What's new

2014 Fleet Service Discussion

Status
Not open for further replies.
700UW said:
Mike when you buy the message board you can make the rules. Dont like what I have to say then use the ignore feature. The truth hurts, too bad.
What hurts so bad is your regime screwed everything up ! End of story!
 
Not my regime, I was 142, you can blame timmy, he pushed for Delaney and the rest.
 
700UW said:
Not my regime, I was 142, you can blame timmy, he pushed for Delaney and the rest.
Hows the scope language for 142 ?.......
 
And i was referring to the previous regime not Delaneys
 
This thread is theater of the absurd.

I can't understand why management has jerked you off for three years at the table...

It's like trying to herd squirrels with ADD.
 
Tim just fyi I filed my grievance in July 2009 had a local hearing jan 2011 then mediation april 2013 if my case is not arbitration hearing by july 2014 itll be 5 yrs but yes I do believe I have a strong case and its my understanding theres about 8 or so other folks in the same or similar boat as me but what kills me is the fact that its taking this long and still no hearing schedule but I thought either cb or prez said theres a few cases sheduled this yr but I dont know beyond that
 
The scope language is decent, but could be better, compared to AA, UA, DL (which has none), and WN the US scope language is better.

50% of all billable hours of HMV must be done in-house, and there are protected line stations and I think 6 or 7 others they have to have, not at home, so I dont have the language in front of me.
 
which backs us back to why you're in a 141 thread and why so much interest?
 
700UW said:
You are deceiving the membership the average arbitration takes two years or more to be heard.

You are lying to the members.
Which is better, jerking the guy off for 6 years or forcing his case to arbitration where we either win it or lose it?
You and the establishment is what i am working to smash down as we build this union up.
you are rotten to the core. According to the contract, waiving off time limits has to have the permission of management so stop telling people that AH would love us to enforce the contract when he is the one that our agcs cut deals with to waive off time limits.
im not going to need AH petmission since i dont plan on cutting deals with him to jerk off the grievances.
if im privileged to represent clt as agc, and cb is still local chair then clt will know that their agc isnt looking for a deal with AH consent. Ill be sticking to the enforcement of time limits.
if clt would rather keep the present course and waive off time limits then they should vote for mf.
 
So why don't you question josh, he doesn't have any connection to US.
 
700UW said:
Not my regime, I was 142, you can blame timmy, he pushed for Delaney and the rest.
i couldnt do everything. Delaney directed the representation arm and i chose to direct the organizing arm. I grew concerned that if i didnt clean up organizing that our pensions would be toast.
Roabily has my team to thank for securing his and our pension.

Yes i felt we should give mf and others a shot, but you know what they say, "if you want something done right.....".
 
Let me express my apologies to the readers on this board for letting Trolls derail my thought process. It got out of hand and thats the truth. Nothing else matters but a Fair and Equitable Contract......Not a TA......A CONTRACT.
 
Now back to the task at hand!
 
JFK Fleet Service said:
This thread is theater of the absurd.

I can't understand why management has jerked you off for three years at the table...

It's like trying to herd squirrels with ADD.
...or cats on kitty crack!
 
Your observation is exactly what's wrong with this group... too many armchair negotiators, and way too much political rhetoric. The Company probably reads this stuff daily and celebrates with a little happy dance! 
 
mike33 said:
Let me express my apologies to the readers on this board for letting Trolls derail my thought process. It got out of hand and thats the truth. Nothing else matters but a Fair and Equitable Contract......Not a TA......A CONTRACT.
 
Now back to the task at hand!
"33"
 
I know you are not too fond of 700 right now, but I will tell you this... he does know his stuff when it comes to negotiations, grievances, and union business. I know him, and he has been an excellent representative in the past, as well as a respected instructor at my local in CLT.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Latest posts

Back
Top