You still dont grasp it.Tim Nelson said:Ask yourself, why does AH want single carrier? The synergies from single carrier are suppost to be over a billion dollars a year. Im sure AH would have a good corporate attorney asking for severe damages to intentionally violating a contract. Will the twu risk its very existence for 5,000 usairways rampers? HELL NO.
You and I know this but you intentionally lie and mislead members into thinking that the Twu is going to violate its contract and you continually hype up how the nmb is going to release our peeps every two months, when you know full well that most realize the nmb isnt even close to issuing an impasse.
You could be a rock star if you made a movie "700 in Wonderland".
Cmon maaaaaannnn.
Because there is an SCS filed doesnt mean their will be synergies.
Hasnt actual history at US shown you this.
The pilots have had an SCS since 2006 yet there is no synergies and there is no JCBA and they are still working under their respective CBAs since the merger.
The flight attendants worked under an SCS and it took them EIGHT years to get a JCBA.
Where are those synergies?
I showed you examples of UA and CO were there was an SCS and no JCBA and separate CBA negotiated for PMUA and PMCO for the M&R and the FAs.
No synergies there either.
So even if an SCS is filed doesnt guarantee that the TWU and IAM will end Section 6 Negotiations and achieve an JCBA.
No synergies there either.
And if the TWU files the SCS they will violate the agreement they signed with the IAM.
And even if they file the SCS, both the IAM and the TWU will file for the alliance and bring it to a vote.
Still no synergies there.
So show us your knowledge and show the board what damages it will cause the new AA and what "pain" it will cause the TWU.
I have asked you several times all ready and you keep avoiding the reality of the situation.
Its 5,000 ramp and over 4,000 M&R and MTS.