that it wont go to court and cost the TWU millions and bankrupt them.
Stop with the lies and drama, it wont further your power quest, only shows you lied again.
The MOU has clearly stated any disputes go to arbitration.
Its not a breach, it would be a grievance and goes to arbitration,
You are the one who conveniently left that part out, thanks to people who know what is going on that actually provided the proof and facts that it wont go to court and cost the TWU millions and bankrupt them.
Stop with the lies and drama, it wont further your power quest, only shows you lied again.
Tim Nelson
Veteran
Its not a matter of opinion. The single carrier application is locked in within 6 months of effective date. Either the association or the twu will have to file it or it breaches the agreement. Has nothing to do with opinion.P. REZ said:
Any breach of that process will leave AH filing and claiming severe damages.
Tim Nelson
Veteran
the single carrier will b filed in july per contract. The nmb will rule on that and that usually only takes a month. The association will file it on behalf of the twu. The nmb ruling will call for an election late this year in which case the association will win.737823 said:
The Alliance agreement is in effect between the IAM and the TWU at the International level, the joint representation has to be voted on.737823 said:
Dont let the facts get in your way.
So you are calling Parker, Horton, the UCC, the Bankruptcy Court, the DOJ, the DOT and your fellow Wall Streeters who think it is a great idea, stupid?
- Status
