What's new

2014 Fleet Service Discussion

Status
Not open for further replies.
700UW said:
What proposal?

Show the board an official publication from the Negotiating Committee, the District or the International, which states it.

You cant so it's your word, and we know how valuable that is.
Time will show. Just quit bull S my peeps. And that goes for prez as well. I said what i said and sometimes the bull s from you guys gets so insulting that i have to interject. I know our membership damn sure deserves at least the amr wage right now, not a year from now...right now. And i have no idea on earth what our nc is doing if it doesnt bring in more scope.
 
Tim Nelson said:
Time will show. Just quit bull S my peeps. And that goes for prez as well.
 
Tim Nelson said:
Time will show. Just quit bull S my peeps. And that goes for prez as well.
Tim,
 
I don't bs anybody. I have always tried to do what is best for Union members my whole career. Have I made mistakes, sure and I wish I could reverse them, but I have always done the right thing for labor at AW and US. 
 
P. Rez
 
You didnt go to federal court, the DOL and the IAM made a voluntarily agreement to redo nominations, tell the truth, not everyone got notice of nominations and elections.

You and josh are two peas in a pod, lies and misinformation.
 
BS your peeps?

They are not your peeps, you have been removed from office twice now, you have never won an election at the district or international level.

Your a bitter member who ran away from CLT, after all the crap you caused.
 
700UW said:
BS your peeps?

They are not your peeps, you have been removed from office twice now, you have never won an election at the district or international level.

Your a bitter member who ran away from CLT, after all the crap you caused.
Lol. Carry on.
 
If and Only If there a TA that comes our way without enhanced scope protection pay raises up to AA at minimum and Retro Pay then AH and JG can take it to the toilets and wipe their arses with it Enough is enough workin with the crappy contract we currently have
 
robbedagain said:
If and Only If there a TA that comes our way without enhanced scope protection pay raises up to AA at minimum and Retro Pay then AH and JG can take it to the toilets and wipe their arses with it Enough is enough workin with the crappy contract we currently have
totally agree robb a TA  with out is DOA
 
Robbed what if they demand scope comcessions for higher pay rates. Is it worth the trade-off?

Josh
 
700UW said:
BS your peeps?

They are not your peeps, you have been removed from office twice now, you have never won an election at the district or international level.

Your a bitter member who ran away from CLT, after all the crap you caused.
Why do you post lies and misinformation?

Prove your accusations. Tim speaks the truth, you don't, you speak the IAM/company line and what is best for USAIR not the membership.

Josh
 
Josh the answernis Absolutely not worth the crap its written on. We deserve everything we lost in early to mid 2000s yet those jackasses got aa unions 4.3% raises and the us employees got zilch nada nothing. Why should we give up more scope in return for more pay
 
Guys, this thread is about US Fleet, not 700UW, not Tim Nelson...  Could you all just STFU with the irrelevant ancillary BS pissing contests?  I've got limited time and sifting through your three year old chlidlike crap is a serious waste of time!
 
robbedagain said:
Josh the answernis Absolutely not worth the crap its written on. We deserve everything we lost in early to mid 2000s yet those jackasses got aa unions 4.3% raises and the us employees got zilch nada nothing. Why should we give up more scope in return for more pay
Actually, the company isnt asking for less scope. However, this is the time to increase scope. Everyone has personal choices and maybe some would rather load up wage instead of increasing scope, However in the current union proposal, there is no permanent enhancement of scope nor is there amr wages at dos. Not that amr wages are good (they suck) but our nc supports AH that our peeps cant even have the current amr wages. I have a problem with all of this when there cant possibly be any greater position of leverage other than the current one where your wages are the worst in the industry and you are working for the largest airline and second most profitable airline and it needs seamlessness for a merger.
 
Tim is there any proof that our nc team supports AH? I personelly doubt it. I do agree we need enhanced eveything esp now that we are nbr 1 carrier heck if dl can pay their folks higher wages then we should but not at the expense of say scope
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top