What's new

2014 Fleet Service Discussion

Status
Not open for further replies.
ograc said:
Contract negotiations continue to be ongoing. No TA reached in DFW this week. Let's stand our ground.
Lock and Load!
 
roabilly said:
What is being discussed in Negations IS business confidential! Negotiations are completely about a major business expense that is both current, and projected... LABOR COST!
 
Confidentiality Agreements are presented for a reason... to protect the interest of the Company. The NDA’s are not presented to hide information from the Membership. The Membership is allowed to review the full context of any agreement BEFORE voting for it. Only then are the “secrets” of what transpired in Negotiations revealed... LEGALLY under Federal Law!  
That is incorrect sir.  The negotiation team can bring a proposal to the membership.  You are incorrect sir,  please cite the federal law that prohibits a union from bringing back a proposal that doesn't contain financial documents that compromise SEC law, sir?   I'll be waiting for your reference, sir.   Also, I like the 'hard line' Roabilly that has the "Lock and Load".   Don't get soft on us now, sir.  Or did Fairbanks tell you to take it down, sir?
 
Hey Roa, who was blowing smoke up your ass about the release, sir?  Who told you once we approach June that a release will be done with, sir?   Who busted my balls and said, "We prepared to strike and June not have nutt'n to do with it!"     Wake up Roa.  I don't have to remind you that I hate being right in this situation.  The highlight sheet is coming once wikileaks gives me the full review.
 
Tim Nelson said:
 
That is incorrect sir.  The negotiation team can bring a proposal to the membership.  You are incorrect sir,  please cite the federal law that prohibits a union from bringing back a proposal that doesn't contain financial documents that compromise SEC law, sir?   I'll be waiting for your reference, sir.   Also, I like the 'hard line' Roabilly that has the "Lock and Load".   Don't get soft on us now, sir.  Or did Fairbanks tell you to take it down, sir?
 
Hey Roa, who was blowing smoke up your ass about the release, sir?  Who told you once we approach June that a release will be done with, sir?   Who busted my balls and said, "We prepared to strike and June not have nutt'n to do with it!"     Wake up Roa.  I don't have to remind you that I hate being right in this situation.  The highlight sheet is coming once wikileaks gives me the full review.
Cool, we are all waiting for that sheet !....even though it is not final so not official.!!!!
 
 What's with all the sirs'............Geeze louise already !!!!!
 
mike33 said:
Cool, we are all waiting for that sheet !....even though it is not final so not official.!!!!
 
 What's with all the sirs'............Geeze louise already !!!!!
I'm just being polite to Roa.  I miss the old roa that always had "Lock and Load"
 
I'll be bringing out the highlight sheet once I get the full report from WIki.  Everything will be factual up to date.
 
Tim Nelson said:
I'm just being polite to Roa.  I miss the old roa that always had "Lock and Load"
 
I'll be bringing out the highlight sheet once I get the full report from WIki.  Everything will be factual up to date.
can't wait......Doesn't matter what anyone says about anything ... When its on paper then it becomes factual..!! 
 
  Highlight sheet?....how about bringing out language.....A Tim Nelson highlight sheet does nothing !
 
tim,
 
 
Kindly respond to my post 6461 please. All I hear are crickets.
 
For some reason the quote function isn't working
 
mike33 said:
can't wait......Doesn't matter what anyone says about anything ... When its on paper then it becomes factual..!! 
 
  Highlight sheet?....how about bringing out language.....A Tim Nelson highlight sheet does nothing !
Highlight Sheet? I can’t believe this... if Tim's source is credible, we need the whole picture to see if he is are right! A highlight sheet would contain cherry picked, negatively spun fragments of the proposal of advancing his own political aspirations.
 
Not to speak of the fact it would be a highlight sheet from sessions that have never even been agreed to, by either the N/C or the Membership!
 
I’m with you “33” -- Show me ALL of it, or nothing!
 
mike33 said:
can't wait......Doesn't matter what anyone says about anything ... When its on paper then it becomes factual..!! 
 
  Highlight sheet?....how about bringing out language.....A Tim Nelson highlight sheet does nothing !
I'm not sure, I've already contacted key folks in the hubs and they are excited to get the information.  But, it will just be a highlight sheet and wont have the entire contract printed out.  As I said, it appears there are some language issues regarding health care but Delaney says any change to it is cost neutral and not to worry. I'm not so sure, but some issues we will have to leave alone.  The only highlights will be the objective issues that were already signed off.
 
roabilly said:
Highlight Sheet? I can’t believe this... if Tim's source is credible, we need the whole picture to see if he is are right! A highlight sheet would contain cherry picked, negatively spun fragments of the proposal of advancing his own political aspirations.
 
Not to speak of the fact it would be a highlight sheet from sessions that have never even been agreed to, by either the N/C or the Membership!
 
I’m with you “33” -- Show me ALL of it, or nothing!
What are you mad about, Tim has a source and is not afraid of letting the word out. Then again, if you and MF are so tight why isn't he telling you anything? Maybe you could put out a highlight sheet!!!!!! We should know more than just " it's in the hands of LP ". Going on three years and guy's like you that have nothing in this keep badgering away.
 
WeAAsles said:
What do you think the CWA would be able to do for them even if they are voted in as the new bargaining agent?
Your TWU contracts are a hard sell trying to get new union members. Maybe CWA can make you look bad
 
john john said:
Your TWU contracts are a hard sell trying to get new union members. Maybe CWA can make you look bad
 
What about your CWA T/A with a $500 signing bonus and allowed non-covered employees to perform your work?
 
Josh
 
roabilly said:
Highlight Sheet? I can’t believe this... if Tim's source is credible, we need the whole picture to see if he is are right! A highlight sheet would contain cherry picked, negatively spun fragments of the proposal of advancing his own political aspirations.
 
Not to speak of the fact it would be a highlight sheet from sessions that have never even been agreed to, by either the N/C or the Membership!
 
I’m with you “33” -- Show me ALL of it, or nothing!
nothing is against your boy fairbanks allowing you to go ahead and put out a highlight but you already know it would be the same one as mine. Why did fairbanks demand that you remove "lock and load"?. The members want to know.
 
Tim Nelson said:
nothing is against your boy fairbanks allowing you to go ahead and put out a highlight but you already know it would be the same one as mine. Why did fairbanks demand that you remove "lock and load"?. The members want to know.
Sorry, I must not have gotten the memo...
[sharedmedia=core:attachments:10098]
 
737823 said:
What about your CWA T/A with a $500 signing bonus and allowed non-covered employees to perform your work?
 
Josh
Are saying there is an agreement between the CWA membership and management?????????
Please provide details. You know of an agreement is this breaking news form the CWA leadership coming for YOU? You must provide information to this new agreement since you are in the know
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top